Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT00939003
Other study ID # M10-791
Secondary ID 2009-010643-14
Status Completed
Phase Phase 3
First received July 10, 2009
Last updated September 4, 2014
Start date July 2009
Est. completion date August 2013

Study information

Verified date September 2014
Source AbbVie
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority Australia: Human Research Ethics CommitteeBelgium: Federal Agency for Medicinal Products and Health ProductsCanada: Health CanadaCzech Republic: State Institute for Drug ControlFrance: Afssaps - Agence francaise de securite sanitaire des produits de sante (Saint-Denis)Germany: Paul-Ehrlich-InstitutNetherlands: The Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects (CCMO)Spain: Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos SanitariosUnited Kingdom: Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory AgencyUnited States: Food and Drug Administration
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study will evaluate how well adalimumab works in the short and long term in patients with axial spondyloarthritis who are not diagnosed as having either ankylosing spondylitis or psoriatic arthritis.


Description:

This is a Phase 3, placebo-controlled, double-blind randomized study with an open-label phase designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adalimumab 40 mg administered every other week in adult patients with active axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) who are not diagnosed with ankylosing spondylitis, psoriasis, or psoriatic arthritis and who have had an inadequate response or intolerance to one or more nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or had a contraindication to NSAIDs. Participants receive adalimumab or placebo for 12 weeks during the double-blind phase of the study. Following the double-blind phase, all remaining participants enter the open-label phase of the study in which they receive open-label adalimumab for up to 144 weeks. Efficacy endpoints include the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) response criteria for patients with SpA. These response criteria were used to determine participants who were responders. ASAS response involves evaluations in the following 4 domains: participant's global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, and inflammation. The patient's global assessment of disease activity score is assessed using a 100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS; 0 for no disease activity to 100 for severe disease activity). Pain is represented as a total back pain score and is assessed using a 100 mm VAS (0 for no pain to 100 for most severe pain). Function score is represented as the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Functional Index (BASFI) 100 mm VAS score (average of the ability to perform 10 activities, each scored as 0 for easy to 100 for impossible). Inflammation is determined using the morning stiffness overall level score (0 for none to 10 for very severe) and duration score (0 for 0 hours to 10 for ≥ 2 hours) of the Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) (mean of these items #5 and #6 scores). In addition, the BASDAI is used as an efficacy endpoint. The BASDAI is used by the participant to assess his/her disease activity. Using VAS scales, the participant answers 6 questions pertaining to symptoms experienced over the past week. For 5 questions (levels of: fatigue/tiredness; AS neck, back, or hip pain; pain/swelling; discomfort at areas tender to touch or pressure; and morning stiffness), the response scale is 0 (none) to 10 (very severe). For 1 question (duration of morning stiffness), the response scale is 0 (0 hours) to 10 (≥ 2 or more hours).


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 192
Est. completion date August 2013
Est. primary completion date February 2011
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Adult patients with inadequate response to >/= 1 non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)

- Chronic back pain with onset < 45 years of age

- Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) indicating active sacroiliitis or positive human leukocyte antigen-B27 (HLA-B27) blood test in addition to meeting spondyloarthritis clinical criteria

- Negative purified protein derivative (PPD) test and chest x-ray performed at Baseline visit must be negative

- Ability to administer subcutaneous injections

- General good health otherwise

Exclusion Criteria:

- Prior anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy

- Psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis

- Fulfillment of modified New York criteria for ankylosing spondylitis

- Recent infection requiring treatment

- Significant medical events or conditions that may put patients at risk for participation

- Females who are pregnant or breast-feeding or considering becoming pregnant during the study

- History of cancer, except successfully treated skin cancer

- Recent history of drug or alcohol abuse

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Biological:
Adalimumab
40 mg every other week up to Week 12
Placebo
Placebo every other week up to Week 12
Open-label Adalimumab
40 mg every other week, Week 12 through Week 156

Locations

Country Name City State
Australia Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22342 Brisbane
Australia Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21223 Kogarah
Australia Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21222 Maroochydore
Belgium Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21225 Genk
Belgium Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21224 Ghent
Belgium Site Reference ID/Investigator# 26544 Gilly
Belgium Site Reference ID/Investigator# 27382 Merksem
Canada Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21229 Edmonton
Canada Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21226 Sainte-Foy, Quebec
Canada Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21227 St. John's
Canada Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21228 Toronto
Czech Republic Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21231 Brno
Czech Republic Site Reference ID/Investigator# 26882 Pardubice
Czech Republic Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21230 Prague 2
Czech Republic Site Reference ID/Investigator# 26883 Uherske Hradiste
France Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21263 Boulogne Billancourt
France Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21262 Chambray-les-Tour
France Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21261 Orleans
France Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22343 Paris Cedex 14
Germany Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21266 Berlin
Germany Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21267 Erlangen
Germany Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21264 Herne
Germany Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21265 Munich
Netherlands Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21285 Amsterdam
Netherlands Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21284 Leiden
Spain Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21282 A Coruna
Spain Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21283 Barcelona
Spain Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21281 Cordoba
United Kingdom Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21289 Newcastle upon Tyne
United States Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21250 Birmingham Alabama
United States Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21249 Colorado Springs Colorado
United States Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21243 Dallas Texas
United States Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21245 Denver Colorado
United States Site Reference ID/Investigator# 26582 Duncansville Pennsylvania
United States Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21248 Houston Texas
United States Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21247 Seattle Washington
United States Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21246 Wheaton Maryland
United States Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21241 Wyomissing Pennsylvania

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  Australia,  Belgium,  Canada,  Czech Republic,  France,  Germany,  Netherlands,  Spain,  United Kingdom, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Other Number of Participants Reporting Adverse Events Adverse events were collected at designated study visits for all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. The number of participants experiencing any adverse event (serious and non-serious) is summarized. Through Week 12 Yes
Other Number of Participants With Blood Hematology or Chemistry Values Common Toxicity Criteria Grade = 3 Blood was collected for analysis at designated study visits; hematology and chemistry results were provided by a central laboratory. The number of participants with an abnormal laboratory result (higher then upper normal limit or lower than lower normal limit) meeting Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) of Grade 3 or higher is summarized. Through Week 12 Yes
Other Number of Participants Achieving an ASAS20 Response During the Open-label Period ASAS20 response was defined as improvement of = 20% relative to Baseline and absolute improvement of = 10 units (on a scale from 0 to 100) in = 3 of the following 4 domains with no deterioration (defined as a change for the worse of = 20% and net worsening of = 10 units) in the potential remaining domain:
Patient's Global Assessment of disease activity, measured on a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 (none) to 100 (severe);
Pain, measured by the total back pain VAS from 0 (no pain) to 100 (most severe);
Function, measured by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) which consists of 10 items assessing participants' ability to perform activities on a VAS ranging from 0 (easy) to 100 (impossible);
Inflammation, measured by the mean of the 2 morning stiffness-related Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) VAS scores (items 5 [level of stiffness] and 6 [duration of stiffness]) each on a scale from 0 (none/0 hours) to 10 (very severe/2 hours or more duration).
Baseline and Weeks 52, 104, and 156 No
Other Number of Participants Achieving an ASAS40 Response During the Open-label Period ASAS40 response was defined as improvement of = 40% relative to Baseline and absolute improvement of = 20 units (on a scale from 0 to 100) in = 3 of the following 4 domains with no deterioration (defined as a net worsening of > 0 units on a scale of 0 to 100) in the potential remaining domain:
Patient's Global Assessment of disease activity, measured on a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 (none) to 100 (severe);
Pain, measured by the total back pain VAS from 0 (no pain) to 100 (most severe);
Function, measured by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) which consists of 10 items assessing participants' ability to perform activities on a VAS ranging from 0 (easy) to 100 (impossible);
Inflammation, measured by the mean of the 2 morning stiffness-related Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) VAS scores (items 5 [level of stiffness] and 6 [duration of stiffness]) each on a scale from 0 (none/0 hours) to 10 (very severe/2 hours or more duration).
Baseline and Weeks 52, 104, and 156 No
Other Number of Participants Achieving a BASDAI50 Response During the Open-label Period The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index assesses disease activity by asking the participant to answer 6 questions (each on a 10 cm VAS) pertaining to symptoms experienced for the past week. For 5 questions (level of fatigue/tiredness, level of AS neck, back or hip pain, level of pain/swelling in joints, other than neck, back or hips, level of discomfort from any areas tender to touch or pressure, and level of morning stiffness), the response is from 0 (none) to 10 (very severe); for Question 6 (duration of morning stiffness), the response is from 0 (0 hours) to 10 (= 2 hours). The overall BASDAI score ranges from 0 to 10 cm. Lower scores indicate less disease activity. BASDAI50 is a 50% improvement from Baseline in BASDAI score. Baseline and Weeks 52, 104, and 156 No
Primary Number of Participants Achieving an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) 40 Response ASAS40 response was defined as improvement of = 40% relative to Baseline and absolute improvement of = 20 units (on a scale from 0 to 100) in = 3 of the following 4 domains with no deterioration (defined as a net worsening of > 0 units on a scale from 0 to 100) in the potential remaining domain:
Patient's Global Assessment of disease activity, measured on a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 (none) to 100 (severe);
Pain, measured by the total back pain VAS from 0 (no pain) to 100 (most severe);
Function, measured by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) which consists of 10 items assessing participants' ability to perform activities on a VAS ranging from 0 (easy) to 100 (impossible);
Inflammation, measured by the mean of the 2 morning stiffness-related Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) VAS scores (items 5 [level of stiffness] and 6 [duration of stiffness]) each on a scale from 0 (none/0 hours) to 10 (very severe/2 hours or more duration).
Baseline and Week 12 No
Secondary Number of Participants Achieving an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) 20 Response ASAS20 response was defined as improvement of = 20% relative to Baseline and absolute improvement of = 10 units (on a scale from 0 to 100) in = 3 of the following 4 domains with no deterioration (defined as a change for the worse of = 20% and net worsening of = 10 units) in the potential remaining domain:
Patient's Global Assessment of disease activity, measured on a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 (none) to 100 (severe);
Pain, measured by the total back pain VAS from 0 (no pain) to 100 (most severe);
Function, measured by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) which consists of 10 items assessing participants' ability to perform activities on a VAS ranging from 0 (easy) to 100 (impossible);
Inflammation, measured by the mean of the 2 morning stiffness-related Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) VAS scores (items 5 [level of stiffness] and 6 [duration of stiffness]) each on a scale from 0 (none/0 hours) to 10 (very severe/2 hours or more duration).
Baseline and Week 12 No
Secondary Number of Participants Achieving a Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) 50 Response The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index assesses disease activity by asking the participant to answer 6 questions (each on a 10 cm VAS) pertaining to symptoms experienced for the past week. For 5 questions (level of fatigue/tiredness, level of AS neck, back or hip pain, level of pain/swelling in joints, other than neck, back or hips, level of discomfort from any areas tender to touch or pressure, and level of morning stiffness), the response is from 0 (none) to 10 (very severe); for Question 6 (duration of morning stiffness), the response is from 0 (0 hours) to 10 (= 2 hours). The overall BASDAI score ranges from 0 to 10 cm. Lower scores indicate less disease activity. BASDAI50 is a 50% improvement from Baseline in BASDAI score. Baseline and Week 12 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary Score The Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36) is a self-administered instrument that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life. The SF-36 consists of 36 questions in 8 domains (limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; bodily pain; general health perceptions; vitality; limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and general mental health). Two component scores can be summarized: physical and mental; domains 1-4 comprise the physical component summary of the SF-36. A transformed summary score is calculated ranging from 0 to 100 where higher scores indicate a higher level of functioning. A positive change from Baseline score indicates an improvement. Baseline and Week 12 No
Secondary Number of Participants Achieving ASAS Partial Remission ASAS partial remission is an absolute score of < 20 units on a 0 to 100 scale for each of the four following domains:
Patient's Global Assessment of disease activity, measured on a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 (none) to 100 (severe);
Pain, measured by the total back pain VAS from 0 (no pain) to 100 (most severe);
Function, measured by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) which consists of 10 items assessing participants' ability to perform activities on a VAS ranging from 0 (easy) to 100 (impossible);
Inflammation, measured by the mean of the 2 morning stiffness-related Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) VAS scores (items 5 [level of stiffness] and 6 [duration of stiffness]) each on a scale from 0 (none/0 hours) to 10 (very severe/2 hours or more duration).
Week 12 No
Secondary Number of Participants Achieving an ASAS5/6 Response ASAS5/6 response is a 20% improvement in five out of the following six domains:
Patient's Global Assessment of disease activity, measured on a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 (none) to 100 (severe);
Pain, measured by the total back pain VAS from 0 (no pain) to 100 (most severe);
Function, measured by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) which consists of 10 items assessing participants' ability to perform activities on a VAS ranging from 0 (easy) to 100 (impossible);
Inflammation, measured by the mean of the 2 morning stiffness-related Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) VAS scores (items 5 [level of stiffness] and 6 [duration of stiffness]) each on a scale from 0 (none) to 10 (very severe/2 hours or more duration).
Spinal mobility, measured from the lateral lumbar flexion score of the Bath AS Metrology Index (BASMI) on a scale from 0 (best mobility) to 10 (worst mobility);
C-reactive protein level (lower levels indicate less inflammation).
Baseline and Week 12 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Disability Index of Health Assessment Questionnaire Modified for the Spondyloarthropathies (HAQ-S) Health Assessment Questionnaire modified for spondyloarthropathies (HAQ-S) is a self-reported measure to assess the physical function and health-related quality of life. The Disability Index (DI) of HAQ-S is calculated as the mean of the following 8 category scores (range: 0 [without any difficulty] to 3 [unable to do]): Dressing and Grooming, Rising, Eating, Walking, Hygiene, Reach, Grip, and Activities. Five additional items in the functional status measure were included in the HAQ-S, including carrying heavy packages, sitting for long periods, able to work at a flat topped table, and (if the participant had a driver's license or a car) able to look in the rear view mirror and able to turn head to drive in reverse. The overall score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 3 (three very severe, high-dependency disability). Negative mean changes from Baseline in the overall score indicate improvement. Baseline and Week 12 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) C-reactive protein (CRP) is considered an efficacy variable for the axial spondyloarthritis indication. It is a general marker of inflammation that is sensitive to acute changes in inflammatory response. Higher levels indicate more inflammation. Baseline and Week 12 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Score for Sacroiliac Joints Six consecutive sacroiliac (SI) joint image coronal slices representing the largest proportion of the synovial compartment of the SI joints were assessed for edema, intensity and depth of edema using SPARCC scoring.
Each SI joint (left and right) was divided into quadrants for a total of 8 SI scoring locations. Each quadrant was scored for the presence (1) or absence (0) of edema; the maximum score is 8 per slice and maximum score for 6 SI joint slices is 48.
Intensity of edema: A score of 1 was assigned for each SI joint (left and right) if an intense signal was seen in any quadrant of that joint for each slice. The maximum score is 2 per slice and 12 for 6 slices.
A lesion was graded as deep (score of 1) if there was homogeneous and unequivocal increase in signal extending over a depth of at least 1 cm from the articular surface of the SI joint in any quadrant. The maximum score per slice is 2 and for 6 slices 12.
The total maximum score for all SI joints across 6 slices is 72.
Baseline and Week 12 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in SPARCC MRI Score for the Spine Six discovertebral units (DVU) representing the 6 most abnormal DVUs, and 3 consecutive sagittal slices at each DVU representing the most abnormal slices for that DVU were selected for scoring. Each DVU was divided into 4 quadrants and scored for the presence (1) or absence (0) of edema. The maximum score is 12 per DVU. The maximum score is 72 for 6 DVUs.
If edema was present in at least 1 quadrant of a DVU slice, it was scored for intensity and depth of the edema representing that slice:
A score of 1 was assigned if an intense signal was seen in any quadrant on a DVU slice. The maximum score for intensity per slice is 1, per DVU is 3 and for 6 DVUs is 18.
A lesion was graded as deep (score of 1) if there was homogeneous and unequivocal increase in signal extending over a depth of at least 1 cm from the surface of the endplate in any quadrant. The maximum score per slice is 1, for a DVU is 3 and for 6 DVUs is 18.
The total maximum SPARCC score for all 6 DVUs is 108.
Baseline and Week 12 No
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05031767 - Remote Monitoring of Axial Spondyloarthritis N/A
Completed NCT05162937 - to Evaluate the Preliminary Efficacy and Safety of GR1501 Injection in Patients With Active Axial Spondyloarthritis Phase 2
Completed NCT03622658 - Efficacy and Safety of Namilumab for Moderate-to-severe Axial Spondyloarthritis Phase 2
Completed NCT03248518 - Lessening the Impact of Fatigue in Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases N/A
Terminated NCT02437162 - A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ustekinumab in the Treatment of Anti-TNFα Naive Participants With Active Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis Phase 3
Enrolling by invitation NCT06072859 - The Impact of Simulated Forest Immersion Therapy on Pain and Anxiety in Patients Axial Spondyloarthritis (axSpA) N/A
Completed NCT02552212 - Multicenter Study Evaluating Certolizumab Pegol Compared to Placebo in Subjects With axSpA Without X-ray Evidence of AS Phase 3
Active, not recruiting NCT02687620 - Does Immunogenicity Have an Influence on the Efficacy of Anti-TNF Therapy in Patients With AS: An Inception Cohort Study
Active, not recruiting NCT01944163 - The IMPACT of a Referral Model for Axial Spondyloarthritis in Young Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain N/A
Completed NCT00844805 - Infliximab for Treatment of Axial Spondyloarthritis (P05336 AM1) Phase 3
Terminated NCT02897115 - A Study Treating Participants With Early Axial Spondyloarthritis (axSpA) Taking an Intense Treatment Approach Versus Routine Treatment Phase 4
Completed NCT05019547 - The Turkish Version of the Inflammatory Arthritis Facilitators and Barriers to Physical Activity
Recruiting NCT03738956 - Safety and Efficacy of Tofacitinib in the Treatment of NSAID Refractory Axial Spondyloarthritis:A Clinical Trial Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT04679649 - Physiotherapy of Axial Spondyloarthritis N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT02962479 - Is the Human Microbiome Altered in Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis? N/A
Completed NCT04485078 - Investigation of Central Sensitization Frequency and Related Factors in Axial Spondyloarthritis Patients
Recruiting NCT05812157 - Optimizing Anti-IL17 Antibody Therapy by Associating Fiber Supplementation to Correct Treatment-aggravated Gut Dysbiosis in Axial Spondyloarthritis - RESPOND-IL17 N/A
Completed NCT03039088 - PREDICT-SpA - French Epidemiological Study of the Evaluation of the Impact of Fibromyalgia in the TNF Alpha Treatment Effect in Axial Spondyloarthritis in Both Anti-TNF naïve and - Experienced Patients
Completed NCT04368494 - Exercise Therapy in Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis N/A
Completed NCT03270501 - Efficacy of Golimumab in Early Axial Spondyloarthritis in Relation to Gut Inflammation Phase 3

External Links