View clinical trials related to Axial Spondyloarthritis.
Filter by:The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the efficacy of tofacitinib in refractory axial spodyloarthritis (ax-SpA) with dose escalation from 10mg to 15mg. Patients will start on 10mg and then divided into 2 groups (10 and 15) at 3rd month according to major improvement criteria. The main question[s] it aims to answer are: - Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in different doses - If escalation of tofacitinib is justified if clinical criteria is not fulfilled at 10mg
The goal of this observational study is to investigate the reliability of BASDAI and BASFI questionnaires applied via tele-assessment in axial spondyloarthritis patients.
The aim of this study is to investigate the sonographic differences in entheses in patients with Rheumatoid arthritis and Axial Spondyloarthropathy.
investigators aimed to evaluate the relationship between Systemic Immune Inflammation Index (SII) and Systemic Inflammation Response Index (SIRI) and disease activity in patients with axial spondyloarthropathy (SpA).
Unlike other rheumatic diseases, acute phase reactants such as C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate are not diagnostic for patients with Spondyloarthropathies (SpA). Also, it is not possible to monitor disease activity with these tests. On the other hand, HLA-B27 positivity varies between races, and 8% of the normal population is HLA-B27 positive. In this manner, new biomarkers for endorsing the diagnosis and monitoring the disease activity are necessary. Acute phase reactants are not sensitive for diagnosing and assessing disease activity. This may lead to a diagnostic delay of up to 9 years. The investigators hypothesize that Raftlin-1, thought to have a regulatory role in TH17 function and IL-17-mediated immunity, may be a novel biomarker for showing inflammation-related clinical features.
This was a multicenter, retrospective, and non-interventional study using secondary data captured in the Electronic Health Records (EHRs). The extraction of the data captured in the EHRs was performed with EHRead® by SAVANA, an innovating data-driven system based on Natural Language Processing (NLP) and big data analytics. Data was extracted and analyzed at Index Date, Follow Up, or as specified for each variable.
The current ASAS classification of AxSpA relies either on sacroiliitis on imaging plus one SpA feature (imaging arm) or HLA-B27 antigen plus two SpA features (clinical arm), in a patient with chronic back pain and age at onset of less than 45 years. IBP which is a major symptom of SpA depends more on patient's perception which is not usually accurate. As well, disease activity is measured by ASDAS, BASDAI, and BASFAI which depend more on subjective measures. Assessment of reliability of IBP criteria, ASDAS, BASDAI, and BASFAI in diagnosis and evaluation of activity of AxSpA is essential for better health care.
Dosage: 100mg or 200mg or 300mg Administration frequency: Q2W administration in the first 4 weeks (W0, W2, W4), and subsequent Q4W administration (W8, W12) Administration: subcutaneous injection Specifications: 100mg/ 1mL/bottle or placebo 0mg/1ml/ bottle
The ReMonit study is a 18-months, non-inferiority randomized, controlled trial with three parallel arms to determine if two, new follow-up strategies for patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) are non-inferior in maintaining stable, low disease activity over time compared to the conventional follow-up regimen with regular hospital visits.
Axial spondyloarthritis is one of the most common rheumatic diseases and chronic pain and morning stiffness are the main complaints of these patients. Central sensitization is defined as increased response to normal or sub-threshold stimuli of central nervous system and its close relationship with many rheumatological diseases has been demonstrated in several studies. There is no method for the diagnosis of central sensitization is accepted as a gold standard. The clinical scales and quantitative sensory testing (QST) widely is used for this purpose widely. The most commonly used QST types include pressure pain threshold (PPT), temporal summation (TS) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM). The well-known scale used for the evaluation of central sensitization is the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) , developed in 2011 for detect central sensitization in chronic pain patients. In this study, it was aimed to investigate the relationship between QST and CSI and sacroiliac MRI changes.