View clinical trials related to Atrioventricular Block.
Filter by:This study is intended to compare the feasibility, safety and efficacy of Ensite-NavX zero-fluoroscopic navigation system to conventional fluoroscopic X-ray approach as to performing single-chamber pacemaker implantation.
This study is intended to compare the feasibility, safety and efficacy of Ensite-NavX zero-fluoroscopic navigation system to conventional fluoroscopic X-ray approach as to performing double-chamber pacemaker implantation.
The purpose of this study is to determine the incidence and predictors of high degree or complete atrioventricular block (AVB) (paroxysmal or persistent) in patients with new-onset persistent left bundle branch block (NOP-LBBB) following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and to evaluate the usefulness of the Reveal LINQ® insertable Cardiac Monitor (ICM) (Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, USA) for the detection of significant arrhythmias in patients with NOP-LBBB following TAVI.
This study was designed to evaluate the potential benefits of treatment with biventricular device in patients with normal systolic function , indication for pacing and impaired atrio-ventricular conduction , by comparing the treatment with dual-chamber device . The REAL -CRT study is designed to test the hypothesis that, in patients with atrioventricular block of I degree and standard pacing indications , biventricular pacing is superior to single stimulation of the right ventricle (RV) with optimized algorithms for minimization of pacing , as assessed by echocardiography an endpoint defined in terms of maintenance over time of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ) and left ventricular end-systolic volume ( LVESV ) .
Previous experimental and clinical studies have consistently suggested that right ventricular (RV) apical pacing has important adverse effects. Ventricular pacing, however, is required, and cannot be reduced in many patients with atrioventricular block. The SAFE-LVPACE study is a randomized controlled trial that compare the effects of conventional right ventricular (RV) pacing vs. left ventricular (LV) in patients with AV block.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of minimizing right ventricular pacing in dual-chamber pacemaker patients with sinus node disease (SND) and first degree atrioventricular block (AVIB)on exercise capacity, quality of life and other heart failure measures.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is a relationship between ventricular lead position and the incidence of heart failure and atrial fibrillation in patients with indication for permanent pacemaker stimulation.