Atrial Fibrillation, Persistent Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Randomized Controlled Study on the Waveform Periodicity Analysis of Complex Fractionated Electrograms in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Atrial fibrillation (AF) has been the most frequently occurring, sustained arrhythmia, which causes significant morbidity and mortality. AF may not always be a totally random process. It can be maintained by stable and rapid reentrant circuits resulting in fibrillary conduction throughout the atria. During mapping of AF, difficulty is frequently encountered during the identification of culprit sites and an analysis of the wave propagation particularly when the electrogram signals demonstrate wide temporal and spatial disparities. Catheter ablation targeting regions with fractionated potentials or high frequencies during AF, has been previously proposed as a treatment strategy. However, the benefit of adjunctive CFAE (complex fractionated atrial electrogram) ablation or linear ablation after successful PVI (pulmonary vein isolation) was controversial based on the recent data from the Substrate and Trigger Ablation for Reduction of Atrial Fibrillation Trial Part II (STAR AF II) trial. Therefore, the optimal ablation strategy for persistent AF remains undetermined and an alternative approach has to be explored.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 80 |
Est. completion date | December 31, 2025 |
Est. primary completion date | December 31, 2022 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 20 Years to 90 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patents who sign the informed consent forms, and allow to be followed. 2. Symptomatic AF refractory or intolerant to at least one Class 1 or 3 antiarrhythmic medication. 3. Patients with persistent/permanent AF (sustained beyond seven days, or lasting less than seven days but necessitating pharmacologic or electrical cardioversion). 4. Patients with age equal or greater than 20 years old regardless of gender. Exclusion Criteria: 1. The presence of a atrial or ventricular thrombus. 2. Patients who are allergic to or unsuitable for use with the contrast media. 3. Pregnant patients or patients who are unavailable to receive X-ray. 4. Patients with renal insufficiency. 5. Patients had autonomic nervous system disorder (e.g. respiratory apnea) or previous catheter ablation in the LA or MAZE procedure. 6. Patients who do not need atrial substrate modification (patients with non-paroxysmal AF respond to PVI in terms of procedural termination of AF). 7. Patients with age less than 20 years old or greater than 90 years old regardless of gender. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Taiwan | Taipei General Veterans Hospital | Taipei |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan |
Taiwan,
Hsieh YC, Lin YJ, Lo MT, Chen YY, Lin CY, Lin C, Chung FP, Lo LW, Chang SL, Chao TF, Hu YF, Tuan TC, Liao JN, Wu CI, Liu CM, Vicera JB, Chen CC, Chin CG, Lugtu IC, Chen SA. Optimal substrate modification strategies using catheter ablation in patients with — View Citation
Lin CY, Lin YJ, Lo MT, Chiang CH, Chen YY, Kuo L, Chang SL, Lo LW, Hu YF, Chao TF, Chung FP, Liao JN, Chang TY, Lin C, Tuan TC, Wu CI, Liu CM, Liu SH, Cheng WH, Lugtu IC, Jain A, Ton AN, Hermanto DY, Chen SA. Efficacy of Patient-Specific Strategy: Cathete — View Citation
Lin CY, Lin YJ, Narayan SM, Baykaner T, Lo MT, Chung FP, Chen YY, Chang SL, Lo LW, Hu YF, Liao JN, Tuan TC, Chao TF, Te ALD, Kuo L, Vicera JJB, Chang TY, Salim S, Chien KL, Chen SA. Comparison of phase mapping and electrogram-based driver mapping for cath — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | changes in retention rate of normal sinus rhythm after catheter-based ablation of atrial fibrillation | A 24-hour Holter monitoring and/or ECG (7 days recordings) will be performed at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post ablation and/or when the patients experience symptoms suggestive of a tachycardia after the ablation.
Measurements: documentation of AF signal duration more than 30 seconds. |
Baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after catheter-based ablation of atrial fibrillation | |
Secondary | LAD | Echocardiography will be performed at 3, 6, and 12 month post-ablation for cardiac chamber dimension and atrial systolic function to assess the reverse remodeling of atrial substrate after catheter ablation of AF.
LAD [left atrial diameter] |
after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation 3, 6, 12 month | |
Secondary | LVEF | Echocardiography will be performed at 3, 6, and 12 month post-ablation for cardiac chamber dimension and ventricular systolic function to assess the reverse remodeling of atrial substrate after catheter ablation of AF.
LVEF [left ventricular ejection fraction] |
after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation 3, 6, 12 month | |
Secondary | e/e' | Echocardiography will be performed at 3, 6, and 12 month post-ablation for cardiac chamber dimension and ventricular systolic function to assess the reverse remodeling of atrial substrate after catheter ablation of AF.
e/e'[the ratio of early diastolic mitral inflow velocity to early diastolic mitral annulus velocity] |
after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation 3, 6, 12 month |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04544397 -
Outcomes of Second Generation Laser Balloon Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
|
||
Completed |
NCT04473963 -
FLOW-AF: A Study to Evaluate the Ablacon Electrographic FLOW EGF Technology
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04715425 -
Thoracoscopic Surgical Versus Catheter Ablation Approaches for Primary Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04045067 -
Low-voltage Areas Defragmentation in Sinus Rhythm for Radiofrequency Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
|
||
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT04148625 -
Subxyphoid Hybrid MAZE Registry for Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05481359 -
AF-FLOW Registry: This Study is to Evaluate Ablamap Software in Patients Undergoing Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation.
|
||
Completed |
NCT06260670 -
FLOW EVAL-AF: FLOW Mapping Electrogram VALidation in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05883631 -
RESOLVE-AF: Clinical Evaluation of the Ablacathâ„¢ Mapping Catheter and Ablamap® System Utilizing Electrographic Flow (EGF) Mapping to Resolve Extra-PV Sources of Atrial Fibrillation and Guide Ablation Therapy.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04942834 -
Using Cryoballoon Ablation as Initial Treatment for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04606693 -
Value of Screening and Treatment of SAHS in the Management of AF Ablation Candidates
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT04508491 -
Cognitive Function in Patients With Persisted Atrial Fibrillation
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05507749 -
Cyroablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation Alone in Patients With Early Persistent AF Assessed by Continuous Monitoring
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06098989 -
A Prospective Study of REPeat Ablation In Patients With Recurrent PERSistent Atrial Fibrillation: Pulmonary Vein Isolation vs. Adjunct Posterior Wall Isolation (REPAIR PERS-AF Study)
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05575557 -
Pulmonary Artery Pressure and Right Heart Evaluation for Patients Requiring Physiological Pacing Treatment
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05411614 -
Hybrid AbLaTion of Atrial Fibrillation
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04342312 -
Intensive Molecular and Electropathological Characterization of Patients Undergoing Atrial Fibrillation Ablation
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04542785 -
Lenient Rate Control Versus Strict Rate Control for Atrial Fibrillation. The Danish Atrial Fibrillation Randomised Clinical Trial
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04237389 -
Thoracoscopic Ablation Versus Catheter Ablation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT04206917 -
MultiPulse Therapy (MPT) for AF
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04229160 -
Noninvasive 3D Mapping in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation, to Describe Modifications of the Arrhythmogenic Substrate After Pulmonary Vein Isolation and Identify Potential Predicting Factors of Ablation Success
|
N/A |