View clinical trials related to Atrial Fibrillation, Persistent.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to retrospectively analyze electroanatomical data collected during persistent atrial fibrillation ablation procedures, combined with pre-ablation cardiac CT data, in order to: - define a new method for quantifying left atrial voltage in atrial fibrillation via a total energy map instead of a peak-to-peak amplitude map - confirm the association between epicardial fat localization and atrial conduction slowing
Rationale: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a highly prevalent cardiac arrhythmia. AF is classified as paroxysmal or persistent AF, based on the duration and persistency of the arrhythmia. Despite state-of-the-art pharmacological therapies targeting the ventricular rate or aiming to restore sinus rhythm, many patients with persistent AF stay symptomatic. Catheter ablation, endocardial pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in particular, is the most commonly applied approach to treat drug refractory persistent AF, but particularly in this patient group results are modest. Alternatively, the PVs can be approached epicardially by thoracoscopic surgery to isolate the PVs. This approach is more efficacious, at the cost of a more invasive procedure and longer hospital stay. However, no studies have been conducted comparing catheter with thoracoscopic ablation in patients with persistent AF as a primary invasive procedure after failing treatment with anti-arrhythmic medication. Objective: This current study aims to assess a patient specific therapy plan for patients with persistent AF by randomizing thoracoscopic versus catheter ablation for PVI without adjuvant substrate ablation in those patients. Study design: This is a prospective, non-blinded randomized multicenter study. Subjects will be randomized (1:1) to one of the two study-arms (thoracoscopic surgical or catheter PVI). The follow-up will last 5 years, with heart rhythm monitoring at three and six months, one year and yearly in the following years. In case AF recurs during the first year, the subject will receive the treatment of the otherother arm, or according to patient choice or clinical routine. Study population: Patients with an indication for invasive treatment of persistent AF. Intervention: Thoracoscopic surgical or catheter PVI without additional lesions.
The present prospective cohort study (not randomized) analyses the value of screening and treatment of SAHS in the management of patients with AF refractory to antiarrhythmics drugs, potentially candidates for ablation. Patients at low risk of suffering from SAHS will follow conventional management of their AF, according to the usual criteria of the Arrhythmia Unit. Patients with high or intermediate risk of SAHS, will undergo respiratory polygraphy. If the result is positive, they will be treated as standard for this syndrome and their heart rate will be monitored for 3 months. After this, the patient's arrhythmic load will be reevaluated differentiating patients into two groups, those that must be ablated from those that have improved their condition and the clinical criteria is no longer ablation but follow-up.
Atrial fibrillation is the most common heart arrhythmia with a prevalence of approximately 2% in the western world. Atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk of death and morbidity. The comparable effects of a lenient rate control strategy and a strict rate control strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation are uncertain and only one trial has assessed this previously in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation. The investigators will therefore undertake a randomised, superiority trial at four hospitals in Denmark.
Rationale: Although there are several individual factors which are known to influence the chances of successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, it remains a challenge to identify patients at risk for ablation failure with satisfactory certainty. Objectives: To identify predictors of success of AF ablation including clinical factors, AF recurrence patterns, anatomical and electrophysiological characteristics, circulating biomarkers and individual genetic background. Study design: Prospective registry of patients undergoing AF ablation. Clinical characteristics and results of routine tests are collected. In addition, the following (non-standard) tests are performed: extended surface electrocardiogram (extECG), extended rhythm monitoring, biomarker testing, genetic analysis, questionnaires. In subgroups of patients transesophageal electrocardiogram (TE-ECG), epicardial electroanatomical mapping and/or left atrial appendage (LAA) biopsy is performed. Study population: Patients aged 18 years and older with documented AF, scheduled for AF ablation. Main study endpoints: Ablation success after 12 and 24 months, defined as freedom from any episode of documented atrial arrhythmia after the blanking period.
Despite good progress in the management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), this arrhythmia remains one of the major causes of stroke, heart failure, sudden death, and cardiovascular morbidity in the world. Furthermore, the number of patients with AF is predicted to rise steply in the coming years. Even if the amount of antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) is constantly increasing, there is a group of patients who has AF, resistant to AAD therapy. In such cases they are being offered alternative minimally invasive procedures, such as catheter or thoracoscopic ablation. With the discovery that AF often is initiated and maintained by electrical instability inside and around the pulmonary veins (PV) catheter and thoracoscopic ablation are now widely accepted invasive strategies to cure AF. Even though the results of both of the procedures are very promising in treating patients with paroxysmal AF, the decision making process, which approach should be used in patients with persistant or LSPAF, is still very controversial. According to 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS, catheter or surgical ablation should be considered in patients with symptomatic persistent or long-standing persistent (LSP) AF refractory to AAD therapy to improve symptoms, considering patient choice, benefit and risk, supported by an AF Heart Team (IIaC). Since, there is no actual evidence base, which approach is more effective and save in patients with persistant and LSP AF, the aim of the investigator's study is to evaluate the results of both of the approaches in such group of patients.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia in adults. It is a major cause of ischemic stroke and heart failure. Intravascular cardiac ablation of the left atrium by catheter delivery is an efficient treatment to restore sinus rhythm. AF ablation is a class IIa treatment for patients with symptomatic persistent AF refractory or intolerant to antiarrhythmic medication. There are still many debates considering the ablation strategy. The pulmonary veins remain the cornerstone of AF ablation therapy, even in persistent AF. There is a large electrical remodeling occurring in the left atrium between paroxysmal AF, early persistent AF and long-standing persistent AF. However, no multicentric and randomized study has demonstrated so far the interest of targeting other left atrial substrate, such as rotors or focal sources. Our study aims to describe with a noninvasive mapping system the arrhythmogenic substrate of persistent AF > 6 months pre- and post-cardioversion, and after pulmonary vein isolation.