View clinical trials related to Atelectasis.
Filter by:BACKGROUND. Postoperative pulmonary complications are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality after cardiac surgery. To this date, there are no recommendations regarding mechanical ventilation associated with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) during the surgery and anesthesiologists perform either no ventilation (noV) at all during CPB or maintain a low-tidal volume ventilation (LTV). Indirect evidence points towards better pulmonary outcomes when LTV is performed but no proper prospective trial with large inclusion of all types of cardiac surgery has been published. DESIGN. The MECANO trial is a single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial comparing two mechanical ventilation strategies, noV and LTV, during cardiac surgery with CPB. 1500 patients will be included for whom planned cardiac surgery with CPB is performed. They will be randomized between noV and LTV, on a 1:1 ratio. The noV group will receive no ventilation during CPB. The LTV group will receive 5 acts/minute with a tidal volume of 3 mL/kg and positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 cmH2O. Primary endpoint will be composite of overall death, early respiratory failure defined as PaO2/FiO2 ratio <200 mmHg at one-hour after arrival in the ICU, heavy oxygenation support (defined as a patient requiring either non-invasive ventilation, mechanical ventilation or high flow oxygen) at 2 days after arrival in the ICU or ventilator acquired pneumoniae defined by Center of Disease Control. Lung recruitment manoeuvers will be performed for noV and LTV groups, at the end of surgery and at the arrival in ICU with an insufflation at +30 cmH20 during 5 seconds. Secondary endpoints are those composing the primary endpoint with the addition of pneumothorax, CPB duration, quantity of postoperative bleeding, red blood cells transfusions, revision surgery requirements, length of stay in the ICU and in the hospital and total hospitalization costs. Patients will be followed until hospital discharge. SUMMARY. The MECANO trial compares a no-ventilation to a low-tidal volume strategy for mechanical ventilation during cardiac surgery with CPB, regarding a primary composite outcome including death, respiratory failure and pneumoniae.
The primary purpose of this study is to determine if there is a significant difference in regional distribution of ventilation when comparing eupneic tidal ventilation with Incentive Spirometry (I.S.) and EzPAP® lung expansion therapy in healthy adult human subjects. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) will be used to measure regional distribution of ventilation during resting tidal ventilation and during lung expansion therapy.
During general anesthesia, functional residual capacity (FRC) is reduced. If the FRC is lower than the minimum volume required to maintain the opening of the airways, there is a derecruitment of the lung parenchyma, leading to the phenomenon of expiratory flow limitation (EFL). The Driving Pressure (DP) is the difference between the plateau pressure (Pplateau) and the Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP), and estimates the lung strain. The incidence of EFL and the importance of DP are not known in adult cardiac surgery, so it's necessary a study to assess both. The primary end-point of the study is to evaluate the correlation of DP and EFL with PPCs in adult cardiac surgery. The secondary end-point of the study is to evaluate: the mechanical ventilation time, the length of ICU and hospital stay, the rehospitalization and mortality. It will be a prospective, observational, non-pharmacological study. It will enroll 200 patients undergoing elective adult cardiac surgery.
Post-operative pulmonary complications (PPCs) have a major impact on patients and healthcare expenses. The goal of perioperative respiratory therapy is to improve airway clearance, increase lung volume, and mitigate atelectasis. Incentive spirometers (IS) are ubiquitously used to prevent atelectasis and PPCs—implementation of which requires substantial provider time and healthcare expenses. However, meta-analyses have demonstrated that the effectiveness of ISs is unclear due to poor patient compliance in past studies. The goal of this investigation is evaluate the effectiveness of IS on post-operative clinical outcomes. The aims of this investigation are to evaluate 1) if IS use compliance can be improved by adding a use-recording patient reminder alarm, and 2) the clinical outcomes of the more compliant IS users vs. the less-compliant IS users.
The purpose of this study is to better understand how air is spread throughout study participants' lungs after abdominal surgery by comparing two lung inflation treatments: 1. Incentive Spirometry (I.S.) lung expansion therapy 2. EzPAP® lung expansion therapy. Lung expansion therapy is routinely used after upper abdominal surgery. Taking deep breaths after surgery helps lungs to stay inflated. At the University of Virginia, it is at the physician's discretion as to which treatment will be used to help with deep breathing lung inflation therapy after surgery. The investigators would like to know which of the lung inflation therapies is better at helping inflate participants' lungs. The investigators will be using a device called Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) to measure how effectively air spreads in participants' lungs. This device is not currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the purpose used in this study, and therefore, it is considered investigational. Investigators are inviting eligible participants to consider participating in this study because doctors order Incentive Spirometry as a standard of care following upper abdominal surgery. Information gained from monitoring how air is spread throughout participants' lungs will help investigators to determine if there is a clinical difference and benefit when comparing Incentive Spirometry and EzPAP lung expansion therapies.
To evaluate the use of Incentive Spirometry in Non-critically Ill Hospitalized Patients With Shortness of Breath.
To study objective is to evaluate the impact of use of The MetaNeb® System in clearance of atelectasis, as demonstrated by improvement in chest x-rays. This is a a non-randomized open label study, with all subjects receiving treatment with The MetaNeb® System. Subjects who qualify for enrollment in the study will receive therapy with The MetaNeb® System following the labeled instructions for the device. Details of the treatment including duration and frequency will be defined in treatment procedures.
Anesthesia-induced atelectasis is a well-known entity observed in approximately 68-100% of pediatric patients undergoing general anesthesia. The collapse of dependent lung zones starts with anesthesia induction but can persist for hours or even days after surgery. Such anesthesia-related atelectasis has a number of negative clinical consequences such as the impairment of arterial blood oxygenation and lung mechanics as well as the predisposition for ventilator-associated lung injury. The adjustment of ventilator settings for preventing the occurrence of atelectasis and for reducing pulmonary complications remains controversial. Lung sonography (LUS) plays an important role in diagnosing pulmonary diseases in children, including atelectasis of different origins. LUS has demonstrated its high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing anesthesia-induced atelectasis in children.
This study test whether a lung recruitment maneuver improves the right ventricle performance after cardiopulmonary bypass. Half of the patients received an standard protective ventilation and the other half the same ventilatory pattern after a lung recruitment maneuver.
Perioperative changes in regional ventilation by pulmonary electrical impedance tomography and spirometry will be investigated in patients at risk for postoperative pulmonary complications. Those patients undergo lung and flail chest surgery.