Short Treatment With Omalizumab for Severe Asthma

Asthma Clinical Trial

— SHORTEN  

Official title:

Impact of Omalizumab Withdrawal After a 3 Year Duration Treatment in Well Controlled Severe Allergic Asthma : a Multicentric Randomized Controlled Trial

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT04763447
• Other study ID #: APHP180614
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: Phase 4
• Start date: May 20, 2021
• Est. completion date: May 20, 2025

Study information

• Verified date: January 2024
• Source: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
• Contact: Camille TAILLE, Professor
• Phone: 01 40 25 68 63
• Email: camille.taille[@]aphp.fr
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The optimal duration of the treatment by OMA remains unclear when asthma is well controlled. Data suggest that a large part of patients with well controlled asthma can discontinue OMA therapy without any asthma control deterioration or with an acceptable decrease in asthma control, therefore French experts propose that omalizumab can be given for "3 to 5 yrs if asthma remains well controlled".

The costs related to OMA are high and frequent injections represent severe constraints for patients. For all these reasons, evaluating whether shortening duration of OMA therapy is feasible while maintaining acceptable asthma control is a critical point. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate asthma control after OMA discontinuation after 33 to 63 months of treatment when asthma is well controlled.

Description:

Omalizumab (OMA) is a monoclonal anti IgE antibody, developed for severe uncontrolled allergic asthma. Efficacy of OMA in this indication is well documented in randomized trials as well as in real life studies, reducing the number of severe exacerbations by about 50% and improving asthma control score .

However, despite commercialized since 2006 in France, the optimal duration of the treatment remains unclear when asthma is well controlled. In particular, there is no guideline to apply the "step down theory" to biologics in well controlled patients.

It seems clear that a treatment given for less than one year is associated with an early relapse of the disease. However, in a randomized controlled study including 176 patients, stopping the treatment after 5 years induced a small, but acceptable loss of control (average decrease of asthma control test (ACT) by 2.88 and 1.16 point, p= 0.18), but some patients had uncontrolled asthma when the treatment was stopped. In a smaller cohort of 49 patients in Spain who voluntarily accepted to discontinue OMA treatment after 6 years of therapy, asthma deterioration (defined by one or more exacerbation and any Asthma Control Test change during the 1st year) was observed in 24% of patients during the first year following discontinuation , with a maximal rate of 2 exacerbations/yr. After 4 years of discontinuation, 60% of patients still take advantage of the 6 yrs of treatment with OMA. A retrospective study in France found that 14/26 patients treated for at least 3 years kept the same level of control after discontinuation. All these data suggest that a large part of patients with well controlled asthma can discontinue OMA therapy without any asthma control deterioration or with an acceptable decrease in asthma control.

Inducing long term asthma remissions, rather than complete cure, is one potential goal of biologics. OMA is supposed to have disease modifying effects , explaining why there is a hope for a good asthma control being maintained after discontinuation. For this reason, French experts propose that omalizumab can be given for "3 to 5 yrs if asthma remains well controlled" . After an asthma relapse, OMA can be prescribed again theoretically, but no data regarding clinical response after a "second line" of treatment with the same biologic are available. The question of optimal treatment duration is also questioned with other biologics.

The costs related to OMA are high (estimated to 12 k€/year/patient). Frequent injections (1 subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks for the lowest dose to 4 injections every 2 weeks for the highest dose) represent severe constraints for patients, especially for the youngest ones. For all these reasons, evaluating whether shortening duration of OMA therapy is feasible while maintaining acceptable asthma control is a critical point. The main objective is to demonstrate the non-inferiority (i.e. no more exacerbations at 12 months) of OMA withdrawal attempt compared to OMA continuation in asthma-controlled patients treated for 3 to 5 years with OMA. Secondary objectives are to compare OMA withdrawal attempt versus OMA continuation in asthma-controlled patients treated for 33 to 63 months with OMA on other asthma control features at 6 and 12 months.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 234
• Est. completion date: May 20, 2025
• Est. primary completion date: May 20, 2025
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Adult patient >18 years old

• Treated with OMA, prescribed by a pulmonologist , for 33 to 63 months for severe allergic asthma

• Well controlled with the treatment (ACT score ? 18) and having experienced no more than one exacerbation in the year preceding inclusion. An exacerbation is defined as an oral or injectable steroid course for at least 2 days and/or a minimum doubling of the usual steroid dose for at least 2 days for steroid dependent patients

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patient refusing to stop OMA treatment, whatever the reason

• Patient with other reason other than good asthma control to stop OMA, such as a side effect, planned or ongoing pregnancy, or planned switch to another step 5 asthma treatment (mepolizumab, benralizumab, dupilumab, reslizumab, daily oral steroids, bronchial thermoplasty, …)

• Patient not covered by Health Insurance

• Patient under curatorship, guardianship or safeguarding of justice

• Patient whose adherence to asthma treatments is considered poor or questionable by the investigator

• Patient participating in another intervention research

• Pregnant or lactating patient

• Patient refusing to sign consent

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Asthma

Intervention

Other:
• Attempt to withdrawal OMA treatment
Patients will be told to stop abruptly (no progressive decrease of the dose) their Omalizumab treatment and they will not be prescribed new OMA. In case of loss of control, pulmonologist can adapt asthma treatment, as in usual care. In that case, OMA can be prescribed for a second line

Drug:
• Continuation of OMA treatment
Patients will be prescribed the same dosage of Omalizumab than they received before randomization, according to their weight and total circulating IgE levels. In case of safety concerns or loss of control, pulmonologist can modify the patient treatment regimen of OMA or other co-medications, as in usual care.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
France	Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard	Paris	Île De France

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Country where clinical trial is conducted

France, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Number of exacerbations	Number of asthma exacerbations in the year following randomization. An exacerbation is defined as an oral or injectable steroid course for at least 2 days and/or a minimum doubling of the usual steroid dose for at least 2 days for steroid dependent patients.; They will be assessed every 6 months from patients log book, written reports of ER visits or hospitalizations, and prescriptions	12 months
Secondary	Time to exacerbation	Number of days between the randomization and the first occurence of an exacerbation. An exacerbation is defined as an oral or injectable steroid course for at least 2 days and/or a minimum doubling of the usual steroid dose for at least 2 days for steroid dependent patients.	12 months
Secondary	Asthma control (ACT)	Changes in asthma control test (ACT). ACT is a five questions self-administered standardized questionnaire. The ACT contains 5 questions that are related to the frequency of both asthma symptoms and required rescue medication use during the previous 4 weeks. The scores in the ACT range from 5 (worse control) to 25 (total control). A minimal change in 5 points for the total score is considered clinically significant.	6 months
Secondary	Asthma control (ACT)	Changes in asthma control test (ACT). ACT is a five questions self-administered standardized questionnaire. The ACT contains 5 questions that are related to the frequency of both asthma symptoms and required rescue medication use during the previous 4 weeks. The scores in the ACT range from 5 (worse control) to 25 (total control). A minimal change in 5 points for the total score is considered clinically significant.	12 months
Secondary	5 points-decrease of asthma control (ACT)	Percentage of patients with a 5 points decrease of asthma control test (ACT) compared to baseline. ACT is a five questions self-administered standardized questionnaire. The ACT contains 5 questions that are related to the frequency of both asthma symptoms and required rescue medication use during the previous 4 weeks. The scores in the ACT range from 5 (worse control) to 25 (total control). A minimal change in 5 points for the total score is considered clinically significant.	6 months
Secondary	5 points-decrease of asthma control (ACT)	Percentage of patients with a 5 points decrease of asthma control test (ACT) compared to baseline. ACT is a five questions self-administered standardized questionnaire. The ACT contains 5 questions that are related to the frequency of both asthma symptoms and required rescue medication use during the previous 4 weeks. The scores in the ACT range from 5 (worse control) to 25 (total control). A minimal change in 5 points for the total score is considered clinically significant.	12 months
Secondary	Time to loss of asthma control	Number of days between the randomization and the prescription of OMA (in the withdrawal group) or another step 5 asthma treatment (mepolizumab, benralizumab, daily oral steroids, bronchial thermoplasty); according to the pulmonologist's choice.	12 months
Secondary	Asthma quality of life (AQLQ)	Changes in asthma quality of life (AQLQ). The AQLQ is a 32-item disease-specific questionnaire that has been designed to measure the functional impairments that are most troublesome to adults with asthma. Patients are asked to recall their experiences during the previous 2 weeks and to score each item on a 7-point scale. The overall AQLQ score is the mean response to all 32 questions. Four independent studies have established that the AQLQ has strong measurement properties and validity.	6 months
Secondary	Asthma quality of life (AQLQ)	Changes in asthma quality of life (AQLQ). The AQLQ is a 32-item disease-specific questionnaire that has been designed to measure the functional impairments that are most troublesome to adults with asthma. Patients are asked to recall their experiences during the previous 2 weeks and to score each item on a 7-point scale. The overall AQLQ score is the mean response to all 32 questions. Four independent studies have established that the AQLQ has strong measurement properties and validity.	12 months
Secondary	Number of asthma controller drugs	Changes in the number of asthma controller drugs	6 months
Secondary	Number of asthma controller drugs	Changes in the number of asthma controller drugs	12 months
Secondary	Dose of inhaled steroids	Changes in the mean daily dose of inhaled steroids received in the 3 previous months	6 months
Secondary	Dose of inhaled steroids	Changes in the mean daily dose of inhaled steroids received in the 3 previous	12 months
Secondary	Dose of oral steroids	Changes in the mean daily dose of oral steroids (for steroid dependent patients)	6 months
Secondary	Dose of oral steroids	Changes in the mean daily dose of oral steroids (for steroid dependent patients)	12 months
Secondary	Patients increasing their dose of oral steroids of 20%	Percentage of patients with a 20% increasing of the dose compared to baseline (for steroid dependent patients)	6 months
Secondary	Patients increasing their dose of oral steroids of 20%	Percentage of patients with a 20% increasing of the dose compared to baseline (for steroid dependent patients)	12 months
Secondary	Patients increasing their dose of oral steroids of 50%	Percentage of patients with a 50% increasing of the dose compared to baseline (for steroid dependent patients)	6 months
Secondary	Patients increasing their dose of oral steroids of 50%	Percentage of patients with a 50% increasing of the dose compared to baseline (for steroid dependent patients)	12 months
Secondary	Patients increasing their dose of oral steroids of 80%	Percentage of patients with a 80% increasing of the dose compared to baseline (for steroid dependent patients)	6 months
Secondary	Patients increasing their dose of oral steroids of 80%	Percentage of patients with a 80% increasing of the dose compared to baseline (for steroid dependent patients)	12 months
Secondary	Allergy manifestations	Occurrence of food allergy (oral syndrome and anaphylactic reactions), conjunctivitis, rhinitis, atopic dermatitis	6 months
Secondary	Allergy manifestations	Occurrence of food allergy (oral syndrome and anaphylactic reactions), conjunctivitis, rhinitis, atopic dermatitis	12 months
Secondary	FEV1	Changes in FEV1	6 months
Secondary	FEV1	Changes in FEV1	12 months
Secondary	Effect of OMA treatment duration on asthma control	Effet of OMA treatment duration before randomization on ACT score. The following categories will be considered: [3-4 years[; [4-5 years]	12 months
Secondary	Effect of OMA dosage on asthma control	Effet of OMA dosage before randomization on ACT score. The following categories will be considered: [150-300 mg/month]; ]300-600 mg/month];]600-900 mg/month] and ]900-1200 mg/month]	12 months
Secondary	Effect of eosinophils rate on asthma control	Effet of OMA eosinophils rate at randomization on ACT score. The following categories will be considered: <300/mm3;=300/mm3.	12 months
Secondary	Effect of OMA treatment duration on time to loss of asthma control	Effet of OMA treatment duration before randomization on time to loss of asthma control. Time to loss of asthma control is defined as the number of days between the randomization and the prescription of OMA (in the withdrawal group) or another step 5 asthma treatment (mepolizumab, benralizumab, daily oral steroids, bronchial thermoplasty); according to the pulmonologist's choice. The following categories will be considered: [3-4 years[; [4-5 years]	12 months
Secondary	Effect of OMA dosage on time to loss of asthma control	Effet of OMA dosage before randomization on time to loss of asthma control. Time to loss of asthma control is defined as the number of days between the randomization and the prescription of OMA (in the withdrawal group) or another step 5 asthma treatment (mepolizumab, benralizumab, daily oral steroids, bronchial thermoplasty); according to the pulmonologist's choice. The following categories will be considered: [150-300 mg/month]; ]300-600 mg/month];]600-900 mg/month] and ]900-1200 mg/month]	12 months
Secondary	Effect of eosinophils rate on time to loss of asthma control	Effet of OMA eosinophils rate at randomization on time to loss of asthma control. Time to loss of asthma control is defined as the number of days between the randomization and the prescription of OMA (in the withdrawal group) or another step 5 asthma treatment (mepolizumab, benralizumab, daily oral steroids, bronchial thermoplasty); according to the pulmonologist's choice. The following categories will be considered: <300/mm3;=300/mm3.	12 months
Secondary	Effect of OMA treatment duration on exacerbations	Effet of OMA treatment duration before randomization on exacerbations. An exacerbation is defined as an oral or injectable steroid course for at least 2 days and/or a minimum doubling of the usual steroid dose for at least 2 days for steroid dependent patients. The following categories will be considered: [3-4 years[; [4-5 years]	12 months
Secondary	Effect of OMA dosage on exacerbations	Effet of OMA dosage before randomization on exacerbations.An exacerbation is defined as an oral or injectable steroid course for at least 2 days and/or a minimum doubling of the usual steroid dose for at least 2 days for steroid dependent patients. The following categories will be considered: [150-300 mg/month]; ]300-600 mg/month];]600-900 mg/month] and ]900-1200 mg/month]	12 months
Secondary	Effect of eosinophils rate on exacerbations	Effet of OMA eosinophils rate at randomization on exacerbations. An exacerbation is defined as an oral or injectable steroid course for at least 2 days and/or a minimum doubling of the usual steroid dose for at least 2 days for steroid dependent patients.The following categories will be considered: <300/mm3;=300/mm3.	12 months
Secondary	Hospitalisation for asthma	Number of hospitalisations for asthma in the year following randomization.	12 months
Secondary	Emergency room visits for asthma	Emergency room visits for asthma in the year following randomization.	12 months
Secondary	St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)	Changes in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). The SGRQ is self-administered and includes 50 items in three components: symptoms, activity, and impact on daily life. The SGRQ scores range from 0 to 100, with 0 indicating no impairment in the quality of life. Higher scores on the SGRQ indicating the worst quality of life. In cohort studies, a change of four points in the total score is considered clinically significant. Many studies have established that the SGRQ is a relevant, comprehensive and content-valid instrument to assess health status in patients with severe asthma.	6 months
Secondary	St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)	Changes in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). The SGRQ is self-administered and includes 50 items in three components: symptoms, activity, and impact on daily life. The SGRQ scores range from 0 to 100, with 0 indicating no impairment in the quality of life. Higher scores on the SGRQ indicating the worst quality of life. In cohort studies, a change of four points in the total score is considered clinically significant. Many studies have established that the SGRQ is a relevant, comprehensive and content-valid instrument to assess health status in patients with severe asthma	12 months