View clinical trials related to Ascites.
Filter by:Assessment of effectiveness, safety and local immune activation of Oncolytic Viruses H101 in patients with refractory malignant ascites.
A Randomized, Multicenter,Open-label, positive-controlled, Multi-dose Phase 1 Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerance,Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics and Immunogenicity of recombinant human albumin injection in Patients With Hepatic Cirrhosis
This study is being completed for patients with cirrhosis, including patients with a prior history of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) to evaluate the feasibility and benefits of medically-tailored meals as an intervention. Patients will be enrolled from the University of Michigan and will complete the baseline assessments in-person or remotely. In addition participants will complete study related materials before, during and after treatment with medically-tailored meals (MTM). After completing the study meals, participants will return for follow-up or have this visit completed remotely as well as have an observational period for 12 more weeks.
This clinical trial is evaluating the feasibility of using a non-pharmaceutical treatment to improve the symptoms and severity of muscle cramps in patients with cirrhosis. Eligible participants will be randomized to the treatment arm or control group. The treatment phase of the study will last 28 days. Information about participants will be collected including surveys and assessments throughout the study. Please note that only the participants randomized to experimental intervention group (Household Remedy) will be told what the treatment is during the study period. At the conclusion of the study (time of the final follow-up assessments), all participants will be debriefed on the use of concealment in this study as outlined in the protocol regarding the intervention.
A phase I, single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled single dose escalation study, and a positive-controlled multiple dose extension study to evaluate the safety, tolerance, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of recombinant human albumin injection in healthy subjects
Refractory ascites (fluid build up in the abdomen that can not bet managed by medications) occurs in at least 10% of patients with end stage liver disease (cirrhosis). Two major options for management include large volume paracentesis (LVP)-drainage with a needle through the abdominal wall) and placement of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS)-re-directs blood flow across the cirrhotic liver), Not all patients are candidates for TIPS or transplant, are left with LVP as the only long-term treatment option. Patients listed for transplant require LVP while they wait for transplant. LVP can cause pain, bleeding, leakage from the drain site and frequent hospital visits which result in health care cost as well as patient and caregiver fatigue. In between the drains, living with ascites can negatively affect quality of life because of discomfort and limitations. Patients with ascites are more malnourished than those without. Specialized drains tunnelled under the skin, are used in patents with ascites due to cancer (malignant). There are not many studies evaluating these drains in patients with cirrhosis, One of the reasons for the lack of studies is the potential for infection. As opposed to malignant ascites, cirrhotic ascites generally has a low protein content, a risk factor for development of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP). From available studies, infection rates in cirrhotic patients with tunnelled drains who are not on antibiotics are estimated at 10% (4/40). Infection rates on antibiotic prophylaxis would be expected to be lower. This pilot study includes the evaluation of indwelling tunnelled PleurX catheters as an alternative option. The hypothesis is that with careful monitoring of kidney function and prevention of infection with antibiotics, PleurX catheters will be safe, cost-effective and improve quality of life and nutritional status compared to the standard of care.
Colorectal cancers are the third most common type of cancer in the world. Peritoneal carcinomatosis and intraabdominal acid development occur in advanced stages of colorectal cancers. It is known that the immune system plays an important role in tumor development or tumor eradication. Among the mechanisms of escape from the immune system, changes in the tumor microenvironment play an important role. Immune checkpoints are molecules that have become popular especially after the Nobel Prize in 2018, and are important in revealing the relationship between cancer and the immune system. In our study, it is aimed to evaluate whether there is a difference in intraabdominal ascites fluid immune checkpoints level in patients with advanced colorectal cancer patients compared to patients without malignancy.
Lung cancer is a common cancer, associated with a high mortality rate. Pleural effusions are common in lung cancer, developing in up to 40% of patients. Ascites is common in patients with abdominal malignancies and can be the presenting feature in up to 50% of patients. There is a need for new techniques to improve our diagnostic ability of cancer. FTIR technology could enable a point-of-care test that would provide an initial diagnosis that may determine a change in treatment at the time of the investigation.
A Phase 1 randomized, double blinded, placebo-controlled single dose escalation study of OsrHSA in adult healthy male and female volunteers
Paracentesis is a bedside procedure in which a needle is inserted into a patient's peritoneum in order to obtain ascitic fluid. This is a safe bedside procedure with very low risks of complications that is usually performed using physical exam maneuvers to determine the site of needle insertion. Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) technology has improved the safety of central venous catheter insertion and thoracentesis, yet the data on safety in paracentesis is equivocal. In a practical study, we aim to determine if POCUS will change the needle insertion site over the traditional anatomic landmarking method. Operators will landmark for paracentesis using conventional physical exam and then utilize POCUS to determine if there is a more optimal site. The primary endpoint will be whether POCUS yielded a change in the needle insertion site, as defined by a location greater than 5cm from the anatomic site, at least 20% of the time. The results will further our understanding of POCUS in improving procedural safety, thereby adding to the currently limited literature on this topic. Furthermore, this study will inform residency training programs about the utility in POCUS training for paracentesis and may advocate for the availability of POCUS devices to physicians performing this procedure.