View clinical trials related to Ascites.
Filter by:The goal of this observational study is to learn about the performance of the drainova® ArgentiC Catheter in clinical routine, which is used to treat fluid accumulations in hollow body structures. The device is already on the market and participants receive the catheter as part of their regular treatment. The main questions of this study are: - Does the device function as intended? - Are there any other safety risks that have not been identified? - Does it lower the symptoms of the patients as intended? Doctors and patients will answer questions regarding the improvement of the patients´ symptoms and if there were any problems with the catheter.
1. More than half of peritoneal metastases are from digestive tract. Peritoneal metastasis has poor prognosis, poor treatment response and limited means. 2. rmhTNF-NC or bevacizumab are effective in the treatment of malignant pleuroabdominal effusion. 3, There is increasing evidence that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in combination with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) inhibitors have a complementary mechanism of action: VEGF pathway inhibitors normalize blood vessels in tumors and promote immune cell maturation and infiltration, thus playing a synergistic role with ICIs. The strategy of systemic immunotherapy combined with antivascular therapy has been confirmed by several large phase III clinical trials such as IMbrave-150. Basic studies have confirmed that uncontrolled tumor vessels in peritoneal metastasis and malignant ascites microenvironment also play an important role in promoting disease progression. Therefore, this project intends to explore the treatment of malignant abdominal effusion by local intraperitoneal injection of bevacizumab and PD-1 on the basis of rmhTNF-NC
A Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center Phase III Clinical Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Recombinant Anti-EpCAM and Anti-CD3 Human-Mouse Chimeric Bispecific Antibody (M701) for Intraperitoneal Injection to Paracentesis alone in Patients with Malignant Ascites Caused by Advanced Epithelial Solid Tumors.
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of NK042 for treatment of malignant ascites.
To explore the consistency between result of PTC drug screening tests and actual clinical outcome for patients with advanced malignancy.
This study was a Phase II/III multicenter, blinded, and positiveactive-controlled clinical study with seamless adaptive design to evaluate the dose-response relationship, safety, and immunogenicity of recombinant human albumin(rHA) injection for the treatment of hypoalbuminemia in cirrhotic patients with ascites, and to provide a reference for the design of the Phase III clinical study.
Liver cirrhosis is the clinical end stage of different entities of chronic liver disease when patients suffer from considerable mortality and morbidity, both of which are correlated positively with disease severity. Ascites are the most common complication, and around 60% of patients with compensated cirrhosis develop ascites within 10 years of disease onset (D'Amico et al., 2015). Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) which is defined by acute infection of ascitic fluid, an abnormal accumulation of fluid in the abdomen without a distinct or identifiable source of infection, with ascitic fluid absolute neutrophil count >250 cells/mm³, whether or not there is culture growth. is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in cirrhotic patients with ascites. SBP is estimated to affect 10-30% of cirrhotic patients hospitalized with ascites, and mortality in this group approaches 30%. Many of these patients are asymptomatic, and it is therefore recommended that all patients with ascites undergo paracentesis at the time of admission to confirm the SBP status. Although SBP is less prevalent in an outpatient setting, it is reasonable to also evaluate the ascitic fluid of outpatients because of the high mortality associated with SBP Platelets are considered an important source of pro-thrombotic agents associated with inflammatory markers and play a role in the initiation and propagation of inflammatory diseases. Platelets with large sizes have many granules that can exert their hemostatic and proinflammatory actions with greater efficiency. For these reasons, the mean platelet volume (MPV) and platelet distribution width (PDW) may be considered indicators of platelet function and activation (Abdelmoez et al., 2016). MPV and PDW are routine tests that are a part of a complete blood count. An increase in MPV has been observed in chronic viral hepatitis because of an increase in the entry of newly produced platelets into circulation, which are larger in volume than the old platelets (Castellote et al., 2008; Suvak et al., 2013). Therefore, mean platelet volume and platelet distribution width measurement may be used in predicting spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (Gálvez-Martínez et al., 2015; Abdelmoez et al., 2017). The blood neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a crucial parameter for the balance of the inflammatory and immune systems, reflecting responses to systemic inflammation In patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis, NLR is a non-invasive marker that can be used to predict the occurrence of hospital infection (Cai et al., 2017), NLR is a predictor of SBP that can be utilized in combination with other markers. According to (Mousa et al., 2016), blood NLR > 2.89 had an 80.3% sensitivity and 88.9% specificity for diagnosing SBP, while blood NLR and CRP combined (cut-off 11.3 mg/dL) had a 95.1% sensitivity and 96.3% specificity (Mousa et al., 2016). Although single tests have shown some value in predicting SBP, their studies have been small and inconsistent. In order to predict SBP in patients with cirrhotic ascites, prediction scores in conjunction with clinical and laboratory indicators are therefore being developed recently (Dahiya et al., 2023; Wehmeyer et al., 2014). In summary, Infections are common in liver cirrhosis patients, and SBP is one of the most prevalent, with varying frequency but a significant fatality rate. One of the most crucial factors in treating this significant consequence of decompensated liver cirrhosis is early detection. Finding non-invasive, affordable, and simple-to-implement parameters related to SBP that have a predictive role is essential. However, need to be kept in mind these methods cannot completely replace paracentesis, more studies are needed to determine whether non-invasive methods are sufficiently accurate to identify the development of SBP in cirrhosis.
A Phase II, Randomized, Open-label, Controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of M701 in treating Patients with Malignant Ascites Caused by Gastrointestinal or Ovarian Cancer combined with Systemic Therapy.
Patients with advanced cirrhosis of the liver develop kidney problems occasionally. This condition is called Hepatorenal Syndrome, requires hospitalization and frequently results in death. The goal of this clinical trial is to test whether the administration of low doses of ambrisentan can help patients with Hepatorenal Syndrome and to determine if it is safe. Ambrisentan is a drug that is approved for the treatment of high blood pressure in the lungs at higher doses. This clinical trial will compare the safety and effects of ambrisentan to another drug called terlipressin, which is commonly used to treat patients with hepatorenal syndrome. The main questions the clinical trial aims to answer are: - Does ambrisentan help the kidney function of the patient? - Does ambrisentan help prevent death in patients with Hepatorenal Syndrome? - Does ambrisentan prevent Hepatorenal Syndrome from reappearing? While in the hospital, trial participants will receive either one of two doses of ambrisentan or terlipressin. If in the first 4 days, ambrisentan is not helpful, the patient may be eligible to receive terlipressin. Patients assigned to receive ambrisentan will continue taking this medication at home after leaving the hospitals and until they complete 60 days of treatment.
The project is about evaluation of albumin and midodrine versus midodrine alone in outcome of recurrent ascites in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Cirrhosis occcurs in 50% of patients over 10 years. The mortality is approximately 40% at 1 year and 50% at 2 years (12.7 per 100,000 population). A lot of times the prognosis is poor and the main factors leading to it are - acute kidney injury, hepatorenal syndrome, hyponatremia, grade of ascites-recurrent ascites, sarcopenia, low mean arterial pressure. Post review of the literature, it is realized that there are some gap areas - - It is unknown whether combination of vasoconstrictor with albumin versus vasoconstrictor alone is superior for ascites resolution in patients with recurrent ascites. - There are no studies till date on using combination of vasoconstrictor with albumin versus vasoconstrictor alone in patients with recurrent ascites. - There are no studies on impact of combining vasoconstrictor and albumin in preventing the development of AKI and chronic kidney disease in these patients. In an effort to bridge these gap areas, this project works on the following hypothesis - "Midodrine would have a synergistic effect with albumin in improving the systemic hemodynamics and circulatory dysfunction and will cause rapid control of ascites, reduce the incidence of large volume paracentesis (LVP), complications, reduce the incidence of chronic kidney disease (HRS-CKD) and improve outcome of patients with recurrent ascites in patients with decompensated cirrhosis as compared to midodrine alone" Primary objective: To assess the effect of midodrine alone vs. a combination of midodrine and albumin on the survival free of TIPS and liver transplant at 6 months Secondary objective: The effect of midodrine alone vs. combination of midodrine and albumin on the cumulative frequency of therapeutic paracentesis at 6 and 12 months Proportion of patients achieving control of ascites at 6 and 12 months