View clinical trials related to Arthroscopy.
Filter by:The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of adding dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine in ultrasound (US) guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) for managing acute postoperative pain in patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy.
This study describes the changes in preference to arthroscopic surgery in two orthopedics departments in Denmark under the COVID-19 pandemic.
the aim is to compare the effects of two different doses of intraarticular ketamine on postoperative pain scores and analgesic requirements.in knee artroscopy
Protocol synopsis Title of Study: A Prospective, Randomized, Multi-Center Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Q-Fix All-Suture Anchor in Arthroscopic Repair of Shoulder Soft Tissue in Chinese Patients Study Design: Prospective, multicenter, comparative, randomized, concurrent control Study Type: Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) Study Product: Q-Fix All-Suture Anchor Comparison Group Twinfix Ti Suture Anchor Study Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Q-Fix All-suture Anchor in patients requiring the repair of soft tissue of shoulder who receive the arthroscopic repair of soft tissue using Q-Fix All-suture Anchor, when compared with the patients receiving the treatment with Twinfix Ti Suture Anchor. The result of this trial will be used for the Q-Fix All-suture Anchor registration in China. Primary Objective: The primary objective of this study is to confirm that the clinical outcome of subjects receiving the treatment with Q-Fix All-suture Anchor is non-inferior to that of the subjects receiving the treatment with Twinfix Ti Suture Anchor during the same period, at 6 months after the repair of soft tissue of shoulder, taking the mean Constant score as efficacy endpoint. Secondary Objective(s): The secondary objective of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of Q-Fix All-suture Anchor at 12 months after repair of soft tissue of shoulder. Statistical Rationale: The primary efficacy endpoint of this study is Constant score at 6 months after operation. The non-inferiority testing is performed for efficiency of primary efficacy endpoint; the test hypothesis is as follows: Invalid hypothesis: H0: μ1-μ2 ≤ -δ Alternative hypothesis: H1: μ1-μ2 > -δ Where, μ1 and μ2 are the mean Constant scores in the test and control group, respectively. δ is the non-inferiority margin, which is set to 10. The hypothesis will be tested by two-sided t-test at the alpha level of α=0.025 (one-tailed test). the A non-inferior test will be conducted on the Constant scores in the test and control groups. The 95% confidence interval for the difference between two groups will be calculated. If the lower limit of 95%CI for the efficiency difference between two groups is greater than -9, it is considered that the test group is non-inferior to the control group. Sample Size: 128 (64 in each group) Number of Study Sites: Approximate 5 clinical sites Targeted Global Regions: China
This proposal aims to measure the quality of recovery and quality of pain management after shoulder surgery before and after implementation of a multimodal pain protocol.
Intubation is needed in general anesthesia and appropriate cuff pressure is important to avoid trauma or postoperative sore throat and aspiration. Shoulder arthroscope uses some amount of irrigation fluid and it can influence to cuff pressure. Therefore, we will measure cuff pressure during shoulder arthroscope.
This study aims to investigate the analgesic effects offered by bupivacaine and Durolane (a hyaluronic acid supplement) administered immediately following the completion of knee arthroscopy.
To compare total analgesic use at 24 hours after arthroscopic knee surgery in celecoxib-treated versus placebo-treated patients
To compare the total analgesic use at 24 hours after arthroscopic knee surgery in patients treated with celecoxib versus placebo.
A poor outcome in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is often related to tunnel position. The researchers believe that improving the accuracy of tunnel position will lead to an improved outcome in ACL surgery. The researchers' purpose is to perform a controlled study on a series of 500 patients in two groups: group I (250 cases) using conventional instrumentation and group II (250 cases) using navigation (Surgetics ACL Julliard protocol).