Arthroplasty Clinical Trial
Official title:
Randomized, Prospective, Multi-Center Study of the INHANCE Stemless Total Reverse Shoulder System
2:1 Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Prospective, Pre-Market Study of the INHANCE Stemless Reverse Cementless Total Shoulder.
Status | Not yet recruiting |
Enrollment | 168 |
Est. completion date | April 27, 2028 |
Est. primary completion date | November 10, 2027 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 22 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. Individuals requiring reverse total shoulder replacement for a severely painful, disabling, arthritic joint (i.e. osteoarthritis, post-traumatic arthritis and rotator cuff arthropathy). 2. Individuals who are anatomically and structurally suited to receive the implants and have a functional deltoid muscle. 3. Individuals who are able to read and comprehend the informed patient consent document and are willing and able to provide informed patient consent for participation in the study and have authorized the transfer of their information to DePuy Synthes. 4. Individuals who are willing and able to return for follow-up as specified by the study protocol. 5. Individuals who are a minimum age of 22 years at the time of consent. 6. Individuals who are willing and able to complete the Patient Reported Outcome Measure questionnaires (PROMs) as specified by the study protocol. Exclusion Criteria: 1. BMI > 40 kg/m2 2. Individuals have active, uncontrolled local infection or systemic infection. 3. Patients who have not reached skeletal maturity, regardless of age. 4. Either preoperatively or intraoperatively and per standard of care medical assessment, bone stock in the proximal humerus or glenoid fossa is determined to be inadequate for supporting the INHANCE humeral stemless components (NOTE: exclusion applies to both arms of the study, i.e., bone stock to be evaluated independent of randomized treatment assignment). 5. Intraoperatively and per treating physician's assessment of bone quality, bone is determined to be too soft or porous to support the implant or that is too hard or brittle to allow for proper bone preparation and fixation, i.e. osteoporosis or sclerotic bone, or tumor(s) of the supporting bone structure, where there could be considerable migration of the prosthesis and/or a chance of fracture of the humerus or glenoid. 6. Fractures of the proximal humerus that could compromise the fixation of the INHANCE reverse humeral stemless components. 7. Patients who have undergone previous treatment on the study shoulder that may compromise fixation of the INHANCE reverse humeral stemless component. 8. Revision of a failed hemi, total or reverse shoulder arthroplasty. 9. Patient is receiving, or is scheduled to receive, treatment that the Investigator considers could affect bone quality, such as chemotherapy or high dose corticosteroids. 10. Individuals who are bedridden per the Investigator's determination. 11. Individuals that have participated in a clinical investigation with an investigational product (drug or device) in the last three months. 12. Individuals currently involved in any personal injury litigation, medical-legal or worker's compensation claims. 13. Individuals, in the opinion of the Investigator, who are drug or alcohol abusers or have psychological disorders that could affect their ability to complete patient reported questionnaires or be compliant with follow-up requirements. 14. Patients with a known medical condition that the Investigator believes would impact the study outcomes (including, but not limited to osteomyelitis, Paget's disease, neuropathies such as Charcot's disease, metastatic or neoplastic disorders). 15. Patient has a medical condition with less than 2 years life expectancy. 16. Patients who are known to be pregnant or breastfeeding. 17. Known polyethylene and/or metal sensitivity or allergy. 18. Contralateral side has been enrolled in the study or has received a total shoulder operation within the last 6 months 19. Otherwise determined by the investigator to be medically unsuitable for participation in this study 20. Patient is a member of a vulnerable population (i.e., incarcerated individuals - those incarcerated for at least one month and considered to be an inmate) |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | St. Luke's University Health Network | Bethlehem | Pennsylvania |
United States | OrthoCarolina Research Institute Charlotte | Charlotte | North Carolina |
United States | Lindner Research Center | Cincinnati | Ohio |
United States | Cleveland Clinic | Cleveland | Ohio |
United States | Missouri Orthopaedic Institute (MOI) | Columbia | Missouri |
United States | MTBJ a division of Tennessee Orthaepedic Alliance | Columbia | Tennessee |
United States | Slocum Center for Orthpaedics and Sports Medicine | Eugene | Oregon |
United States | Trinity Health Grand Rapids | Grand Rapids | Michigan |
United States | Hoag Orthopedic Institute | Irvine | California |
United States | Atlantis Orthopaedics | Lake Worth | Florida |
United States | Cedars Sinai Medical Center | Los Angeles | California |
United States | TOSH- The Orthopedic Specialty Hospital | Murray | Utah |
United States | Rothman Orthopaedics Institute | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania |
United States | University of Utah | Salt Lake City | Utah |
United States | Boston Sports & Shoulder Center | Waltham | Massachusetts |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
DePuy Orthopaedics |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | Constant Murley Score (CMS) | Change from baseline adjusted Constant-Murley Score at 3- and 6-months and 1- year post-operative. The CMS is a 100 point scale, the higher the score, the higher the quality of the function. ACM will be obtained by dividing the raw score by the relative score. | Pre-op, 3-month, 6-month, 1 year | |
Other | EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS | Change from baseline EQ-5D-5L Value Score and EQ-VAS, at 3- and 6-months and 1- and 2-years post-operative. The value score generally ranges from less than 0 to 1, with higher scores indicating higher health utility. The EQ VAS records the subject's self-rated health from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). | Pre-op, 3-month, 6-month, 1 year, 2 year | |
Other | Simple Shoulder Test | Change from baseline SST Scores at 3- and 6-months and 1- and 2-years post-operative. Scores range from 0 (worst) to 12 (best). | Pre-op, 3-month, 6-month, 1 year, 2 year | |
Other | Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) Score | Change from baseline SANE Scores at 3- and 6-months and 1- and 2-years post-operative. The scale is 0 to 100 with 100 being "normal". | Pre-op, 3-month, 6-month, 1 year, 2 year | |
Other | Range of Motion | Change from baseline range of motion at 3- and 6-months and 1- and 2-years post-operative | Pre-op, 3-month, 6-month, 1 year, 2 year | |
Primary | Constant Murley Score (CMS) | Primary effectiveness endpoint - Adjusted Constant-Murley Change from Baseline (ACM CFB) at 2 years post-operative. The CMS is a 100 point scale, the higher the score, the higher the quality of the function. ACM will be obtained by dividing the raw score by the relative score. | Pre-op, 2 years | |
Primary | Removal of any system component | No removal of any system component | 2 year | |
Primary | Revision of any system component | No revision of any system component | 2 year | |
Primary | Reoperation of any system component | No reoperation of any system component | 2 year | |
Primary | Supplemental Fixation of any system component | No supplemental fixation of any system component | 2 year | |
Primary | Radiolucent Lines (Humeral & Glenoid) | No humeral or glenoid radiolucent line greater than 2mm is present in 50% or more zones | 2 year | |
Primary | Migration and Tilt (Humeral & Glenoid) | No conclusive evidence of migration and tilt (greater than 5mm migration and greater than 10 degrees tilt) of the humeral or glenoid component | 2 year | |
Secondary | Constant Murley Score (CMS) | Adjusted Constant-Murley Score at baseline and 3- and 6-months and 1- and 2-years post-operative. The CMS is a 100 point scale, the higher the score, the higher the quality of the function. ACM will be obtained by dividing the raw score by the relative score. | Pre-op, 3-month, 6-month, 1 year, 2 year | |
Secondary | EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS | EQ-5D-5L Scores by dimension and EQ-VAS, at baseline and 3- and 6-months and 1- and 2-years post-operative. The value score generally ranges from less than 0 to 1, with higher scores indicating higher health utility. The EQ VAS records the subject's self-rated health from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). | Pre-op, 3-month, 6-month, 1 year, 2 year | |
Secondary | Simple Shoulder Test | Simple Shoulder Test (SST) Scores at baseline and 3- and 6-months and 1- and 2-years post-operative. Scores range from 0 (worst) to 12 (best). | Pre-op, 3-month, 6-month, 1 year, 2 year | |
Secondary | Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) Score | Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) Scores at baseline and 3- and 6-months and 1- and 2-years post-operative. The scale is 0 to 100 with 100 being "normal". | Pre-op, 3-month, 6-month, 1 year, 2 year | |
Secondary | Survivorship | Overall survivorship of the INHANCE Shoulder System at 2 years post-operative, where the system is deemed to be surviving if no components (humeral stem or stemless component, glenosphere, baseplate, liner, etc.) have been removed for any reason, will be presented using the Kaplan-Meier method. | 2 year | |
Secondary | Complications | The type and frequency of all reportable adverse events (AEs) and device deficiencies in this study will be summarized, with distinction of serious AEs, device and procedure related AEs | 2 year |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT00762944 -
Total Temporomandibular Joint Replacement System Post Approval Study
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05015101 -
Evaluation of the Clinical and Radiological Outcome of Uncemented Femoral Stems According to Their Proximal Coating
|
||
Completed |
NCT02554149 -
Radiological Measurement of Femoral Stem Version Using Lateral Decubitus Method: A Prospective Study
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02713906 -
Materialise X-ray Knee Guides for Total Knee Arthroplasty
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02828293 -
Understanding GMK Sphere Implant Tibiofemoral Kinematics by Means of Dynamic Videofluoroscopy
|
||
Completed |
NCT02829866 -
AMIStem-H Radiographic Analysis
|
||
Terminated |
NCT00683267 -
Efficacy and Safety Study of 4975 in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Replacement
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04516239 -
Comparison of Metal on Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty and Metal on Metal Total Hip Resurfacing.
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04480320 -
Sonography-guided Pericapsular Never Group Block for Hip Arthroplasty
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04906681 -
Implementation of a Rehabilitation Technology in Orthopedic and Neurological Rehabilitation to Increase Therapy Dosage: an Exploratory Study
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04403919 -
Knotless Suture in Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03132831 -
Influence of the Operative Day on the Average Duration of Stay in Primary Hip and Knee Replacements
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03339557 -
Comparison of Three Knee Replacements
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02578446 -
Uncemented Tritanium Compared With Cemented Metal-backed Tibia Components in Total Knee Replacement
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT00756483 -
Stability Plus - Outcomes From Extended Continuum of Care
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT00364533 -
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of Tapentadol(CG5503) in the Treatment of Acute Pain After Hip Replacement Surgery Compared With Oxycodone and Placebo Followed by a Voluntary Open-Label Extension For Safety
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT04089371 -
A Post-Market Clinical Evaluation of the ReUnion Reversible Fracture (RFX) System
|
||
Completed |
NCT05248854 -
Effects of Sensorimotor and Core Stabilization Exercises After Total Knee Arthroplasty
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02465684 -
Effect of Tourniquet on UKA
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03450681 -
Effectiveness of Pulsed Radiofrequency of the Saphenous Nerve in the Management of Knee Arthroplasty Pain
|
N/A |