View clinical trials related to Apnea.
Filter by:Clinical Trial Phase IV Indication: Moderate-severe obstructive sleep apnea and dyslipidemia. Objectives: Main objective: To test whether 12 months of CPAP treatment associated with conventional pharmacological treatment improves the lipid profile of patients with dyslipidemia and moderate to severe OSA. Secondary objectives: - To test whether 12 months of treatment with CPAP associated with conventional pharmacological treatment improves serum uric acid concentration in patients with dyslipidemia and moderate-severe OSA. - To determine the additional medium- and long-term effect of CPAP on insulin resistance in patients with dyslipidemia and moderate-severe OSA. - To evaluate the impact of CPAP treatment on cardiovascular risk reduction in patients with dyslipidemia and moderate-severe OSA. - To analyze the impact of supplemental CPAP treatment on glycemic control and C-reactive protein concentration in patients with dyslipidemia and moderate-severe OSA. - To establish the impact of supplemental CPAP therapy on health-related quality of life in patients with dyslipidemia and moderate-severe OSA. - To evaluate the effect of CPAP on inflammatory cytokines, oxidative stress biomarkers, sympathetic tone and intake-regulating hormones in patients with dyslipidemia and moderate-severe OSA. - To relate CPAP-induced changes in serum lipid and uric acid concentration to changes in basal inflammatory response, oxidative stress, sympathetic activity, and intake-regulating hormones. - To identify the subgroup of patients with dyslipidemia and moderate-severe OSA in whom 12 months of CPAP treatment achieves a more marked reduction in serum lipids and uric acid. Design Randomized, parallel-group, nonblinded, controlled clinical trial with conventional treatment. Study population Subjects aged 35 to 80 years with a diagnosis of dyslipidemia made at least six months ago and with moderate-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) not requiring CPAP treatment according to conventional indications. Sample size: 110 patients in each treatment arm. Treatment Patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of the following treatment arms: 1. Conventional hygienic-dietary recommendations and promotion of daily physical activity. 2. Conventional hygienic-dietary recommendations and promotion of daily physical activity, plus treatment with positive airway pressure (CPAP). Efficiency variables - Main variables: LDL-cholesterol and uric acid. - Total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol and triglycerides. - Basal blood glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), creatinine and C-reactive protein. - Systemic biomarkers: inflammatory (IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-α), oxidative stress (8-isoprostane), endothelial damage (endothelin, VCAM-1 and ICAM-1), sympathetic activity (neuropeptide Y) and appetite-regulating hormones (leptin, orexin A/hypocretin 1 and ghrelin). - Clinical questionnaires: SF-12, EuroQoL, FOSQ and IPAQ. Safety variables - Clinical adverse event reporting. - CPAP compliance (average hours of use per day). - Epworth Sleepiness Questionnaire. - Development of cardiovascular events.
To compare the blood pressure control and cognitive responses of three groups of patients: those diagnosed with Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) and treated with Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) for at least six months, those diagnosed with OSA but not treated, and those without OSA.
Additional data on screening for obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) in patients with co-morbidities, such as diabetics and those with chronic respiratory diseases would enable current recommendations to evolve, with a view to promoting the widespread use of simplified techniques for OSAHS screening, particularly in patients with cardiorespiratory co-morbidities. The primary objective of this observational multicentric pilot study is to compare the performance of the Sunrise® medical device with that of ventilatory polygraphy as part of routine screening for OSAHS in diabetic patients followed up in the diabetology department of the Strasbourg University Hospital, and in patients followed up in the pneumology consultation department of Mulhouse Hospital (GHRMSA).
The goal of this observational study is to further evaluate the efficacy and mechanism of action of the Cryosa Procedure, a novel procedure intended to treat obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The patient population includes participants with OSA who are enrolled in the ARCTIC-3 study and are undergoing the Cryosa Procedure. The main questions we aim to answer are: (1) evaluate predictors of successful treatment with the Cryosa Procedure, which is described in more detail in the ARCTIC-3 protocol (IRB #854182), and (2) evaluate a potential mechanism of action of this novel therapy. We hypothesize that higher baseline quantities of oropharyngeal fat and higher baseline upper airway neurotonic activity will be correlated with a successful reduction in OSA symptom severity as measured by a change in apnea-hypopnea index values. We also hypothesize that responders will have a decrease in oropharyngeal fat, which would indicate the mechanism of action of this novel therapy is a loss in oropharyngeal fat. Participants will be asked to: 1. have an MRI before undergoing the Cryosa Procedure 2. have an ultrasound before the Cryosa Procedure 3. permit the use of pressure-sensing catheters and ultrasound during their drug-induced sleep endoscopy, which is part of the ARCTIC-3 protocol 4. have an MRI after the Cryosa Procedure 5. have an ultrasound after the Cryosa Procedure.
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a sleep-related respiratory dysfunction. The prevalence of OSA is increasing with the increasing rates of obesity and elderly population worldwide. Perioperative anesthesia management should be adjusted to improve patient safety in patients with OSA. In OSA patients, positive pressure ventilation support may be required in the preoperative period, various ventilation strategies may be required in the intraoperative period, different pharmacologic agents may need to be avoided, and intensive care unit follow-up or noninvasive ventilation support may be required in the postoperative period. However, it is reported that a significant percentage of OSA patients remain undiagnosed. ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) has reported the criteria that should be questioned in order to determine the risk of patients in terms of OSA and to initiate the diagnostic process in risky patients and to make appropriate anesthesiologic arrangements in the perioperative period. In addition, the STOP-BANG assessment scale, which is widely used all over the world in OSA risk assessment, is also used in OSA risk assessment. It is thought that dental caries and extraction needs may be higher in OSA patients, especially since open-mouth sleeping accompanies the situation. In this respect, it is also important for patients to be diagnosed with OSA as it may prevent dental damage due to open-mouth sleeping in the future. Identifying patients at risk for OSA and directing them to the diagnostic process is very important for patient safety. Within the scope of the study, the criteria recommended by ASA and STOP-BANG score will be evaluated and recorded. Risk stratification in terms of STOP-BANG questionnaire and ASA criteria will be done separately for each patient and for each classification method. Patients at high risk will be consulted to the relevant medical department in the preoperative period for further investigation and treatment. In addition, it is aimed to correlate the risk levels determined in the study with postoperative respiratory complications and recovery time.
The prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing is high, with an apnea-hypopnea index of over 15 per hour found in 49.7% of men and 23.4% of women in the general population (1). The gold standard treatment for sleep-disordered breathing is continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy (2). However, nearly 30% of patients are considered non-adherent to CPAP treatment (3). Moreover, the number of hours of CPAP usage has been shown to be directly associated with a reduction in objective and subjective sleepiness, and improvement in daytime functioning (4). A recent prospective study conducted in a French clinical population cohort of 5138 participants found an effect of CPAP treatment duration on reducing the risk of developing a major cardiovascular event (stroke, myocardial infarction, all-cause mortality) (5). Therefore, the poor adherence to CPAP treatment represents a public health challenge for healthcare professionals managing these patients. Several predictors for non-adherence can be identified, such as using CPAP for less than 4 hours per night during the initial treatment phase, moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea, or low self-esteem (6). Measures aimed at promoting patient adaptation from the initiation of treatment are crucial as this period determines long-term adherence to CPAP therapy (7). Among these measures, there is the management of "physical" adverse effects such as xerostomia (using a humidifier), feeling too much or too little air (modifying CPAP pressure profiles), skin problems, and mask air leaks (interface adjustment), which are well-known and applied by health care organization providing the CPAP machines (2). On top of these "technical" problems, patients related issues such as mask-induced anxiety, psychosocial conditions, and dysfunctional thoughts about CPAP treatment may prevent patients from using their CPAP properly. Innovative tools such as psycho corporal therapies, including medical hypnosis, could be used in these situations. A recent literature review focusing on the impact of medical hypnosis on sleep disorders in adult patients found an improvement in various sleep parameters (sleep quality, insomnia complaints, frequency and/or intensity of parasomnias) in 58.4% of patients. However, in this systematic review of 24 studies, none of them explored the use of medical hypnosis in sleep-related breathing disorders (8). Hypnosis can be defined as an altered state of consciousness in which a person's attention is detached from their immediate environment and absorbed in inner experiences such as feelings, cognition, and imagery (9). Hypnotic induction involves focusing attention and imaginative involvement to the point where what is imagined seems real. By using and accepting suggestions, the clinician and the patient create a benevolent hypnotic reality with the goal of improving the patient's clinical situation (10). In the literature, there is only one clinical case report describing a benefit of medical hypnosis for CPAP tolerance in a child with cherubism (a rare fibro-osseous genetic disease-causing nasal obstruction). In this case, CPAP therapy using an oral interface was fully accepted after three hypnosis sessions and corrected the obstructive sleep breathing disorder (11). In a slightly different domain, there is a case report of successful use of medical hypnosis as an adjunct therapy for weaning from mechanical ventilation (12). Our hypothesis is that the use of medical hypnosis in CPAP-treated patients could improve the patient's perception of the treatment, making it more positive. Medical hypnosis could occur very early in the management process, with rapid learning of self-hypnosis to actively influence this crucial period for long term adherence of CPAP. The principal objective is therefore to evaluate the effects of medical hypnosis on adherence to CPAP therapy in patients with sleep-disordered breathing.
The primary purpose of this randomized controlled trial s to investigate whether surgical reduction of palatine tonsils (tonsillotomy) is a superior treatment compared to complete surgical removal of palatine tonsils (tonsillectomy) in adults patients with obstructive sleep apnea and concomitant enlarged tonsils in regards of perioperative and postoperative morbidity.
The study proposes to complete the development of and then establish the safety, efficacy, and clinical risk/benefit of a novel hospital incubator pad with stochastic vibrotactile stimulation (SVS) that will provide a complementary treatment and the first improvement in the clinical management of apnea of prematurity (AOP) in over 20 years. Currently, the only approved therapy for AOP is Caffeine Citrate. The SVS mattress pad can prove to be an effective, non-invasive adjunct to Caffeine Citrate for preterm infants with potential to shorten the need for respiratory support as well as overall shortened length of stay.
Obesity is a major risk factor for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), the most common sleep-disordered breathing related to neurocognitive and metabolic syndromes, type II diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases. Although strongly recommended for this condition, there are no studies on the effectiveness of an interdisciplinary weight loss and lifestyle intervention including nutrition, exercise, sleep hygiene, and smoking and alcohol cessation in women. INTERAPNEA-Women is a randomized controlled trial with a two-arm parallel design aimed at determining the effects of an interdisciplinary tailored weight loss and lifestyle intervention on OSA outcomes. The study will include 180 females aged 18-65 with a body mass index of ≥25 kg/m2 and severe to moderate OSA randomly assigned to usual care (i.e., continuous positive airway pressure), or interdisciplinary weight loss and lifestyle intervention combined with usual care. Outcomes will be measured at baseline, intervention end-point, and six-month post-intervention, including apnoea-hypopnoea index (primary outcome), other neurophysical and cardiorespiratory polysomnographic outcomes, sleep quality, daily functioning and mood, body weight and composition, physical fitness, blood biomarkers, and health-related quality of life. INTERAPNEA may serve to establish a cost-effective treatment not only for the improvement of OSA and its vast and severe comorbidities, but also for a potential remission of this condition.
Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) therapy (Inspire system) is intended for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who cannot be effectively treated with the first-line treatment options. Recently, the request for reimbursement of the Inspire system in Belgium was approved. The aim is to create a registry of OSA patients that are treated with HNS (Inspire system) within routine clinical care at the Antwerp University Hospital.