Safety and Effectiveness Study of Perceval S Valve for Extended CE Mark

Aortic Valve Replacement Clinical Trial

— CAVALIER  

Official title:

Perceval S Valve Clinical Trial for Extended CE Mark

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Terminated

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT01368666
• Other study ID #: TPS001
• Status: Terminated
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: February 23, 2010
• Est. completion date: January 31, 2020

Study information

• Verified date: March 2024
• Source: Corcym S.r.l
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The primary objective of this clinical investigation is to assess the safety and effectiveness of the Perceval S valve at 12 months after implantation when used to replace a diseased or dysfunctional aortic valve or aortic valve prosthesis.

Description:

Primary Endpoints The primary endpoint of the clinical investigation is the evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of the Perceval S valve at 12 months after implant. The safety of Perceval valve will be assessed in terms of percentage incidence of mortality and morbidity at 12 months after implant. The effectiveness of the Perceval s valve will be assessed in terms of: - Improvement of clinical status by mean of New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class at 12 months after implant - Haemodynamic performance through echocardiography parameters as mean gradient and peak gradient, effective orifice area (EOA), effective orifice area indexed (EOAI), performance index, cardiac output, cardiac index and degree of regurgitation at 12 months after implant In order to determine mortality and morbidity, the following specific device related and procedure related adverse event categories will be assessed: - valvular thrombosis, thromboembolism, hemorrhage (whether or not related to anti coagulant/ antiplatelet drug therapy) [all and major], paravalvular leak (all and major), endocarditis, hemolysis, structural valve deterioration, non structural dysfunction, reoperation (all and valve related), explant, death (all and valve related), device dislodgement and device migration In order to assess the Haemodynamic performance the following echocardiography parameters will be measured: - mean gradient and peak gradient, effective orifice area (EOA), effective orifice area indexed (EOAI), performance index, cardiac output, cardiac index and degree of regurgitation Secondary Endpoints The secondary endpoints of the clinical investigation are: - Assessment of mortality and morbidity rates at discharge (or 30 days if the patient is still hospitalized) and at 3-6 months after implant - Evaluation of the effectiveness of Perceval S valve in terms of improvement of clinical status assessed by means of NYHA functional class at discharge (or 30 days if the patient is still hospitalized), 3-6 months after surgery - Evaluation of the effectiveness of Perceval S valve in terms of haemodynamic performance through echocardiography at discharge (or 30 days if the patient is still hospitalized) and 3-6 months after surgery - Mortality and morbidity as well as haemodynamic parameters will be assessed The Protocol has been amended (CAVALIER TPS001 Rev 4.0 Nov 17, 2017) to continue the follow up of a selection of implanted patients annually up to 10 years to evaluate long term device performance in the top enroller investigational sites. The following secondary endpoints have been added: - Assessment of mortality and morbidity rates annually until 10 years follow up. In order to determine mortality and morbidity, the following specific device related and procedure related adverse event categories will be assessed: valvular thrombosis, thromboembolism, hemorrhage (whether or not related to anti coagulant/ antiplatelet drug therapy) [all and major], paravalvular leak, endocarditis, hemolysis, structural valve deterioration, non structural dysfunction, reoperation, explant, death (all and valve related), device dislodgement and device migration. - Evaluation of the effectiveness of Perceval valve in terms of improvement of clinical status assessed by NYHA change from baseline versus each follow-up up to 10 years. - Evaluation of the effectiveness of Perceval valve in terms of haemodynamic performance through echocardiography at each follow up until 10 years. In order to assess the haemodynamic performance the following echocardiography parameters will be measured: mean gradient and peak gradient, effective orifice area (EOA), effective orifice area indexed (EOAI), performance index, cardiac output, cardiac index and degree of regurgitation.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Terminated
• Enrollment: 658
• Est. completion date: January 31, 2020
• Est. primary completion date: October 31, 2014
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 65 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Subjects of age > 65 years;

2. Subjects with aortic valve stenosis or steno-insufficiency;

3. Subjects in which preoperative evaluation indicated the need for native or prosthetic aortic valve replacement with a biological prosthesis;

4. Subjects willing to sign the informed consent;

5. Subjects willing to undergo all medical follow-up, echocardiography examinations and laboratory tests planned for the Study

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Subjects involved in any other clinical study for drugs or devices;

2. Subjects with a previously implanted Perceval S prosthesis, within the clinical study, that requires replacement

3. Subjects with previous implantation of valve prostheses or annuloplasty ring not being replaced by the study valve

4. Subjects requiring simultaneous cardiac procedures, apart from septal myectomy and/or coronary by-pass

5. Subjects who require double or multiple valve replacement or repair in whom the mitral, tricuspid, or pulmonic valve would be replaced with a non-Perceval S valve or repaired

6. Subjects with aneurysmal dilation or dissection of the ascending aortic wall

7. Subjects needing non elective intervention

8. Subjects with active endocarditis

9. Subjects with active myocarditis

10. Subjects with congenital bicuspid aortic valve

11. Subjects with aortic root enlargement, where the ratio between the diameter of the sino-tubular junction and the annulus diameter, assessed by TTE, is > 1.3 (see Attachment 1 for reference)

12. Subjects with aortic root height (measured from aortic annulus to sino-tubular junction) = 21 mm for size 21, = 22.5 mm for size 23 and = 24 mm for size 25, and = 25 mm for size XL/27

13. Subjects with myocardial infarction < 90 days before the planned valve implant surgery

14. Subjects with known hypersensitivity to nickel alloys

15. The subject has a documented history of substance (drug or alcohol) abuse

16. The subject is a prison inmate, institutionalized, or is unable to give informed consent;

17. The subject has a major or progressive non-cardiac disease that, in the investigator's experience, results in a life expectancy shorter than 1 year, or the implant of the device produces an unacceptable increased risk to the patient

18. The subject is undergoing renal dialysis for chronic renal failure or has hyperparathyroidism

19. The subject has had an acute preoperative neurological deficit, myocardial infarction, or cardiac event that has not returned to baseline or stabilized = 30 days prior to the planned valve implant surgery

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Aortic Valve Replacement

Intervention

Device:
• Perceval S Valve Prosthesis
Replacement of diseased or malfunctioning native aortic valve with the Perceval S valve prosthesis

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Austria	Universitäts-Klinik für Chirurgie	Graz
Austria	Universitätsklinik für Chirurgie	Wien
Belgium	Onze-Lieve-Vrouw (OLV) Ziekenhuis	Aalst
Belgium	UZ Leuven	Leuven
France	CHRU de Lille	Lille
France	CHU - Nantes	Nantes
France	Institut Mutualiste Montsouris	Paris
France	Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque	Pessac
Germany	Herz- und Gefässzentrum Bad Bevensen	Bad Bevensen
Germany	RHÖN Klinikum AG, Herz- und Gefäß-Klinik GmbH	Bad Neustadt An Der Saale
Germany	Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW	Bad Oeynhausen
Germany	Ruhr Universität Bochum	Bochum
Germany	Städtisches Klinikum Braunschweig	Braunschweig
Germany	Westdeutsches Herzzentrum	Essen
Germany	Universitäres Herzzentrum Hamburg GmbH	Hamburg
Germany	Medizinische Hochschule Hannover	Hannover
Germany	Herzzentrum Leipzig	Leipzig
Germany	Deutsches Herzzentrum	Munich
Germany	Klinikum Nürnberg Süd	Nürnberg
Germany	Klinikum Oldenburg GmbH	Oldenburg
Netherlands	Academic Medical Center, Division of Cardio-thoracic Surgery	Amsterdam
Netherlands	Catharina Ziekenhuis	Eindhoven
Netherlands	St. Antonius Ziekenhuis	Nieuwegein
Poland	Silesian Center for Heart Diseases	Zabrze
Switzerland	Inselspital, Universitätsklinik für Herz- und Gefässchirurgie	Bern
United Kingdom	Genfield General Hospital	Leicester

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Corcym S.r.l

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

Austria,  Belgium,  France,  Germany,  Netherlands,  Poland,  Switzerland,  United Kingdom, 

References & Publications (1)

Fischlein T, Meuris B, Folliguet T, Hakim-Meibodi K, Misfeld M, Carrel T, Zembala M, Cerutti E, Asch FM, Haverich A; CAVALIER Trial Investigators. Midterm outcomes with a sutureless aortic bioprosthesis in a prospective multicenter cohort study. J Thorac — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Evaluation of the safety: incidence of mortality	Incidence of mortality	12 months after OP
Primary	Evaluation of the safety: Incidence of morbidity	Incidence of morbidity; Mortality and morbidity, adverse event categories: valvular thrombosis, thromboembolism, hemorrhage, paravalvular leak, endocarditis, hemolysis, SVD, non structural dysfunction, reoperation, explant, death, device dislodgement and device migration	12 months after OP
Primary	Evaluation of NYHA functional class	Change of NYHA functional class	12 months after OP
Primary	Evaluation of haemodynamic performance: mean and peak gradients	Change of aortic mean gradient and peak gradient (mmHg)	12 months after OP
Primary	Evaluation of haemodynamic performance: Effective Orifice Area (EOA) and Effective Orifice Area indexed (EOAI)	Change of EOA (cm2) and EOAI (cm2/m2) PI, cardiac output, cardiac index and degree of regurgitation	12 months after OP
Primary	Evaluation of haemodynamic performance: Cardiac Index	Change of Cardiac Index (l/min/m2)	12 months after OP
Primary	Evaluation of haemodynamic performance: Cardiac Output	Change of Cardiac Output (l/min)	12 months after OP
Primary	Evaluation of haemodynamic performance: incidence and degree of regurgitation	Change of incidence (%) and degree of regurgitation (none, trace, mild, moderate, severe)	12 months after OP
Secondary	Evaluation of the safety: incidence of mortality	Incidence of mortality	3-6 months
Secondary	Evaluation of the safety: Incidence of morbidity	Incidence of morbidity	3-6 months
Secondary	Evaluation of NYHA functional class	Change of NYHA functional class	3-6 months
Secondary	Evaluation of haemodynamic performance	haemodynamic performance: mean gradient and peak gradient, EOA, EOAI, cardiac output, cardiac index and degree of regurgitation	3-6 months
Secondary	Evaluation of the safety: Incidence of mortality	Incidence of mortality	up to 10 years
Secondary	Evaluation of the safety: Incidence of morbidity	Incidence of morbidity	up to 10 years
Secondary	Evaluation of NYHA functional class	Change of NYHA functional class	up to 10 years
Secondary	Evaluation of haemodynamic performance	haemodynamic performance: mean gradient and peak gradient, EOA, EOAI, cardiac output, cardiac index and degree of regurgitation	up to 10 years