Early Surgery Versus Conventional Treatment in Very Severe Aortic Stenosis

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

The optimal timing of surgical intervention remains controversial in asymptomatic patients with very severe aortic stenosis. The investigators therefore try to compare long-term clinical outcomes of early surgery with those of conventional treatment strategy in a prospective randomized trial.

Clinical Trial Description

Management of asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) remains controversial, and the combined risks of aortic valve surgery and late complications of aortic valve prosthesis need to be balanced against the possibility of preventing sudden death and lowering cardiac mortality. Considering that sudden cardiac death occurs at a rate of approximately 1% per year and that the average postoperative mortality of isolated AV replacement is 3.0-4.0%, the 2007 European Society of Cardiology guidelines do not recommend aortic valve surgery for asymptomatic patients with severe AS and the 2006 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines recommend surgery as a class IIb indication only in patients with extremely severe AS and who are at low operative risk. Clinical outcomes vary widely according to the severity of stenosis in asymptomatic AS, and asymptomatic patients with very severe AS are often referred for aortic valve replacement in clinical practice despite the lack of data supporting early surgery. Rosenhek et al recently reported a worse prognosis with a higher event rate and a risk of rapid deterioration in very severe AS, and the investigators also recently reported that compared with the conventional treatment strategy, early surgery in patients with very severe AS is associated with an improved long-term survival in a prospective, observational study. However, there have been no prospective,randomized studies comparing early surgery with a watchful waiting strategy in very severe AS. We sought to compare long-term clinical outcomes of early surgery with those of conventional management based on current guidelines. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT01161732
Study type	Interventional
Source	Asan Medical Center
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase	N/A
Start date	July 2010
Completion date	April 30, 2019

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Recruiting	`NCT04310046` - Optimal Timing of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - The TAVI PCI Trial	N/A
Completed	`NCT03332745` - Mechanism of Decompensation Evaluation - Aortic Stenosis
Recruiting	`NCT06008080` - Post-Market Clinical Follow Up Study With Navitor Valve
Recruiting	`NCT06055751` - Long Term Evaluation of Cardiac Arrhythmias After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation -The LOCATE Registry
Active, not recruiting	`NCT04815785` - Safety and Efficacy of TaurusOne® Transcatheter Aortic Valve System in Patients With Severe Calcific Aortic Stenosis	N/A
Terminated	`NCT02202434` - Safety and Efficacy Study of Lotus Valve for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT03029026` - The Role of Occult Cardiac Amyloid in the Elderly With Aortic Stenosis.
Active, not recruiting	`NCT02903420` - A Clinical Trial of Transcatheter Aortic Valves in Dialysis Patients (Japan)	N/A
Completed	`NCT02629328` - CardioCel Tri-leaflet Repair Study	N/A
Completed	`NCT02306226` - Symetis ACURATE Neo™ Valve Implantation SAVI TF Registry
Withdrawn	`NCT01648309` - Neuropsychological Testing in Patients Undergoing Transvascular Aortic Valve Implantation	N/A
Completed	`NCT01676727` - ADVANCE Direct Aortic Study
Completed	`NCT01422044` - Risk Prediction in Aortic Stenosis	N/A
Withdrawn	`NCT00774657` - Ventricular Remodeling In Patients With Aortic Stenosis Assessed Echocardiography	N/A
Terminated	`NCT00535899` - Speckle Tracking Imaging in Patients With Low Ejection Fraction Aortic Stenosis (SPArKLE-AS)	N/A
Terminated	`NCT05070130` - OpSens PRIME CLASS
Completed	`NCT03314857` - China XT: Safety and Effectiveness of Edwards Lifesciences SAPIEN XT THV in the Chinese Population	N/A
Completed	`NCT04157920` - Impact of Predilatation Between Self-expanding Valves	N/A
Enrolling by invitation	`NCT06212050` - Feasibility, Safety, and Effectiveness of the ACURATE neo2 Transcatheter Heart Valve for Severe Bicuspid Aortic Stenosis
Recruiting	`NCT05893082` - Multicenter Feasibility Trial of the F2 Filter and Delivery System for Embolic Protection During TAVR	N/A

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

Early Surgery Versus Conventional Treatment in Very Severe Aortic Stenosis — RECOVERY

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms