Outcome
Type |
Measure |
Description |
Time frame |
Safety issue |
Primary |
Change in self- attribution (externalizing bias score) from Pre-assessment to Post-assessment 1 |
Internal Personal Situational Attributions Questionnaire (IPSAQ) measures externalizing bias (EB) that is calculated by subtracting the number of internal attributions for negative events from the number of internal attributions for positive events. A positive EB score indicates strong self-serving bias (blaming oneself less for negative events than for positive events). |
Baseline, 4 weeks after intervention |
|
Primary |
Change in state self-esteem score from Pre-assessment to Post-assessment 1 |
State Self-Esteem Scale measures a participant's self-esteem at a given point in time. Possible scores range from 0-5 with higher scores indicating better outcome. |
Baseline, 4 weeks after intervention |
|
Primary |
Change in trait self-esteem score from Pre-assessment to Post-assessment 1 |
Rosenberg trait self-esteem scale measures trait self-esteem (TSE). Possible scores range from 0-4 (from 1: strongly disagree, to 4: strongly agree), with higher scores indicating higher TSE. |
Baseline, 4 weeks after intervention |
|
Primary |
Study components feedback score |
The Attribution Bias Intervention Questionnaire addressed study component feedback using both a rating scales and free form written commentary. Possible scores range from 1 to 10 with higher scores indicating more positive values. |
4 weeks after starting intervention |
|
Primary |
Patient satisfaction score |
The Attribution Bias Feedback Form measured patient satisfaction (the impact and value of study) with free-form verbal responses as well as a single rating scale. Possible scores range from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating more satisfaction with the intervention. |
5-9 weeks after intervention |
|
Primary |
Change in eating disorder symptoms score from Pre- assessment to Post-assessment 1 |
The Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire measures the severity of eating disorder symptoms. Possible scores on global eating disorder pathology range from 0 to 6 with higher scores indicating more severity of eating disorder, with scores of 2 or less typical of normative eating behavior/cognitions and scores of 2 to 6 are consistent with eating disorder symptoms, with higher scores suggesting more types of disordered eating are present. |
Baseline, 4 weeks after intervention |
|
Secondary |
Change in depression symptoms scores from Pre-assessment to Post-assessment 1 |
QIDS (Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms) measures depression symptoms. Possible scores range from 0-27, with scores of 5 or lower indicative of no depression, scores from 6 to 10 indicating mild depression, 11 to 15 indicating moderate depression, 16 to 20 reflecting severe depression, and total scores greater than 21 indicating very severe depression. |
Baseline, 4 weeks after intervention |
|
Secondary |
Change in depression symptoms scores from Pre-assessment to Post-assessment 2 |
QIDS (Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms) measures depression symptoms. Possible scores range from 0-27, with scores of 5 or lower indicative of no depression, scores from 6 to 10 indicating mild depression, 11 to 15 indicating moderate depression, 16 to 20 reflecting severe depression, and total scores greater than 21 indicating very severe depression. |
Baseline, 3-5 months after intervention |
|
Secondary |
Change in anxiety symptoms score from Pre-assessment to Post-assessment 1 |
SIGH-A (Structured Clinical Interview for Hamilton Anxiety Scale) measures Anxiety symptoms. Possible scores range from 0-56 with score of 0 means no anxiety symptom. ( <17 indicates mild severity, 18-24 mild to moderate severity and 25-30 moderate to severe. Lower scores indicate better outcome) |
Baseline, 4 weeks after intervention |
|
Secondary |
Change in anxiety symptoms score from Pre-assessment to Post-assessment 2 |
SIGH-A (Structured Clinical Interview for Hamilton Anxiety Scale) measures anxiety symptoms. Possible scores range from 0-56 with score of 0 means no anxiety symptom ; <17 indicates mild severity, 18-24 mild to moderate severity and 25-30 moderate to severe. Lower scores indicate better outcome. |
Baseline, 3-5 months after intervention |
|
Secondary |
Change in eating disorder symptoms score from Pre-assessment to Post-assessment 2 |
The Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire measures the severity of eating disorder symptoms. Possible scores on global eating disorder pathology range from 0 to 6 with higher scores indicating more severity of eating disorder, with scores of 2 or less typical of normative eating behavior/cognitions and scores of 2 to 6 are consistent with eating disorder symptoms, with higher scores suggesting more types of disordered eating are present. |
Baseline, 3-5 months after intervention |
|
Secondary |
Change in self- attribution (externalizing bias score) from Pre-assessment to Post-assessment 2 |
Internal Personal Situational Attributions Questionnaire (IPSAQ) measures externalizing bias (EB) that is calculated by subtracting the number of internal attributions for negative events from the number of internal attributions for positive events. A positive EB score therefore indicates strong self-serving bias (blaming oneself less for negative events than for positive events). |
Baseline, 3-5 months after intervention |
|
Secondary |
Change in state self-esteem score from Pre-assessment to Post-assessment 2 |
State self-esteem scale measures a participant's self-esteem at a given point in time. Possible scores range from 0-5 with higher scores indicating better outcome. |
Baseline, 3-5 months after intervention |
|
Secondary |
Change in trait self-esteem score from Pre-assessment to Post-assessment 2 |
Rosenberg trait self-esteem scale measures Trait Self-Esteem (TSE). Possible scores range from 0-4 (from 1: strongly disagree, to 4: strongly agree), with higher scores indicating higher TSE. |
Baseline, 3-5 months after intervention |
|