View clinical trials related to Anodontia.
Filter by:This study aims to assess the treatment outcomes (clinical, functional and subjective) of full arch rehabilitations supported by implants with or without an immediate loading protocol. In this randomized clinical trial 20 fully edentulous patients were treated with full arch rehabilitations on dental implants. In half of the sample, the implants were loaded immediately by means of abutments after emplacement of the implant; but in the counterparts these abutments were connected to implants two months after the surgery (conventional protocol), and until that time the dentures were retained by healing abutments. Treatment outcomes were assessed at 2, 6 and 12 months after surgery. Clinical outcomes were quantified on the basis of implant failure rate, marginal bone loss and the peri-implant gingival index. Functional outcomes were calculated according to masticatory performance, estimated by the mixed fraction of a two-coloured chewing gum after 5, 10 and 15 chewing strokes, by the occlusal force recorded by pressure-sensitive sheets and by the bioelectrical muscular activity. The subjective outcomes of the treatment were assessed using both the oral satisfaction scale (visual analogue scale) and the Spanish version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-20).
Objective: The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of implant-supported prostheses (ISP) among patients who had excised pathological jaw lesions. Material and Methods: Patients who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria in a dental teaching hospital were recruited. Data pertaining to sociodemographic factors, conditions requiring surgery, surgical procedures and related complications, and types of ISP were collected. Patients' expectation and satisfaction to the ISP including oral health, self-perceived appearance, speech, chewing ability, oral comfort and ease of cleaning were assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS, 0-100) and global transitional scale/judgement (Likert scale). Data were analysed using t-test and chi-square tests at the significance level α=0.05.
Approximately 40 implants from patients seeking treatment at the University of Oklahoma, College of Dentistry will be recruited for this study. Osteotomies will be prepared using the osseodensification technique and implants will be placed immediately after. The implants will be from a single manufacturer (Roxolid® SLA® Bone Level Tapered; Straumann®, Institut Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland). Volumetric analysis of alveolar ridge will be studied using intra-surgical direct measurements and CBCT imaging. A custom stent will be fabricated to standardize the clinical and radiographic measurements at 2mm, 3mm, and 4mm apical to the alveolar crest. Changes in peri-implant bone density will be analyzed on standardized periapical and bitewing radiographs, using the ImageJ software (National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA). Implant stability quotient (ISQ) values will be recorded with a resonance frequency analysis system (Osstell®, Gothenburg, Sweden). Calibrated examiners will assess implant survival and biological or restorative complications and failures. Sites will be evaluated throughout osseointegration and one year after final restoration is delivered.
Several recent systematic reviews have highlighted how the macrodesign of dental implants can influence stress distribution and biomechanical and biological behavior in implants immediately inserted in post-extraction sites. Finite element analyzes have confirmed the benefit of the inclination of the implant threads in reducing implant displacement in post-extraction sites, increasing primary stability, and decreasing stress in contact with the trabecular bone. Other comparative studies have shown that the design of the threads of the implant does not affect the distribution of stress in the surrounding bone. In view of the need to evaluate the influence of implant macrodesign in the case of implants inserted in post-extraction alveoli, this study will examine the clinical results of two different types of implants with different macrodesigns, with the aim of providing scientific evidence in this regard. The present study will investigate through a randomized controlled trial the effect of thread macrodesign of X-space implants on primary stability and osseointegration when inserted in post-extraction sites, as compared to cylindric 2P implants.
Comparison of different drilling speed to classify bone quality by tactile sensation on a saw bone model
Retrospective, observational cohort study. Objectives : To search for correlations between socio-economical deprivation and oral health in french children of 9 years of age. To study the annual use of oral and dental care of children from 6 to 9 years of age depending on their geographical and socio-economical environment, and the medical demography ; To identify and study the share of the cohort not using oral and dental care, and the socio-economical and geographical factors implicated in this non-use of care. The study will use data from the french nationwide healthcare systems database (SNDS) and data from the french national institute of statistics and economic studies (INSEE).
Patients who have severe crowding that require four premolars extraction will be treated in this study. The efficacy of the clear aligners and vestibular fixed appliances will be assessed. The treatment result of these two different methods will be explored using the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) in two different times (T0: Before treatment, T1: After treatment) and the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System (ABO-OGS) after treatment (T1). There are two groups: First group (Experimental): the patients in this group will be treated using clear aligners. Second group (Control): the patients in this group will be treated using fixed appliances.
Total of 48 subjects were randomly assigned to treatment groups: UT Health Science Center at San Antonio Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan Patients require a maxillary non-molar extraction site that is planned to be replaced by a dental implant and crown. This includes Straumann BL SLActive: Narrow (3.3mm) & Regular (4.1mm) Crossfit implants in all available lengths. Patients were randomly selected to receive either FDBA (test) or Autogenous bone + DBBM (control/standard) for contour augmentation.
To evaluate the change in patient Oral Health-related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) from wearing a cobalt chrome (CoCr) removable partial denture (RPD) to wearing the Solvay Dental 360TM polymer Removable Partial Denture (RPD) for 8 weeks.
The purpose of this investigator-initiated study is to compare new bone formation through histomorphometric analysis following maxillary sinus augmentation using two different bone graft materials. A total of twenty, sinus augmentation via a lateral approach will be performed for subjects requiring sinus augmentation for implant placement and randomly divided into 2 groups. These subjects will receive one of two different bone graft materials: 1) Anorganic bovine bone matrix- InterOss (Group A), 2) Anorganic bovine bone matrix- Bio-oss (Group B). At the time of implant placement (eight months after the sinus augmentation procedure), two bone biopsies will be collected from augmented site for the histomorphometric analysis. The percentage of vital bone will be measured and analyzed statistically, also the following will be measured: percentage of non-vital bone, percentage of non-bone material , and the percentage of connective tissue.