View clinical trials related to Angina, Unstable.
Filter by:Oxygen treatment is widely used in acutely ill patients, both pre-hospital and in hospital. The indication for oxygen is sometimes unquestionable, such as in many hypoxic patients, but in other situations its use is more of a practise and much less based on scientific evidence. In particular, oxygen treatment is routinely used in patients with a suspected heart attack and variably recommended in guidelines, despite very limited data supporting a beneficial effect. Indeed, a few studies even indicate that oxygen treatment might be harmful. Immediate re-opening of the acutely blocked artery to the heart muscle is the treatment of choice to limit permanent injury. However, the sudden re-initiation of blood flow achieved with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the reopening and stenting of the blocked vessel, can give rise to further endothelial and myocardial damage, so-called reperfusion injury. Ischemia and reperfusion associated myocardial injury (IR-injury) involves a wide range of pathological processes. Vascular leakage, activation of cell death programs, thrombocytes and white blood cells leading to extended inflammation and formation of clots are examples of those effects. The role of oxygen treatment on these pathological processes, on the extent of IR-injury and the final infarct size in patients with acute myocardial infarctions (AMI) has not previously been studied. In an ongoing national multicentre, randomized, registry based clinical trial, the DETO2X-AMI trial (NCT01787110), the effect of oxygen on morbidity and mortality in ACS patients is being investigated. The present DETO2X-biomarkers study is a substudy of the DETO2X-AMI trial, evaluating the effect of oxygen treatment on biological systems involved in the pathogenesis of reversible and irreversible myocardial damage and cell death in ACS.
Despite the well-known health benefits of physical exercise in the prevention of chronic diseases, less attention has been focused on the use of physical exercise as an essential part of good treatment for chronic disease. The aims of the study are to investigate the feasibility, medical effects, cost-effectiveness, and social perspectives of the individualized exercise-based rehabilitation [2 different high-intensity training (HIT) protocols combined with usual care (UC)] after acute coronary artery disease (CAD) event. The medical aim is to study mediating mechanisms of the physiological, biochemical and molecular effects of exercise training on the clinical outcomes. The aim of the health-economic evaluation is to assess the changes in the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) and health care related costs for estimating the cost-effectiveness of HIT-based exercise rehabilitation. The purpose of the sociological analysis is to find out the social processes which make possible the emergence of the desired welfare effects.
Specific cardiovascular diseases, such as stroke and heart attack, have been shown to vary by ethnic group. However, less is known about differences between ethnic groups and a wider range of cardiovascular diseases. This study will examine differences between ethnic groups (White, Black, South Asian and Mixed/Other) and first lifetime presentation of twelve different cardiovascular diseases. This information may help to predict the onset of cardiovascular diseases and inform disease prevention strategies. The hypothesis is that different ethnic groups have differing associations with the range of cardiovascular diseases studied.
Rationale: The introduction of drug-eluting stents (DES) in the treatment of coronary artery disease has led to a significant reduction in morbidity but there are further demands on DES performance. Such demands are an optimized performance in very challenging coronary lesions; third generation DES were developed in an effort to further improve DES performance in such challenging lesions. Two CE-certified third generation DES (Resolute Integrity and Promus Element stents) are currently available; there are no data that indicate an advantage of one of these DES over the other. Objective: To investigate whether the clinical outcome is similar after implantation of the Promus Element versus the Resolute Integrity stent (non-inferiority hypothesis). Study design: Multicenter, prospective, randomized single-blinded study. Study population: Patients who require percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) for the treatment of coronary stenoses with an indication for DES use, according to current guidelines and/or the operators clinical judgement. All clinical syndromes will be included. Intervention: In patients who are eligible for DES implantation, the type of DES implanted will be randomized (Resolute Integrity stent versus Promus Element stent). At the start of the study, both DES will also be used in routine clinical practice. Main study endpoints: The primary endpoint is the incidence of target vessel failure at one year follow-up. Target vessel failure (TVF) is a composite endpoint consisting of cardiac death, target vessel MI, or clinically driven target vessel revascularization. Further secondary clinical and angiographic endpoints will be investigated, defined in accordance with suggestions of the Academic Research Consortium (ARC). Of note, the angiographic assessment is based on clinically indicated projections only and results in no additional x-ray exposure. There is no routine angiographic follow-up. If angiographic data are available in patients who undergo symptom-driven re-catheterization, we will analyze these data to get insight into the mechanisms of potential DES restenosis. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Patients will receive the routine clinical treatment. As a consequence, the risks of this trial do not exceed the risks of any routine PCI procedure.
BASIC VALIDATE is a coronary stent registry to obtain clinical follow-up information from 2000 patients treated with CE-marked stent (BioMatrix Flex™, Biosensors International) with follow-up of endpoints via the Swedish angiography and angioplasty registry (SCAAR - part of the national SWEDEHEART registry).
To evaluate the safety, performance and efficacy of the bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) system in patients with coronary artery disease
The purpose of this study is to assess the usability and safety of the Opsens OptoWire and Optomonitor in measuring fractional flow reserve (FFR) in patients with coronary artery disease who are undergoing a coronary angiogram.
The purpose of this study is to collect additional safety and effectiveness data for on the Biosensors BioFreedom™ BA9 Drug Coated Coronary Stent in patients with native, de novo coronary artery disease.
A multicenter, randomized clinical trial in elderly patients (over 80 years old) with unstable angina pectoris or Non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). A total of 200 patients will be randomized to medical treatment (100 patients) or coronary angiography with revascularization if feasible (100 patients). Information regarding prior history, frailty, clinical presentation, in-hospital events, complications, angina, quality of life and mortality will be collected. Follow up time is 1 year.
The objective of this study is to evaluate CMX-2043 for prevention of renal and cardiac injury associated with coronary angiography in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), but excluding ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. This study will specifically examine the ability of CMX-2043 to prevent acute renal injury following coronary angiography. The study will also examine the ability of CMX 2043 for prevention of periprocedural cardiac injury. Information will be obtained relating to the ability of CMX 2043 for prevention of major adverse cardiac and renal events following the procedure. Additional information will be obtained in this study to evaluate safety of the drug. Dose and regimen information will also be obtained for future clinical studies of CMX-2043.