Clinical Trials Logo

Angina Pectoris clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Angina Pectoris.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT02176174 Completed - Stroke Clinical Trials

Ethnicity and Onset of Cardiovascular Disease: A CALIBER Study

Start date: December 2013
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

Specific cardiovascular diseases, such as stroke and heart attack, have been shown to vary by ethnic group. However, less is known about differences between ethnic groups and a wider range of cardiovascular diseases. This study will examine differences between ethnic groups (White, Black, South Asian and Mixed/Other) and first lifetime presentation of twelve different cardiovascular diseases. This information may help to predict the onset of cardiovascular diseases and inform disease prevention strategies. The hypothesis is that different ethnic groups have differing associations with the range of cardiovascular diseases studied.

NCT ID: NCT02175706 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Coronary Artery Disease

DUrable Polymer-based STent CHallenge of Promus ElemEnt Versus ReSolute Integrity

DUTCHPEERS
Start date: November 2010
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Rationale: The introduction of drug-eluting stents (DES) in the treatment of coronary artery disease has led to a significant reduction in morbidity but there are further demands on DES performance. Such demands are an optimized performance in very challenging coronary lesions; third generation DES were developed in an effort to further improve DES performance in such challenging lesions. Two CE-certified third generation DES (Resolute Integrity and Promus Element stents) are currently available; there are no data that indicate an advantage of one of these DES over the other. Objective: To investigate whether the clinical outcome is similar after implantation of the Promus Element versus the Resolute Integrity stent (non-inferiority hypothesis). Study design: Multicenter, prospective, randomized single-blinded study. Study population: Patients who require percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) for the treatment of coronary stenoses with an indication for DES use, according to current guidelines and/or the operators clinical judgement. All clinical syndromes will be included. Intervention: In patients who are eligible for DES implantation, the type of DES implanted will be randomized (Resolute Integrity stent versus Promus Element stent). At the start of the study, both DES will also be used in routine clinical practice. Main study endpoints: The primary endpoint is the incidence of target vessel failure at one year follow-up. Target vessel failure (TVF) is a composite endpoint consisting of cardiac death, target vessel MI, or clinically driven target vessel revascularization. Further secondary clinical and angiographic endpoints will be investigated, defined in accordance with suggestions of the Academic Research Consortium (ARC). Of note, the angiographic assessment is based on clinically indicated projections only and results in no additional x-ray exposure. There is no routine angiographic follow-up. If angiographic data are available in patients who undergo symptom-driven re-catheterization, we will analyze these data to get insight into the mechanisms of potential DES restenosis. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Patients will receive the routine clinical treatment. As a consequence, the risks of this trial do not exceed the risks of any routine PCI procedure.

NCT ID: NCT02166736 Completed - Clinical trials for Acute Myocardial Infarction

Evaluation of iFR vs FFR in Stable Angina or Acute Coronary Syndrome

iFR Swedeheart
Start date: May 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Previous trials have demonstrated that the use of physiological assessment of stenosis severity using fractional flow reserve (FFR) is superior to angiographic assessment in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and improves clinical outcome. Despite the clinical utility, FFR is used only in 10-15% of patients today. The main reasons for the low adoption rate of FFR are the prolonged procedural time, Adenosine related discomfort and cost associated with Adenosine. Instantaneous Wave-Free ratio (iFR®) is a novel method to assess coronary lesions for functional significance. The main benefits of the method compared to FFR are that the measurement is instantaneous and does not require Adenosine infusion. Thus, the patient does not experience any discomfort from the measurement and procedural time could be shortened compared to when using FFR. This could potentially increase the adoption rate of physiologic assessment of coronary lesions. The aim of this trial is to compare the clinical outcome of patients assessed by iFR® with patients assessed by FFR. Furthermore, the trial will be conducted as a registry based randomized clinical trial (RRCT) which is a novel strategy to conduct clinical trials. The randomization will occur online in the Swedish angiography and angioplasty registry (SWEDEHEART) using a web based platform.

NCT ID: NCT02165670 Withdrawn - Clinical trials for Stable Angina Pectoris

BASIC VALIDATE Coronary Stent Registry

Start date: June 2014
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

BASIC VALIDATE is a coronary stent registry to obtain clinical follow-up information from 2000 patients treated with CE-marked stent (BioMatrix Flex™, Biosensors International) with follow-up of endpoints via the Swedish angiography and angioplasty registry (SCAAR - part of the national SWEDEHEART registry).

NCT ID: NCT02162056 Completed - Clinical trials for Coronary Artery Disease

Coronary and Structural Interventions Ulm - Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold

CSI-Ulm-BVS
Start date: November 2013
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

To evaluate the safety, performance and efficacy of the bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) system in patients with coronary artery disease

NCT ID: NCT02158754 Withdrawn - Clinical trials for Coronary Artery Disease

Clinician Utilization of Corus CAD (or ASGES) in Primary Care Provider Decision Making

CU-PCP
Start date: May 2014
Phase:
Study type: Observational

This retrospective study will investigate clinician behavior in diagnosing patients with possible obstructive coronary artery disease who received a Corus CAD (Age/Sex/Gene Expression score - ASGES) result compared to patients who did not have the test performed (matched control patients).

NCT ID: NCT02158455 Active, not recruiting - Angina Pectoris Clinical Trials

Vein vs Arterial Grafts for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery

Start date: February 2004
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The investigators have developed a novel technique for saphenous vein graft harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) where the graft is harvested with a pedicle of surrounding tissue. A randomized trial has shown a significantly higher patency rate for vein grafts harvested with this new methode compared to conventional harvesting technique 8.5 years after surgery (90 vs 76 %). In 2004 the investigators started a prospective randomized trial comparing patency between vein grafts harvested with surrounding tissue and radial artery grafts. The result showed that vein grafts harvested with surrounding tissue had a significantly higher patency rate compared to radial artery grafts 3 years after surgery (98 vs 84 %). The present study is a long-term follow-up (8 years) of the patients included in the second randomized trial. The hypothesis is that vein grafts harvested with surrounding tissue have a significantly higher patency rate compared to radial artery grafts 8 years after surgery.

NCT ID: NCT02144090 Completed - Chest Pain Clinical Trials

Opsens Optowire for Fractional Flow Reserve - The O2 Pilot Study

O2
Start date: May 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to assess the usability and safety of the Opsens OptoWire and Optomonitor in measuring fractional flow reserve (FFR) in patients with coronary artery disease who are undergoing a coronary angiogram.

NCT ID: NCT02128022 Completed - Angina Pectoris Clinical Trials

Cardioprotective Effects of GLP-1 and Their Mechanisms

Start date: July 2014
Phase: Phase 1
Study type: Interventional

Ischaemic heart disease is the most common cause of death in the UK. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) has been demonstrated to protect the heart when it is deprived of blood supply (ischaemia). The mechanism for this protection is not clear. Similar protection occurs with ischaemic conditioning of the heart, which is dependent on potassium channel opening. The investigators intend to establish whether GLP-1 mediated protection shares a similar mechanistic pathway. In order to do this the investigators will measures pressure--volume loops generated in the main pumping chamber of the heart at the time of a percutaneous coronary intervention (stenting). Patients will be allocated to GLP-1 alone, GLP-1 with glibenclamide (a potassium channel blocking medication approved for human use), saline control or glibenclamide alone. The investigators hypothesis is that the effect of GLP-1 will be abrogated by use of glibenclamide.

NCT ID: NCT02127996 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Myocardial Infarction

GLP-1 Loading During Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

GOLD-PCI
Start date: March 2015
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

Angina is caused by narrowings or blockages within coronary arteries. Coronary angioplasty and stenting is performed for people with angina to improve the blood supply to the heart by placing metal tubes within the artery using balloon inflation. The procedure risks small but significant damage to the heart muscle downstream of the balloon. Glucagon like peptide 1 (GLP 1) is a naturally occurring hormone secreted by cells in the gut in response to food. It acts by stimulating the release of insulin. In the heart it acts to increase glucose uptake into cardiac muscle. GLP−1 can protect the heart and improve heart muscle performance in people with coronary artery disease in physiological studies. This study which assesses whether GLP−1 protects the heart during coronary angioplasty and stenting. The hypothesis is that GLP-1 given during elective coronary angioplasty and stenting will reduce cardiac troponin rise (a measure of heart muscle damage) compared to placebo.