Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05189431 |
Other study ID # |
H-19016524 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
July 1, 2018 |
Est. completion date |
November 30, 2019 |
Study information
Verified date |
December 2021 |
Source |
Hvidovre University Hospital |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Observational [Patient Registry]
|
Clinical Trial Summary
We wish to study the feasibilty of using the peripheral perfusion index as a supplementary
monitor during induction of general anesthesia
Description:
Haemodynamic monitoring during general anaesthesia (GA) traditionally relies on simple and
readily available parameters such as blood pressure and heart rate. Most patients will only
have intermittent non-invasive monitoring of blood pressure. During the induction phase an
abrupt reduction in blood pressure is often seen, with possible deleterious consequences for
organ perfusion [1,2]. The availability of continuous monitoring of systemic haemodynamics is
limited by cost and scarcity of equipment and personnel.
The peripheral perfusion index (PPI) is obtained non-invasively by photoplethysmography -
ubiquitously present in the perioperative setting [3,4]. The PPI is a simple ratio describing
the proportion of pulsatile to non-pulsatile signal attenuation. No specialized equipment is
needed as the PPI is inherent to photoplethysmography already ubiquitous during GA, although
not all pulse-oxymeters are set up to display PPI. The PPI in awake patients is dominated by
sympathetic tone [4] creating a highly positively skewed distribution [3]. Conversely, during
GA cardiac stroke volume (SV) becomes the major determinant of PPI [5,6]. Very little
evidence exists regarding the efficacy of PPI as a monitor during the induction of GA.
Presumably, the net effect will be a composite of two opposing mechanisms: Sympatholysis
increasing PPI, with decreased SV/CO causing the opposite effect.
The present study was designed to explore the clinical utility of the non-invasively obtained
peripheral perfusion index to detect cardiovascular compromise during induction of general
anaesthesia. We hypothesized that during induction of GA changes in systemic haemodynamics in
the form of mean arterial pressure (MAP) and cardiac stroke volume (SV) and -output (CO)
during GA would be reflected in the PPI, albeit in a complex manner. Thus, a predominant
vasodilatory response might be differentiated from a response dominated by decreased CO.
1. Sessler DI, Meyhoff CS, Zimmerman NM, Mao G, Leslie K, Vásquez SM, et al.
Period-dependent Associations between Hypotension during and for Four Days after
Noncardiac Surgery and a Composite of Myocardial Infarction and Death. Anesthesiology
[Internet]. 2018 [cited 2018 Nov 30];128:317-27. Available from:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29189290
2. Salmasi V, Maheshwari K, Yang D, Mascha EJ, Singh A, Sessler DI, et al. Relationship
between Intraoperative Hypotension, Defined by Either Reduction from Baseline or
Absolute Thresholds, and Acute Kidney and Myocardial Injury after Noncardiac Surgery.
Anesthesiology [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2018 Nov 30];126:47-65. Available from:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27792044
3. Lima AP, Beelen P, Bakker J. Use of a peripheral perfusion index derived from the pulse
oximetry signal as a noninvasive indicator of perfusion. Crit Care Med [Internet]. 2002
[cited 2018 Jan 11];30:1210-3. Available from:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12072670
4. Reisner A, Shaltis PA, McCombie D, Asada HH. Utility of the photoplethysmogram in
circulatory monitoring. Anesthesiology. 2008;108:950-8.