Impact of Production Pressure in the Block Room on Patient Safety

Anesthesia Clinical Trial

Official title:

Examining the Impact of Production Pressure in the Regional Anesthesia Block Room on Patient Safety, a Randomized Single Blind Study in a High Fidelity Simulation Environment

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT04846660
• Other study ID #: 2021-2533
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: March 20, 2021
• Est. completion date: May 30, 2021

Study information

• Verified date: August 2021
• Source: Ciusss de L'Est de l'Île de Montréal
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This randomized, single blinded simulation based study investigates the impact that production pressure can have on the safety of patients undergoing regional anesthesia. We created a high fidelity scenario where anesthesiologists and trainees were to perform a single shot infraclavicular ultrasound guided block. Participants were randomly assigned to the intervention or control group. Participants assigned to the intervention group were exposed to various production pressure generating interventions. The goal of this study was to look at the impact of production pressure on patient safety by scoring anesthesiologists' and trainees' performance and examining the differences between the two groups.

Description:

Sample size: To our knowledge, no studies were performed to evaluate the impact of production pressure on anesthesiologists nor on how to emulate production pressure in a simulated environment. Although it is known that production pressure affects negatively healthcare workers' performance, it remains difficult to predict its impact on a scoring system such as the RAPS assessment tool. Therefore, we used a convenience sample based on the number of residents and staffs anesthesiologists who agreed to participate. Using the t value and the degrees-of-freedom of the unpaired t-test, the investigators calculated the effect size (r) to characterize the magnitude of the effect and evaluate if the sample size is enough to answer the research hypothesis. An r value of around 0.2 was considered a "weak" effect, 0.5 "medium", and 0.8 "strong". We intend to recruit between 10 to 20 participants in each group. Scenario: Participants were asked to obtain consent and perform a single shot infraclavicular ultrasound guided block on a 50 year old woman with mild COPD. The simulation took place in situ in a regional anesthesia block room. Upon entering the room, the anesthesiology evaluation was already completed. A CAE infraclavicular block simulator was installed on a simulated patient. A simulated anesthesiology nurse was also present to assist only. All preparation steps and safety measures had to be initiated by the participant. Participants in the intervention group were exposed to 4 standardized pre-recorded audio interventions, encouraging them to proceed faster. The choice of these interventions was based on articles and surveys detailing the common sources of production pressure for the anesthesiologist. Data collection: Performances were filmed in order to be reviewed by three regional anesthesia experts. Participants were then asked to fulfill a questionnaire in another room. This form included a validated task load index grid (NASA) to quantify the amount of stress experienced, demographic data and a realism score.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 39
• Est. completion date: May 30, 2021
• Est. primary completion date: May 30, 2021
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: N/A and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• To be a certified anesthesiologist or anesthesiology resident
• To have performed at least 10 regional anesthesia techniques including 5 infraclavicular blocks
• To consent to the study

Exclusion Criteria:

• To refuse to participate

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Anesthesia
• Patient Safety

Intervention

Other:
• Production pressure
Participant exposed to production pressure

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Canada	Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont	Montreal	Quebec

Sponsors (3)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Ciusss de L'Est de l'Île de Montréal	Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Université de Montréal

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Canada, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	RAPS score	Score obtained from regional anesthesia experts using the RAPS assessment tool, a validated tool to measure performance of a regional anesthesia technique (see reference)	Through scenario completion (approximatively 25 minutes)
Secondary	Time to complete the task	Time between skin asepsis and needle withdrawal	Through scenario completion (approximatively 25 minutes)
Secondary	Stress level experienced	As measured by the NASA task load index, a validated tool to measure mental and physical stress experience during a task.; The participant has to rate each 6 category on a continous scale of 21 points as shown below.; Mental Demand From very low to very high Physical Demand From very low to very high Temporal demand From very low to very high Performance From perfect to failure (This scale in interpreted in a reverse way) Effort From very low to very high Frustration From very low to very high The next step for the participant is to do a pairwise comparison of each category by selection the most contributive.; Results are presented with transformation of the 21 points to a 100 points scale as a rating from 0 to 100 ( Low to high task load) By using pairwise comparison, a weighted global result is also presented with a score from 0 to 100 (Low to high task load)	Through scenario completion (approximatively 25 minutes)