Anesthesia Clinical Trial
— ARTEMIDEOfficial title:
Comparison of Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Place Block Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Intra and Postoperative Pain Control in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT number | NCT04839445 |
Other study ID # | 2909 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Completed |
Phase | N/A |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | February 22, 2021 |
Est. completion date | August 31, 2022 |
Verified date | April 2022 |
Source | AUSL Romagna Rimini |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The anesthetic techniques for videolaparoscopic surgery include general anesthesia, and locoregional anesthesia in association with general anesthesia in order to reduce or abolish post-operative pain with a simultaneous reduction in the use of opioids and days of hospital stay. From the studies published so far on videolaparoscopic surgery in general, it is clear that the transversus abdominal plane (TAP) block could have a role in reducing the stretch wall pain secondary to pneumoperitoneum and incisional, although its role in this regard is not yet clear, nor significant statistically results have been produced. The use of erector spinae plane (ESP) block for the management of visceral pain is finding more and more space in the literature, with promising results. For videolaparoscopic gynecological surgery, the techniques of locoregional anesthesia studied in association with general anesthesia, up to now, include wall blocks, TAP block and ESP block, while neuraxial anesthesia has no indications in this regard. Although videolaparoscopic hysterectomy is considered less painful than the open-abdomen technique, it requires careful management of post-operative pain. The pain of this surgery is the result of the sum of incisional pain, at the insertion points of the laparoscopic trocars, pain due to pneumoperitoneum usually referred to the shoulder, and visceral pain purely dependent on surgical maneuvers. There is currently no strong evidence to support the use of locoregional anesthesia techniques in videolaparoscopic gynecological surgery. Few studies have been produced about this topic, and they are mostly case series or randomized controlled trials that take into consideration only one technique among those possible. To date, no study compares the various techniques to evaluate the possible superiority of one over the other. In our hospital anesthesists carry out, in normal clinical practice, all the aforementioned local anesthesia techniques. The purpose of our work is to evaluate, with a randomized non-sponsored study, the efficacy of the ESP block and the TAP block for intra and post-operative pain control in videolaparoscopic hysterectomy, and to compare the two techniques. Based on the evidence available in the literature, the two techniques are already part of the current clinical practice of the Anesthesia Unit of our hospital and the choice of one technique over the other is based on anesthetist clinical evaluation to date. The anesthetists involved in the study are adequately trained on both anesthetic procedures.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 78 |
Est. completion date | August 31, 2022 |
Est. primary completion date | August 31, 2022 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Female |
Age group | 18 Years to 85 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - American society of anesthesiologists (ASA) I-III risk - no contraindication to the execution of the peripheral nerve block - signature of the informed consent - total videolaparoscopic surgery (no conversion to open-abdomen) Exclusion Criteria: - allergies and / or contraindications to the administration of the drugs used in the study - infections and injuries at the puncture site - BMI =40 - history of opioid abuse or use of opioids in chronic therapy |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Italy | AUSL Romagna M. Bufalini Hospital | Cesena | Emilia Romagna |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
AUSL Romagna Rimini |
Italy,
Bagaphou CT, Santonastaso DP, Rispoli M, Piraccini E, Fusco P, Gori F. Bilateral continuous erector spinae plane block: an alternative to epidural catheter for major open abdominal surgery. Minerva Anestesiol. 2020 Sep;86(9):993-994. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9 — View Citation
Jones JH, Aldwinckle R. Interfascial Plane Blocks and Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery: A Narrative Review. Local Reg Anesth. 2020 Oct 23;13:159-169. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S272694. eCollection 2020. Review. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Postoperative pain control | Evaluate the difference between the two groups regarding post-operative pain using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) 0= better outcome; 10=worse outcome Score will be measured on the numeric rating scale (NRS), an NRS = 4 will be considered as effective antalgic coverage. | 12 hours | |
Secondary | Intra operative use of opioids. | Mcg of Remifentanil consumed during surgery. | Surgery time. | |
Secondary | Post operative use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs | Mg of ketorolac or any others anti-inflammatory drugs administered after surgery. | 2-6-12-24-36 postoperative hours | |
Secondary | Post operative use of opioids | Mg of opioids administered after surgery. | 2-6-12-24-36 postoperative hours | |
Secondary | Postoperative nausea and / or vomiting | Quantity of antiemetic drugs required to control nausea and vomiting episodes | 2-6-12-24-36 postoperative hours | |
Secondary | Days of hospital stay | The number of days of hospitalization after surgery will be assessed | 3 days | |
Secondary | Assessment of patient satisfaction with the anesthesiological technique | Patients is requested to fill out a pre-printed sheet on their judgment of the anesthesiological procedure, in which they can express a value from 0 to 5, where 0 indicates "entirely dissatisfied" and 5 indi- cates "very satisfied"expressed by the patient according to the following scale: satisfied, very satisfied, not at all satisfied | 36 hours |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04580030 -
Tricuapid Annular Plane Sistolic Excursion Before General Anesthesia Can Predict Hypotension After Induction
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04279054 -
Decreased Neuraxial Morphine After Cesarean Delivery
|
Early Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT03640442 -
Modified Ramped Position for Intubation of Obese Females.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04099693 -
A Prospective Randomized Study of General Anesthesia Versus Anesthetist Administered Sedation for ERCP
|
||
Terminated |
NCT02481999 -
Pre- and Postoperative EEG-Monitoring for Children Aged From 0,5 to 8 Years
|
||
Completed |
NCT04235894 -
An Observer Rating Scale of Facial Expression Can Predict Dreaming in Propofol Anesthesia
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05525104 -
The Effect of DSA on Recovery of Anaesthesia in Children (Het Effect Van DSA op Het Herstel na Anesthesie Bij Kinderen).
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05024084 -
Desflurane and Sevoflurane Minimal Flow Anesthesia on Recovery and Anesthetic Depth
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT04204785 -
Noise in the OR at Induction: Patient and Anesthesiologists Perceptions
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03277872 -
NoL, HR and MABP Responses to Tracheal Intubation Performed With MAC Blade Versus Glidescope
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT03940651 -
Cardiac and Renal Biomarkers in Arthroplasty Surgery
|
Phase 4 | |
Terminated |
NCT02529696 -
Measuring Sedation in the Intensive Care Unit Using Wireless Accelerometers
|
||
Completed |
NCT05346588 -
THRIVE Feasibility Trial
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT03704285 -
Development of pk/pd Model of Propofol in Patients With Severe Burns
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05259787 -
EP Intravenous Anesthesia in Hysteroscopy
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02894996 -
Does the Response to a Mini-fluid Challenge of 3ml/kg in 2 Minutes Predict Fluid Responsiveness for Pediatric Patient?
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05386082 -
Anesthesia Core Quality Metrics Consensus Delphi Study
|
||
Terminated |
NCT03567928 -
Laryngeal Mask in Upper Gastrointestinal Procedures
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06074471 -
Motor Sparing Supraclavicular Block
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04163848 -
CARbon Impact of aNesthesic Gas
|