McGRATH vs Macintosh Laryngoscopy Comparison in LMA Insertion

Anesthesia Clinical Trial

— GRAN-PALM  

Official title:

Comparison Between McGRATH and Macintosh Laryngoscopy in Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT04509453
• Other study ID #: UNUD-CTR-FK270720-003
• Secondary ID: 1320/UN14.2.2.VI
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: August 30, 2020
• Est. completion date: November 1, 2020

Study information

• Verified date: December 2020
• Source: Udayana University
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Various techniques have been developed to get a good LMA position, one of them is using a laryngoscope. The most popular laryngoscope used for LMA installation is the Macintosh type. Technological developments have brought laryngoscopes into the video era, one of which is McGRATH's laryngoscope, which from several studies about having an advantage in terms of the first attempt, time, complications, and hemodynamic stability of intubation. It needs to be proven through research on the comparison of clinical outcomes of LMA installation with McGrath laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 102
• Est. completion date: November 1, 2020
• Est. primary completion date: October 30, 2020
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 65 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patients underwent surgery with general anesthesia by LMA insertion in Sanglah General Hospital

• Agreed to be included in the study by signing informed consent

• American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status 1-2

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients unfit for LMA insertion

• Patients with suspected airway management difficulty

• Pregnancy

• Morbid obese

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Anesthesia
• Intubation Complication
• Intubation;Difficult

Intervention

Device:
• McGRATH laryngoscopy
Patients who underwent general anesthesia with LMA insertion by using McGRATH video layngoscopy
• Macintosh laryngoscopy
Patients who underwent general anesthesia with LMA insertion by using classic Macintosh video layngoscopy

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Indonesia	Sanglah General Hospital	Denpasar	Bali

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Udayana University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Indonesia, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Number of participants with first-attempt success	Successful LMA insertion within first attempt	immediately after LMA insertion
Primary	Mean arterial pressure	Mean arterial pressure measured by non-invasive blood pressure monitor	immediately after LMA insertion
Primary	Heart rate	Heart rate measured by standard monitor	immediately after LMA insertion
Secondary	Time required	Time required for LMA insertion using the respective method	immediately after LMA insertion
Secondary	Complications	Incidence of hoarseness or throat pain due to LMA insertion	An hour after the the end of surgery