Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03277872
Other study ID # 2018-1144
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date September 5, 2017
Est. completion date July 2, 2021

Study information

Verified date October 2021
Source Ciusss de L'Est de l'Île de Montréal
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Prospective, randomized and controlled who will be conducted in Maisonneuve-Rosemont hospital and whose objectives are: - To observe if the alterations of the NoL index and the standard monitoring (Mean Arterial Blood Pressure and Heart Rate) (using the variability of NoL index and standard monitoring, peak NoL index and peak standard monitoring values, and number of time passed over their respective threshold for nociceptive response) are more accentuated after laryngoscopy using the classical MAC blade versus single-use disposable blade of the Glidescope. - To observe the nociceptive response (using the variability of NoL index and standard monitoring, peak NoL index and peak standard monitoring values, and number of time passed over their respective threshold for nociceptive response) related to the insertion of endotracheal tube between vocal cords during the intubation. Study plans to enroll 50 adult patients scheduled to undergo either general, gynecological, neurological, orthopedic, plastic or urological surgery under general anesthesia and who necessitate endotracheal intubation.


Description:

The purpose of this prospective pragmatic study is to evaluate the changes in NoL index, Heart Rate (HR) and Mean Arterial Blood Pressure (MABP) following the painful stimulus that represents laryngoscopy and intubation performed using either the single use blade of the Glidescope (group GVL) or the classically used MAC blade (group MAC). Calculation will be using the variations of NoL, HR and MABP, the peak values of these 3 parameters, and also the area above the curve of each parameter for 3 minutes (above the mean pre-stimulus values) and the amount of time (out of 3 minutes post-stimulus) those 3 parameters will be significantly higher than their respective pre-intubation mean thresholds. In this prospective, randomized and controlled study, each patient will normally enter the operating room on the day of his surgery. All the normal monitors are installed, along with the NoL monitor. Pre-oxygenation (with 100% 02) is then started. While the patient is doing the pre-oxygenation, MABP, HR and NoL index measures are gathered to establish a baseline for each patient. Once pre-oxygenation is over, induction with xylocaïne, propofol, remifentanil and rocuronium is given (according to patients' ideal weight). The end of the remifentanil bolus will correspond to the time 0 of our study. To be sure our patients are sleeping and on the same level of anesthetic medication during our study, perfusions of propofol and remifentanil will be administred until tracheal intubation and inhaled anesthetic gaz given. When the patient is asleep and apneic, a Guedel device (chosen according to patient weight and height) is inserted in the mouth, as in usual practice, to ease the manual ventilation until the laryngoscopy. The patient is then ventilated with a face mask. After 5 minutes, the first laryngoscopy is performed (either with GlideScope blade or MAC blade according to randomization). Once a Cormack-Lehane grade I or II is obtained, the movement is ended, and the patient is ventilated again for 4 minutes with the Guedel. If the procedure takes more than 30 seconds to perform (if no view of grade I or II is seen before 30 seconds), the laryngoscopy is considered difficult and the patient will be excluded from the study. At T9 (9 minutes after T0), the second laryngoscopy is done (either with the MacIntosh blade or the GVL blade - the tool used for the second laryngoscopy will always be the one that wasn't used at the first laryngoscopy). The size of the MacIntosh blade (MAC 3 or 4) or the disposable blade for GVL is decided according to the patient size (height and weight). At the second laryngoscopy, the endotracheal tube is still not inserted, only the procedure of laryngoscopy is done, so that we can evaluate the hemodynamic and the NoL index responses related only to the type of device used for laryngoscopy. Then, the operator replaces the Guedel and ventilates the patient with a facemask (100% O2) for 4 more minutes, without stimulating the patient otherwise. At T13 (13 minutes after T0), the third laryngoscopy will be performed (either with the single-use blade for GlideScope or the MacIntosh blade - according to randomization). This time, the ETT is inserted (size 7 or 8, depending on the size and sex of the patient). After ETT insertion, the patient is then ventilated with the anesthesia machine and the perfusions of propofol/remifentanil is discontinued. Monitors will record HR, MABP and NoL index until 3 minutes after the ETT insertion (end of the study). All the data will be electronically registered every 5 seconds and exported in an anonymous manner for each patient into an excel file at the end of the study. In this study, each patient is exposed to three laryngoscopies; one with the single use blade for the GlideScope, one with the Macintosh laryngoscopy and one with the ETT insertion (laryngoscopy done with either GlideScope or Macintosh according to randomization). Hence, each patient will be its own control. It will then be more reliable to compare the differences in nociceptive response according to the tool used for laryngoscopy.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 50
Est. completion date July 2, 2021
Est. primary completion date November 7, 2017
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - ASA status I or II - Mallampati class I or II - Patients > 18 years old - Elective general, gynecological, neurological, orthopedic, plastic or urological surgery under general anesthesia - Type of surgery that usually necessitate endotracheal intubation and controlled ventilation Non-inlusion Criteria: - Patient refusal - History of psychiatric diseases or psychological problems (including mental retardation); inability to give consent; language barrier. - Anticipated difficult airway (Mallampati class III and IV, thyromental distance < 6 cm, mouth opening < 3 cm, neck extension <80° and neck flexion <35°, inability to prognath, meaning bringing lower mandibular before the upper maxilla) - Patient with history of neck rigidity or instability - BMI > 30 - Patient with beard (because of recognized risk for difficult ventilation) - Patient with history of oropharyngeal or tracheal surgery (excluding adenoidectomy, amygdalectomy and teeth removal) - Severe coronary artery disease - Serious cardiac arrhythmias (including atrial fibrillation) - Use of ß-blockers (all types) - History of opioid or illicit drug substance abuse - Chronic use of psychotropic and/or opioid drugs - Allergy to remifentanil or propofol - Pregnancy - Contraindications to mask ventilation (GI tract obstruction, pregnancy, active GERD, non-fasting patients) - Difficult mask ventilation (before randomization at the first laryngoscopy) Exclusion Criteria: - Unexpected difficult airway requesting excessive, possibly painful airway manipulations - Requiring hemodynamic support with vasopressors or inotropes 5 minutes before first laryngoscopy to 3 minutes after insertion of ETT

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Laryngoscopy with GlideScope (GVL) Blade
st Laryngoscopy with GVL Blade nd Laryngoscopy with MAC Blade rd Laryngoscopy and ETT insertion with either GVL or MAC Blade according to 2nd randomization
Laryngoscopy with MacIntosh (MAC) Blade
st Laryngoscopy with MAC Blade nd Laryngoscopy with GVL Blade rd Laryngoscopy and ETT insertion with either GVL or MAC Blade according to 2nd randomization

Locations

Country Name City State
Canada Hopital Maisonneuve Rosemont, CIUSSS de l'Est de l'Ile de Montreal Montréal-Est Quebec

Sponsors (3)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Ciusss de L'Est de l'Île de Montréal Canadian Hospital Specialties Ltd, Verathon

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Canada, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Delta NoL To compare the variation of NoL (delta NoL) after laryngoscopy using the single use blade for Glidescope (GVL) versus MAC blade (MAC) in anesthetized patients From 30 seconds before to 3 minutes after each laryngoscopy (3 total) for each patient
Secondary Delta Heart Rate To compare the variation of the standard hemodynamic parameter after laryngoscopy using the single use blade for Glidescope (GVL) versus MAC blade (MAC) in anesthetized patients From 30 seconds before to 3 minutes after each laryngoscopy (3 total) for each patient
Secondary Delta Mean Arterial Blood Pressure To compare the variation of the standard hemodynamic parameter after laryngoscopy using the single use blade for Glidescope (GVL) versus MAC blade (MAC) in anesthetized patients From 30 seconds before to 3 minutes after each laryngoscopy (3 total) for each patient
Secondary Peak value of NoL To compare the peak value of NoL after laryngoscopy in the GVL group versus the MAC group From 30 seconds before to 3 minutes after each laryngoscopy (3 total) for each patient
Secondary Peak value of Heart Rate To compare the peak value of standard hemodynamic parameter after laryngoscopy in the GVL group versus the MAC group From 30 seconds before to 3 minutes after each laryngoscopy (3 total) for each patient
Secondary Peak value of Mean Arterial Blood Pressure To compare the peak value of standard hemodynamic parameter after laryngoscopy in the GVL group versus the MAC group From 30 seconds before to 3 minutes after each laryngoscopy (3 total) for each patient
Secondary Amount of time (in seconds) Mean Arterial Blood Pressure is over its baseline value after laryngoscopy stimulus To compare the amount of time (in seconds) the MABP will spend over its respective mean pre-stimulus value after laryngoscopy with GVL versus MAC From 30 seconds before to 3 minutes after each laryngoscopy (3 total) for each patient
Secondary Amount of time (in seconds) NoL, is over its baseline value after laryngoscopy stimulus To compare the amount of time (in seconds) the NoL will spend over its respective mean pre-stimulus values after laryngoscopy with GVL versus MAC From 30 seconds before to 3 minutes after each laryngoscopy (3 total) for each patient
Secondary Amount of time (in seconds) Heart Rate is over its baseline value after laryngoscopy stimulus To compare the amount of time (in seconds) the HR will spend over its respective mean pre-stimulus value after laryngoscopy with GVL versus MAC From 30 seconds before to 3 minutes after each laryngoscopy (3 total) for each patient
Secondary Area Under the Curve for NoL for GVL versus MAC blade To compare the area under the curve between GVL versus MAC-Dl laryngoscopy that NoL spends above its baseline value and calculated for the 3 minutes after the stimulus From 30 seconds before to 3 minutes after each laryngoscopy (3 total) for each patient
Secondary Area Under the Curve for Heart Rate for GVL versus MAC blade To compare the area under the curve between GVL versus MAC-Dl laryngoscopy that HR spends above its baseline value and calculated for the 3 minutes after the stimulus From 30 seconds before to 3 minutes after each laryngoscopy (3 total) for each patient
Secondary Area Under the Curve for Mean Arterial Blood Pressure for GVL versus MAC blade To compare the area under the curve between GVL versus MAC-Dl laryngoscopy that MABP spends above its baseline value and calculated for the 3 minutes after the stimulus From 30 seconds before to 3 minutes after each laryngoscopy (3 total) for each patient
Secondary Variation of NoL for laryngoscopy versus laryngoscopy + endotracheal intubation To compare the variation of NoL after the laryngoscopy alone versus laryngoscopy + endotracheal tube (ETT) insertion in the GVL and the Mac group From 30 seconds before to 3 minutes after each laryngoscopy (3 total) for each patient
Secondary Variation of HR for laryngoscopy versus laryngoscopy + endotracheal intubation To compare the variation of HR after the laryngoscopy versus laryngoscopy + endotracheal tube (ETT) insertion in the GVL and the Mac group From 30 seconds before to 3 minutes after each laryngoscopy (3 total) for each patient
Secondary Variation of MABP for laryngoscopy versus laryngoscopy + endotracheal intubation To compare the variation of MABP after the laryngoscopy versus laryngoscopy + endotracheal tube (ETT) insertion in the GVL and the Mac group From 30 seconds before to 3 minutes after each laryngoscopy (3 total) for each patient
Secondary Peak value of NoL for laryngoscopy versus laryngoscopy + endotracheal intubation To compare the peak value of NoL after the laryngoscopy + endotracheal tube (ETT) insertion in the GVL and the Mac group From 30 seconds before to 3 minutes after each laryngoscopy (3 total) for each patient
Secondary Peak value of HR for laryngoscopy versus laryngoscopy + endotracheal intubation To compare the peak value of HR after the laryngoscopy + endotracheal tube (ETT) insertion in the GVL and the Mac group From 30 seconds before to 3 minutes after each laryngoscopy (3 total) for each patient
Secondary Peak value of MABP for laryngoscopy versus laryngoscopy + endotracheal intubation To compare the peak value of MABP after the laryngoscopy + endotracheal tube (ETT) insertion in the GVL and the Mac group From 30 seconds before to 3 minutes after each laryngoscopy (3 total) for each patient
Secondary Area Under the Curve of NoL for laryngoscopy versus laryngoscopy + endotracheal intubation To compare the AUC of NoL after the laryngoscopy + endotracheal tube (ETT) insertion in the GVL and the Mac group From 30 seconds before to 3 minutes after each laryngoscopy (3 total) for each patient
Secondary Area Under the Curve of HR for laryngoscopy versus laryngoscopy + endotracheal intubation To compare the AUC of HR after the laryngoscopy + endotracheal tube (ETT) insertion in the GVL and the Mac group From 30 seconds before to 3 minutes after each laryngoscopy (3 total) for each patient
Secondary Area Under the Curve of MABP for laryngoscopy versus laryngoscopy + endotracheal intubation (with both devices) To compare the AUC of MABP after the laryngoscopy + endotracheal tube (ETT) insertion in the GVL and the Mac group From 30 seconds before to 3 minutes after each laryngoscopy (3 total) for each patient
Secondary Delta NoL analyzed according to order of randomization to see if this order influences its response To compare the influence of the order of the tool used for laryngoscopies with the variation of NoL, after laryngoscopy using the single use blade for Glidescope (GVL) and MAC blade (MAC) in anesthetized patients From 30 seconds before to 3 minutes after each laryngoscopy (3 total) for each patient
Secondary Delta Heart Rate analyzed according to order of randomization to see if this order influences its response To compare the influence of the order of the tool used for laryngoscopies with the variation of HR, after laryngoscopy using the single use blade for Glidescope (GVL) and MAC blade (MAC) in anesthetized patients From 30 seconds before to 3 minutes after each laryngoscopy (3 total) for each patient
Secondary Delta Mean Arterial Blood Pressure analyzed according to order of randomization to see if this order influences its response To compare the influence of the order of the tool used for laryngoscopies with the variation of MABP, after laryngoscopy using the single use blade for Glidescope (GVL) and MAC blade (MAC) in anesthetized patients From 30 seconds before to 3 minutes after each laryngoscopy (3 total) for each patient
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT04279054 - Decreased Neuraxial Morphine After Cesarean Delivery Early Phase 1
Active, not recruiting NCT04580030 - Tricuapid Annular Plane Sistolic Excursion Before General Anesthesia Can Predict Hypotension After Induction
Completed NCT03640442 - Modified Ramped Position for Intubation of Obese Females. N/A
Recruiting NCT04099693 - A Prospective Randomized Study of General Anesthesia Versus Anesthetist Administered Sedation for ERCP
Terminated NCT02481999 - Pre- and Postoperative EEG-Monitoring for Children Aged From 0,5 to 8 Years
Completed NCT04235894 - An Observer Rating Scale of Facial Expression Can Predict Dreaming in Propofol Anesthesia
Recruiting NCT05525104 - The Effect of DSA on Recovery of Anaesthesia in Children (Het Effect Van DSA op Het Herstel na Anesthesie Bij Kinderen). N/A
Recruiting NCT05024084 - Desflurane and Sevoflurane Minimal Flow Anesthesia on Recovery and Anesthetic Depth Phase 4
Completed NCT04204785 - Noise in the OR at Induction: Patient and Anesthesiologists Perceptions N/A
Terminated NCT03940651 - Cardiac and Renal Biomarkers in Arthroplasty Surgery Phase 4
Terminated NCT02529696 - Measuring Sedation in the Intensive Care Unit Using Wireless Accelerometers
Completed NCT05346588 - THRIVE Feasibility Trial Phase 3
Terminated NCT03704285 - Development of pk/pd Model of Propofol in Patients With Severe Burns
Recruiting NCT05259787 - EP Intravenous Anesthesia in Hysteroscopy Phase 4
Completed NCT02894996 - Does the Response to a Mini-fluid Challenge of 3ml/kg in 2 Minutes Predict Fluid Responsiveness for Pediatric Patient? N/A
Completed NCT05386082 - Anesthesia Core Quality Metrics Consensus Delphi Study
Terminated NCT03567928 - Laryngeal Mask in Upper Gastrointestinal Procedures N/A
Recruiting NCT06074471 - Motor Sparing Supraclavicular Block N/A
Completed NCT04163848 - CARbon Impact of aNesthesic Gas
Completed NCT03740815 - Feasibility of Serratus Plane Block Associated With Sedation in Axillary Dissection N/A