Anesthesia, Local Clinical Trial
Official title:
Lateral Sagittal Versus Costoclavicular Approach for Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: Comparison of Block Dynamics and Patient Comfort
NCT number | NCT04356521 |
Other study ID # | CC0255 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Completed |
Phase | N/A |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | May 1, 2020 |
Est. completion date | October 20, 2020 |
Verified date | October 2020 |
Source | Ondokuz Mayis University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
An ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block performed with the costoclavicular (CC) approach and the lateral sagittal (LS) approach will be compared in patients scheduled for forearm and hand surgery.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 109 |
Est. completion date | October 20, 2020 |
Est. primary completion date | October 1, 2020 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 65 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Age 18 years to 65 years - Patients scheduled for elective forearm and hand surgeries - Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 1-3 Exclusion Criteria: - Patients not consenting/unwilling to participate - Age <18 years or >65 years - Patients with ASA 4 - Obesity (BMI >30 kg/m2) - Regional anesthesia contraindicated (thrombocytopenia, infection at injection site) - Severe renal, cardiac, or hepatic disease - History of hypersensitivity or allergy to local anesthetics - History of opioid or steroid use for more than 4 weeks - History of psychiatric disorders - Analgesic treatment in the last 48 hours preoperatively - Operations lasting less than 60 minutes and more than 180 minutes - Patients who converted to general anesthesia |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Turkey | Ondokuz Mayis University | Samsun | Atakum |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Ondokuz Mayis University |
Turkey,
Kavrut Ozturk N, Kavakli AS. Comparison of the coracoid and retroclavicular approaches for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block. J Anesth. 2017 Aug;31(4):572-578. doi: 10.1007/s00540-017-2359-6. Epub 2017 Apr 18. — View Citation
Layera S, Aliste J, Bravo D, Fernández D, García A, Finlayson RJ, Tran DQ. Single- versus double-injection costoclavicular block: a randomized comparison. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Mar;45(3):209-213. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-101167. Epub 2020 Jan 14. — View Citation
Leurcharusmee P, Elgueta MF, Tiyaprasertkul W, Sotthisopha T, Samerchua A, Gordon A, Aliste J, Finlayson RJ, Tran DQH. A randomized comparison between costoclavicular and paracoracoid ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block for upper limb surgery. Can J Anaesth. 2017 Jun;64(6):617-625. doi: 10.1007/s12630-017-0842-z. Epub 2017 Feb 15. — View Citation
Mistry T, Balavenkatasubhramanian J, Natarajan V, Kuppusamy E. Ultrasound-guided bilateral costoclavicular brachial plexus blocks for single-stage bilateral upper limb surgeries: Abstain or indulge. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Oct-Dec;35(4):556-557. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_222_18. — View Citation
Monzó E, Hadzic A. Costoclavicular approach to the brachial plexus block: simple or double injection? Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Sep 29. pii: rapm-2019-100852. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-100852. [Epub ahead of print] — View Citation
Oh C, Noh C, Eom H, Lee S, Park S, Lee S, Shin YS, Ko Y, Chung W, Hong B. Costoclavicular brachial plexus block reduces hemidiaphragmatic paralysis more than supraclavicular brachial plexus block: retrospective, propensity score matched cohort study. Korean J Pain. 2020 Apr 1;33(2):144-152. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2020.33.2.144. — View Citation
Silva GR, Borges DG, Lopes IF, Ruzi RA, Costa PRRM, Mandim BLDS. [Ultrasound-guided costoclavicular block as an alternative for upper limb anesthesia in obese patients]. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2019 Sep - Oct;69(5):510-513. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2019.01.004. Epub 2019 Sep 10. Portuguese. — View Citation
Songthamwat B, Karmakar MK, Li JW, Samy W, Mok LYH. Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: Prospective Randomized Comparison of the Lateral Sagittal and Costoclavicular Approach. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Nov;43(8):825-831. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000822. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Performance time of the operator | Time elapsed from when the needle enters the skin after an optimal view is obtained on ultrasound until the block needle exits the skin after the procedure is completed. | During the block procedure | |
Primary | Duration of start of motor block | Time from when a Lovett score of 5 is seen in at least 1 of 3 cords in the patient extremity on which the operation is being performed, following local anesthetic injection.
Lovett rating scale: 6 = normal muscle strength, 5 = slightly decreased muscle strength, 4 = significantly decreased muscle strength, 3 = slight loss of movement, 2 = significant loss of movement, 1 = near total loss of movement, and 0 = total paralysis. Motor block cord myotomes will be evaluated as medial cord (thumb adduction = ulnar nerve), lateral cord (elbow flexion = mucocutaneous nerve), and posterior cord (wrist extension = radial nerve). |
45 minutes after the block procedure | |
Primary | Start time of the nervous block | Time from the local injection to when a pin-prick test yields no response in at least 1 of 3 cords in the extremity on which the operation is being performed. | 45 minutes after the block procedure | |
Secondary | Time of sensory block | Time when the patient describes pain or when the pin-prick test yields a positive response in the extremity on which the operation is performed. | Postoperative Day 1 | |
Secondary | Time of motor block | Time when Lovett score is 2 at any of the 3 dermatomes of the extremity on which the operation is being performed.
Lovett rating scale 6 = normal muscle strength, 5 = slightly decreased muscle strength, 4 = significantly decreased muscle strength, 3 = slight loss of movement, 2 = significant loss of movement, 1 = near total loss of movement, and 0= total paralysis. Motor block cord myotomes will be evaluated as medial cord (thumb adduction=ulnar nerve), lateral cord (elbow flexion= mucocutaneous nerve), and posterior cord (wrist extension=radial nerve). |
Postoperative Day 1 | |
Secondary | Patient Satisfaction | The discomfort produced by the procedure will be evaluated using the visual rating scale (VRS) at the end of the operation day.
VRS: 0-100, 0 = no discomfort at all, 100 = excessive discomfort. |
Postoperative Day 1 | |
Secondary | Surgeon Satisfaction | Surgeon satisfaction will be evaluated at the end of the operation day using the VRS.
VRS: 0-100, 0 = no discomfort at all, 100 = excessive discomfort. |
Postoperative Day 1 | |
Secondary | Number of needle redirections | Number of needle redirections until target area is reached: number of attempts to withdraw and redirect the needle without total withdrawal from the skin. | During the block procedure | |
Secondary | Number of needle attempts | Number of needle attempts required until target area is reached: number of withdrawals and redirections of the needle with total withdrawal from the skin. | During the block procedure | |
Secondary | Number of patients who required a rescue block | Patients subjected to an additional rescue block due to positivity in a pin-prick test at a sensorial examination 45 minutes after the block procedure; these patients will be recorded. | 45 minutes after the block procedure | |
Secondary | Time of first analgesic request | Time at which the first analgesic is requested. | Postoperative Day 1 |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03663478 -
Continuous TQL Block for Elective Cesarean Section
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT04513652 -
A Study of the Safety and Anesthetic Effect of AG-920 Topical Ophthalmic Solution
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT05464862 -
The Effect of PPB Using 10, 20 and 30 ml of Lidocaine, Study on Volunteers
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT04690647 -
The Efficacy of Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for Analgesia After Elective Total Hip Replacement.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03245359 -
Pain Management After TKA: Comparison of Short- and Long-term Nerve Blocks
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06028126 -
Superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block in Cardiac Surgery Trial
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05815563 -
Validation of Peripheral Perfusion Index in Predicting Successful Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block in Pediatrics
|
||
Completed |
NCT01418690 -
Changes in Tissue Oxygenation Following Regional Anesthesia
|
N/A | |
Suspended |
NCT03291691 -
Protective Nerve Stimulation in Regional Anesthesia
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03545516 -
Wound Infiltration as Part of an Opioid Free Pain Management Pathway Following Cesarean Delivery
|
Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05038007 -
Pain After Lung Cancer Surgery - Comparing Traditional Versus Prolonged Release Nerve Blockades
|
Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT03672500 -
Perineal Local Infiltration Study
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT06057090 -
Do Therapy Dogs Improve Behavior and Reduce Anxiety in Pediatric Dental Patients?
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05415865 -
The Effect of Local Anesthetic Solution in the Bladder Prior to Botox Injections in the Bladder
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06011005 -
Efficacy of Ethyl Chloride Topical Anesthesia Application on the Pain Perception During Intra-oral Injections in Children in Comparison to Benzocaine Gel.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04536311 -
Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures While Awake or Under Appropriate Sedation by Paravertebral Block
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03600454 -
The Effect of Anesthesia on Perioperative Muscle Weakness and Neuro-endocrine Stress Response
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03159338 -
Platelet-rich Fibrin on Nerve Regeneration After Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02966067 -
A Split Mouth Trial to Compare Microneedles vs. Standard Needles in Dental Anaesthetic Delivery
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03305666 -
Trial of Injected Liposomal Bupivacaine vs Bupivacaine Infusion After Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures
|
Phase 4 |