Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Withdrawn

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03779659
Other study ID # H-37546
Secondary ID
Status Withdrawn
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date July 2021
Est. completion date February 2023

Study information

Verified date June 2021
Source Boston University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Dental Fear and Anxiety (DFA) are at higher levels among children and often leads to avoidance of dental treatment. Negative experiences in the early years such as experience of pain during injections, fillings, or extractions may lead to difficulties in treatment and behavior management among children. During dental procedures such as restorations and extractions injectable anesthetics are required as they are used to anesthetize and numb the area around the tooth receiving treatment. Topical anesthetics are used prior to using injectable anesthetic to alleviate some pain and discomfort. Topical anesthetics should be used with caution as they consist of more concentrated doses of pharmaceutical elements used in injectable anesthetics. Such high concentrations can result in increased gag reflux, central nervous system depression and cardiovascular effects in rare cases. With many recent advances in dental treatment, there is also a need for new non-pharmaceutical strategies to alleviate pain and discomfort among children which in turn will motivate children and their parents to visit the dental clinic more frequently. Electronic anesthesia or Synapse Transcutaneous Electronic Nerve Stimulation (TENS), a non-invasive device that uses low energy electrical stimulation to reduce pain perception, has gained acceptance since the 1990s. Advantages of using the TENS device are that it is safe, easy to use, well-accepted among patients as evidenced in the few trials conducted so far, no adverse complications and has been successful in alleviating pain during dental procedures. This study aims to explore use of the TENS to alleviate pain and discomfort at the oral mucosal site where the patient will receive a local anesthetic injection. In this randomized case-crossover trial among children aged 6-14 years the effectiveness of Aleve TENS device in reducing pain and anxiety among children prior to receiving injectable local anesthetic agent during dental procedures is compared to those who receive the local anesthetic gel prior to receiving local anesthetic injection.


Description:

Children between 6-14 years will be recruited at the Pediatric Oral Healthcare Center. A sample of 100 male and female children who fit the inclusion and exclusion criteria are recruited. Once parents' consent at the first visit basic demographic information, dental and medical history information is collected. This study is conducted in total of two clinic visits. In the first visit participants are randomized to either the intervention group or the comparison group. The intervention group receives the experimental device (TENS) prior to local anesthetic injection whereas the comparison group receives the local anesthetic gel. Following this the participants receive the local anesthetic injection after which treatment is completed. In the second visit the participants are crossed over to the other group and therefore randomization is not used for visit 2. Those who received the local anesthetic gel in visit 1 will receive the experimental device in visit 2 and those who received the experimental device in visit 1 will receive the local anesthetic gel in visit 2 . Following this treatment procedures are completed.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Withdrawn
Enrollment 0
Est. completion date February 2023
Est. primary completion date December 2022
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 6 Years to 14 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Children who are healthy and without any major medical conditions - Children who are patients at the Pediatric Oral Healthcare Center - Children requiring restoration on the occlusal surface that involves tooth preparation up to the dentin level in at least two primary or permanent molars or children requiring extractions of primary or permanent molars. - Children who are scheduled for at least two appointments and who require two restorative procedures or two extractions than can be scheduled over two separate appointments Exclusion Criteria: - Children who have contraindications to local anesthetic - Children with teeth requiring restoration and have pulp involvement and root resorption on radiological examination (i.e. deep caries) - Children who have major medical problems - Children taking medications for major medical illnesses - Children who have pacemakers - Children with ADD/ADHD, autism or Down's syndrome and children with a history of behavioral issues that required previous management.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Synapse TENS device
At the time of local anesthetic application the TENS device will be activated and placed on the buccal and lingual alveolar mucosa adjacent to the tooth receiving the restorative treatment using the pad applicator. The tip of the device with the electrodes are placed in a vertical up and down motion for approximately ten seconds. Following this, the level of pain and anxiety are measured using the Wong Baker Scale and Visual Analog Scale. The TENS device is used for achieving localized pain relief at the site of local anesthetic injection prior to injecting the anesthetic agent (such as lidocaine or articaine). Following this, once the clinician ensures that the patient is pain free then local anesthetic injection is given and following that the dental procedures are conducted.
Drug:
Topical anesthetic gel
The local anesthetic gel is typically used for achieving localized pain relief at the site of local anesthetic injection and this is part of standard care that is followed prior to dental procedures. The amount of local anesthetic used will not exceed the maximum allowable dose, which will be calculated for each patient based on his/her age and weight prior to the dental procedure

Locations

Country Name City State
United States BU Henry M. Goldman School of Dental Medicine Boston Massachusetts

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Boston University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (15)

Abdulhameed SM, Feigal RJ, Rudney JD, Kajander KC. Effect of peripheral electrical stimulation on measures of tooth pain threshold and oral soft tissue comfort in children. Anesth Prog. 1989 Mar-Apr;36(2):52-7. — View Citation

Alvesalo I, Murtomaa H, Milgrom P, Honkanen A, Karjalainen M, Tay KM. The Dental Fear Survey Schedule: a study with Finnish children. Int J Paediatr Dent. 1993 Dec;3(4):193-8. — View Citation

American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington DC, American Psychiatric Press. 1994.

Armfield JM, Milgrom P. A clinician guide to patients afraid of dental injections and numbness. SAAD Dig. 2011 Jan;27:33-9. — View Citation

Baghdadi ZD. Evaluation of electronic dental anesthesia in children. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999 Oct;88(4):418-23. — View Citation

Boyce RA, Kirpalani T, Mohan N. Updates of Topical and Local Anesthesia Agents. Dent Clin North Am. 2016 Apr;60(2):445-71. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2015.12.001. Review. Erratum in: Dent Clin North Am. 2017 Apr;61(2):xiii. — View Citation

Cho SY, Drummond BK, Anderson MH, Williams S. Effectiveness of electronic dental anesthesia for restorative care in children. Pediatr Dent. 1998 Mar-Apr;20(2):105-11. — View Citation

Cianetti S, Lombardo G, Lupatelli E, Pagano S, Abraha I, Montedori A, Caruso S, Gatto R, De Giorgio S, Salvato R. Dental fear/anxiety among children and adolescents. A systematic review. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2017 Jun;18(2):121-130. doi: 10.23804/ejpd.2017.18.02.07. — View Citation

Dhindsa A, Pandit IK, Srivastava N, Gugnani N. Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of electronic dental anesthesia with 2% lignocaine in various minor pediatric dental procedures: A clinical study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2011 Jan;2(1):27-30. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.79305. — View Citation

Lee HS. Recent advances in topical anesthesia. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Dec;16(4):237-244. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2016.16.4.237. Epub 2016 Dec 31. Review. — View Citation

Ogle OE, Mahjoubi G. Local anesthesia: agents, techniques, and complications. Dent Clin North Am. 2012 Jan;56(1):133-48, ix. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2011.08.003. Review. — View Citation

Oztas N, Olmez A, Yel B. Clinical evaluation of transcutaneous electronic nerve stimulation for pain control during tooth preparation. Quintessence Int. 1997 Sep;28(9):603-8. — View Citation

Shim YS, Kim AH, Jeon EY, An SY. Dental fear & anxiety and dental pain in children and adolescents; a systemic review. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Jun;15(2):53-61. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2015.15.2.53. Epub 2015 Jun 30. Review. — View Citation

teDuits E, Goepferd S, Donly K, Pinkham J, Jakobsen J. The effectiveness of electronic dental anesthesia in children. Pediatr Dent. 1993 May-Jun;15(3):191-6. — View Citation

Yap AU, Ho HC. Electronic and local anesthesia: a clinical comparison for operative procedures. Quintessence Int. 1996 Aug;27(8):549-53. — View Citation

* Note: There are 15 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Presence of Pain before treatment The presence of pain will be a simple question in the case report form with two answer choices: yes or no. before the start of each treatment procedure up to 6 months
Primary Presence of Pain before local analgesic injection The presence of pain will be a simple question in the case report form with two answer choices: yes or no. after TENS or gel administration before local analgesic injection at about 1 minute
Primary Presence of Pain after treatment The presence of pain will be a simple question in the case report form with two answer choices: yes or no. about 45 minutes at the end of the treatment visit
Primary Level of pain before treatment based on Wong-Baker Faces (WBF) pain rating scale Level of pain will be measured using the Wong-Baker Faces (WBF) pain rating scale. The scale is a set of six cartoon faces with varying facial expressions ranging from a smile/laughter to tears. Each face has a numeric value from 0 to 5, with higher values indicating more pain. Based on child's selection of the facial expression a score will be assigned. before the start of each treatment procedure up to 6 months
Primary Level of pain before local analgesic injection based on Wong-Baker Faces (WBF) pain rating scale Level of pain will be measured using the Wong-Baker Faces (WBF) pain rating scale. The scale is a set of six cartoon faces with varying facial expressions ranging from a smile/laughter to tears. Each face has a numeric value from 0 to 5, with higher values indicating more pain. Based on child's selection of the facial expression a score will be assigned. after TENS or gel administration before local analgesic injection at about 1 minute
Primary Level of pain after treatment based on Wong-Baker Faces (WBF) pain rating scale Level of pain will be measured using the Wong-Baker Faces (WBF) pain rating scale. The scale is a set of six cartoon faces with varying facial expressions ranging from a smile/laughter to tears. Each face has a numeric value from 0 to 5, with higher values indicating more pain. Based on child's selection of the facial expression a score will be assigned. about 45 minutes at the end of the treatment visit
Primary Level of dental anxiety before treatment using Visual Analog Scale Level of anxiety will be measured using the Visual Analog Scale. The scale is a simple line with the number line ranging from 0 to 10. Children are asked how nervous or confident they feel and are asked to point or mark on the line. The corresponding numerical value will be noted for each patient. before the start of each treatment procedure up to 6 months
Primary Level of dental anxiety before local analgesic injection using Visual Analog Scale Level of anxiety will be measured using the Visual Analog Scale. The scale is a simple line with the number line ranging from 0 to 10. Children are asked how nervous or confident they feel and are asked to point or mark on the line. The corresponding numerical value will be noted for each patient. after TENS or gel administration before local analgesic injection at about 1 minute
Primary Level of dental anxiety after treatment using Visual Analog Scale Level of anxiety will be measured using the Visual Analog Scale. The scale is a simple line with the number line ranging from 0 to 10. Children are asked how nervous or confident they feel and are asked to point or mark on the line. The corresponding numerical value will be noted for each patient. about 45 minutes at the end of the treatment visit
Secondary Patient's comfort level preference The comfort or preference level for TENS device versus local anesthetic gel prior to local anesthetic injection will be assessed by asking the participants about their preference using a question in the case report form with five answer choices (using Likert scale - Very uncomfortable, somewhat uncomfortable, neither comfortable nor uncomfortable, somewhat comfortable, very comfortable).. up to 6 months
Secondary Treatment completion status Treatment completion status will be recorded as 'completed' or 'partially completed' on the Case Report Form at the conclusion of each treatment visit. up to 6 months
Secondary Reason for partially completed treatment For participants that do not complete both treatment procedures and are categorized as 'incomplete', the reason/s why will be documented. up to 6 months
Secondary Supplemental anesthetic use Amount of supplemental anesthesia if used for each of the two treatment procedures will be recorded in clinic notes after each treatment procedure. up to 6 months
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03663478 - Continuous TQL Block for Elective Cesarean Section Phase 4
Completed NCT04513652 - A Study of the Safety and Anesthetic Effect of AG-920 Topical Ophthalmic Solution Phase 3
Completed NCT05464862 - The Effect of PPB Using 10, 20 and 30 ml of Lidocaine, Study on Volunteers Phase 4
Completed NCT04690647 - The Efficacy of Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for Analgesia After Elective Total Hip Replacement. N/A
Completed NCT03245359 - Pain Management After TKA: Comparison of Short- and Long-term Nerve Blocks N/A
Recruiting NCT06028126 - Superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block in Cardiac Surgery Trial N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05815563 - Validation of Peripheral Perfusion Index in Predicting Successful Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block in Pediatrics
Completed NCT01418690 - Changes in Tissue Oxygenation Following Regional Anesthesia N/A
Suspended NCT03291691 - Protective Nerve Stimulation in Regional Anesthesia
Not yet recruiting NCT03545516 - Wound Infiltration as Part of an Opioid Free Pain Management Pathway Following Cesarean Delivery Phase 2
Not yet recruiting NCT05038007 - Pain After Lung Cancer Surgery - Comparing Traditional Versus Prolonged Release Nerve Blockades Phase 2
Terminated NCT03672500 - Perineal Local Infiltration Study N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT06057090 - Do Therapy Dogs Improve Behavior and Reduce Anxiety in Pediatric Dental Patients? N/A
Recruiting NCT05415865 - The Effect of Local Anesthetic Solution in the Bladder Prior to Botox Injections in the Bladder Phase 3
Recruiting NCT06011005 - Efficacy of Ethyl Chloride Topical Anesthesia Application on the Pain Perception During Intra-oral Injections in Children in Comparison to Benzocaine Gel. N/A
Completed NCT04536311 - Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures While Awake or Under Appropriate Sedation by Paravertebral Block N/A
Completed NCT03600454 - The Effect of Anesthesia on Perioperative Muscle Weakness and Neuro-endocrine Stress Response N/A
Recruiting NCT03159338 - Platelet-rich Fibrin on Nerve Regeneration After Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy N/A
Completed NCT02966067 - A Split Mouth Trial to Compare Microneedles vs. Standard Needles in Dental Anaesthetic Delivery N/A
Completed NCT03305666 - Trial of Injected Liposomal Bupivacaine vs Bupivacaine Infusion After Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures Phase 4