View clinical trials related to Anesthesia, Dental.
Filter by:The aim of this clinical study is to evaluate the success of buccal infiltration (BI) anesthesia + intraligamentary (ILI) anesthesia between inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) anesthesia + buccal infiltration anesthesia in mandibular molar teeth with acute symptomatic irreversible pulpitis.The main questions it aims to answer are: - Does the anesthesia techniques adequate to perform root canal treatment painlessly? - Which technique achieved pulpal anesthesia? Participants were allocated in two groups according to the randomization blocks, with a total of 25 patients in each group. In IANB + BI anesthesia techniques, a total of approximately 2.8 ml of anesthetic solution, 1.8 ml + 1 ml, was applied, while for BI + ILI, a total of approximately 1.72 ml, 1 ml + 0.72 ml, was administered. Then, root canal treatment was performed. Researchers were compared the success of anesthesia techniques in different stages of root canal treatment.
Optimal anesthesia is an essential requirement for successful dentoalveolar intervention.To achieve this goal,different anesthetic agents and techniques are available. Inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) remains the most commonly used anesthetic technique. However, after the worldwide approval of articaine, a relatively new local anesthetic with enhanced tissue diffusion properties, many studies on healthy volunteers have investigated the anesthetic efficacy of buccal articaine infiltration and IANB in the mandibular posterior teeth and reported comparable results. Infiltration anesthesia is technically more straightforward, less stressful to the patient, and associated with higher success and lower complication rates than block anesthesia. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of local infiltration anesthesia using 4% articaine in the analgesia of deciduous and permanent molars in children aged 5-18 years and mandibular premolars in children aged 10-18 years.
Local anesthetic administration step is mandatory step for controlling pain before dental procedures. The aim of this study was to compare effectiveness of topical Benzocaine 18% gel patch form and Benzocaine 20% topical gel in reducing pain during injection of local anesthesia in children receiving dental treatment.
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of two types of local anesthesia (articaine and lidocaine) for infiltration anesthesia during restorative dental procedures on lower teeth in pediatric patients. The patients will require similar dental operative procedures on both right and left sides of the mandible in order to qualify for this study. The study will require at least two dental appointments, where a randomized, cross-over study methodology will be utilized. All subjects will be treated by the same dentist. The comfort of the patient will be assessed at various points during the procedure using the Wong-Baker Faces Scale.
In children, behavior management is critical to the success of pediatric dental procedures. Most of the studies on local anesthesia performed in children deal with the question how to avoid or minimize pain during injection. Due to the sensation of numbness children scratch the soft tissues and bite lips and tongue. In many cases, this may be kept in children's memory as a "painful experience" and may affect their behavior in the following visit. The purpose of this study is to evaluate children's reactions to the administration of local anesthetic injection in the mandible (mandibular block) and in the maxilla (supraperiosteal infiltration), and to assess their behavior in the following visit related to each type of injection.
This Phase 3 study is designed as a multicenter, randomized, blinded, controlled study to evaluate the efficacy, pharmacodynamics, and safety of NV-101 administered as a submucosal injection following completion of a restorative or periodontal maintenance procedure requiring local anesthesia with an agent containing a vasoconstrictor. Local vasodilation that results in more rapid clearance of the anesthetic is the proposed mechanism of action.
This Phase 3 clinical study is designed as a multicenter, randomized, blinded, controlled study to evaluate the efficacy, pharmacodynamics, and safety of NV-101 administered as a submucosal injection following completion of a restorative or periodontal maintenance procedure requiring local anesthesia with an agent containing a vasoconstrictor. Local vasodilatation that results in more rapid clearance of the anesthetic is the proposed mechanism of action.
This Phase 2 clinical study is designed as a multicenter, randomized, blinded, controlled study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of NV-101 in approximately 150 children 4 to 11 years of age. NV-101 or sham injection is administered at the completion of a dental procedure requiring local anesthesia with 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. The dental procedure(s) shall be performed in a single quadrant of the mouth and include cavity preparation, restoration/filling, teeth cleaning (non-surgical scaling and/or root planing), or crowns.