View clinical trials related to Anastomosis.
Filter by:The goal of this preclinical trial is to learn about the benefits and limitations of novel robotic devices for microsurgery, based on different levels of microsurgical experience. The main questions it aims to answer are: Is robot-assisted microsurgery faster, better and more ergonomic than conventional microsurgery in a preclinical standardized setting? Participants will perform microvascular anastomoses on 1.0-mm-diameter artificial silicone vessels using a conventional manual approach versus a novel robot-assisted approach. Researchers will compare the performance of novices, advanced participants and experts to evaluate the role of microsurgical experience when learning the new technique.
Compared with traditional manual suturing, mechanical anastomosis can reduce the error caused by human factors. The electric anastomotic device can improve the automation and accuracy of anastomosis, reduce the requirements for doctors' operation, and establish a more standardized usage specification, thereby reducing the surgical complication rate and improving the quality of anastomosis. The clinical study of electric tubular anastomotic device adopts a multicenter, randomized, parallel controlled non-inferior study design, and randomly groups according to the 1:1 ratio to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of electric tubular anastomotic device compared with conventional manual device.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare approaches to enterostomy reversal by hand-sewn end-to-end anastomosis versus side-to-side anastomosis (sub-divided into hand-sewn side-to-side anastomosis and stapled side-to-side anastomosis). The main question it aims to answer is: • If either of the approaches are better than the other with respect to success rates, efficacy, post-operative complications and overall morbidity. Participants admitted for stoma reversal will be divided into two groups: 1. EE: Conventional Hand-sewn end-to-end anastomosis, and 2. SS: Side-to-side anastomosis, which will be further divided into 2 sub-groups: 1. HSSA: Hand-sewn side-to-side anastomosis 2. SSSA: Stapled side-to-side anastomosis Researchers will compare the EE group to SS group overall, and a second comparison will be made between EE, HSSA and SSSA groups, to see: 1. Rates of major post-operative complications 2. Rates of short-term complications (within 30 days of surgery) 3. Rates of re-operation 4. Post-operative length of stay in the hospital
A clinical trial to assess the efficacy, mechanism of action and safety of the Colovac+ Colorectal Anastomosis Protection Device in providing temporary protection of the anastomosis in subjects undergoing lower anterior resection for colorectal cancer
Colorectal surgery is highly associated with septic complications, therefore, multiple approaches have been used to reduce this complications, one of the most used is mechanical bowel preparation. Lately multiple studies have suggested that mechanical bowel preparation might not be necessary.
Traditionally the watertightness of urethrovesical anastomosis after robotic radical prostatectomy is controlled by cystogram. However, clinical observations and one previous study showed that patients with anastomotic leakage have red coloured urine. If the investigators can verify this finding, the most of the cystograms can be avoided. In this study the investigators estimate urine colour after cystogram and take a picture from urine collecting pag. Later on the pictures are digitally analyzed and compared to cystogram finding.