Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Not yet recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05933343 |
Other study ID # |
CCF06282023 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Not yet recruiting |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
July 10, 2023 |
Est. completion date |
July 31, 2025 |
Study information
Verified date |
June 2023 |
Source |
The Cleveland Clinic |
Contact |
Sameh H Rizkalla, M.D. |
Phone |
5513309230 |
Email |
rizkals[@]ccf.org |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Drainage seton is usually placed for long-term control of symptoms, and hence it has to be
effective in drainage of infection, durable, and comfortable to the patients. The present
study assumes that different seton materials would attain different drainage capacities,
variable durability and impact on QoL. Therefore, the study aims to compare two commonly used
seton materials; Ethibond suture and vessel loop, in the management of CAF in terms of
effectiveness in draining infection, percent of seton break and its timing, and change in
patients' QoL as measured by a validated questionnaire.
Description:
The use of seton as a surgical therapy for fistulous disease has been first described by
Hippocrates in 430 BCE. Since then several authors have used either cutting or drainage seton
to treat CAF. Different materials have been used as seton, including sutures, stainless steel
wires, catheters, cables, silicone, and rubber bands. While the main aim of a drainage seton
is to simply drain sepsis and control symptoms in the long term, cutting setons are mainly
used for eradiation of the fistula pathology by cutting through the fistula tract and anal
sphincter muscles, yet at the cost of an increased risk of fecal incontinence (FI).
As the purpose of a drainage seton is to provide long-term, durable drainage of perineal
sepsis and control of symptoms, namely discharge, the seton material can have an impact on
its function and durability. A review of the variations in seton types and materials showed
that the success rates of suture seton (silk, prolene or nylon suture) are higher than those
of Penrose drains and catheters. However, there is a paucity of data on the impact of the
seton material on the durability of seton and quality of life (QoL)
Drainage seton is usually placed for long-term control of symptoms, and hence it has to be
effective in drainage of infection, durable, and comfortable to the patients. The present
study assumes that different seton materials would attain different drainage capacities,
variable durability, and impact on QoL. Therefore, the study aims to compare two commonly
used seton materials; Ethibond suture and vessel loop, in the management of CAF in terms of
effectiveness in draining infection, percent of seton break and its timing, and change in
patients' QoL as measured by a validated questionnaire.