View clinical trials related to Amputation.
Filter by:Researchers aim to compare demographic characteristics, prosthesis type, functional capacity, and quality of life between faller and non-faller transtibial amputees.
This is an observational, prospective multicentric study designed to develop medical knowledge. The aim of the study is to validate the IPAQ-SF questionnaire in a population of lower limb amputee patients. The questionnaire is administered twice to each patient, once during the consultation and again when they return home. Patients also undergo a 6-minute walk test.
The investigators propose to evaluate the efficacy of MyoTrain AR in a prospective clinical study involving 10 individuals with trans-radial upper-limb loss over a period of 35 days. These individuals will be randomized to Group A (Control Group using conventional motor imagery exercises) and Group B (who will train with the MyoTrain AR system pre-prosthetically). The investigators will test the following hypothesis: Pre-prosthetic training with the MyoTrain AR system, as compared to the current standard of care with conventional motor imagery exercises, results in improved subsequent control stability with the prosthesis. Following a baseline functional assessment, participants will undergo a 30-day pre-prosthetic training period specific to their assigned Group. After this training period, participants will repeat the functional assessment. Participants will then receive their prosthetic device and occupational therapy consistent with the current clinical care standard, after which they will again undergo a battery of validated, clinical assessments.
To determine the benefit of the vvibrotactile sensory feedback device.
This research is being done to conduct a preliminary investigation into a new prosthetic microprocessor controlled (MPC) ankle, called the Damping, Stiffness, and Repositioning (DSR) ankle. The DSR ankle is a new design to support a person while they walk on both even and uneven ground, as well as with bending the ankle for safe foot clearance while a person takes a step. In particular, in this study we are interested in seeing how this type of new device may benefit people who are rated as a K2-level ambulator.
The goal of this clinical investigation is to evaluate the clinical benefits of a ventilating suspension interface for individuals with transfemoral amputation. The main aim of the investigation will be to evaluate the clinical user-reported benefits to skin health from using a ventilating lower limb prosthetic suspension system and compare it to a non-ventilating suspension system.
The objective of this study is to develop a virtual rehabilitation system that can be used to effectively treat Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) within the research setting and for at-home use by individuals with upper and lower extremity amputation. We hypothesize that the system will improve PLP for individuals with upper or lower extremity amputation, as measured through with various outcome measures and questionnaires.
The investigators propose to evaluate the efficacy of MyoTrain in a prospective clinical study involving 16 individuals with trans-radial upper-limb loss over a period of 206 days. These individuals will be randomized to Group A (Control Group using standard motor imagery training) and Group B (who are provided the MyoTrain system). The investigators will test three hypotheses: 1. The use of MyoTrain results in skills transference to control of the final prosthesis 2. The virtual outcome measures in MyoTrain are correlated with real-world functional outcome measures 3. The use of MyoTrain results in improved clinical outcomes as measured by functional, subjective and usage metrics Following a baseline functional assessment, participants will undergo a 30-day pre-prosthetic training period specific to their assigned Group. After this training period, participants will receive their prosthetic device and occupational therapy consistent with the current clinical care standard, after which they will again undergo clinical assessment. Post-device delivery, participants will then complete 3 56-day blocks of at-home prosthesis use, in between which they will return to clinic for assessment.
This study will aim at performing biomechanical analyses of the actual load applied on the end of the stump (residuum) of individuals with transfemoral limb loss fitted with bionics bone-anchored prostheses during activities of daily living. The assessment of the inner prosthetic loading will rely on the analyses of common activities of daily living (e.g., walking in straight line and around circles, ascending and descending stairs and slopes, cycling, etc.) performed in experimental and/or clinical and/or open environments. The biomechanical analyses of the load will address the following research questions: A. What is the actual magnitude of the forces and moments applied on transfemoral osseointegrated implant by Rheo Knee and Power Knee during activities of daily living? living? B. What are the determinants of the loading profile in relation to the demographic and anthropometric characteristics, the type and level of activities as well as type, fitting and alignment of Rheo Knee and Power Knee? C. How the loading profiles applied by Rheo Knee and Power Knee compared to usual MPKs and Non-MPK considered below standard of care? Biomechanical data will be collected through a typical cross-sectional cohort study. Each participant will be assessed with a given prosthesis at one particular time (i.e., exposure and outcomes will be both measured at the same time). These biomechanical analyses will rely on already published protocols (e.g., study design, instrumentation setup, extraction of loading profile). Protocols to record load data have been well described by PI-Frossard in over 20 peer-review publications in top-ranked journals. The protocol used in this study has been acknowledged, validated and are commonly used within the fields of biomechanics and prosthetics. The outcome of this study will increase the basic understanding about the effects of loading on the interaction between body and prosthesis (e.g., osseointegration between residual bone and implant). The study will also increase applied knowledge required to establish stronger evidence-based rehabilitation programs, fitting of prosthetic limbs and design of bionics prosthetic components. It is anticipated that, both basic and applied knowledge gain in this study will, all together, contribute to increase the health-related quality of life of individuals fitted with socket and bone-anchored prostheses.
Background: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is the main cause of amputation to the lower limb within the UK, affecting over 20% of adults older than 70 years. After an amputation, individuals often use a wheelchair and do not walk with a prosthetic limb. This is due to them experiencing: older age, muscle weakness, pain, other health conditions limiting ability to exercise eg. heart problems. Healthcare professionals assess physical function with Physical Performance Based Outcome Measures (PerBOMs). A PerBOM requires an individual to complete tasks that are part of their day to day life e.g. walking or balance. PerBOMs are used with for: - Setting goals with patients - Assessing how patients respond to treatment/rehabilitation - Predicting if patients are likely to use a prosthetic limb in the future Previous research shows most of the available PerBOMs are suitable an amputee who walks with a prosthetic limb. However, most vascular amputee patients cannot benefit from these assessments. Therefore, based on this evidence we have developed a new PerBOM to help manage vascular amputees who do not walk with a prosthetic limb. Methods: Qualitative interviews and focus groups with amputee individuals and healthcare professionals who treat them. Approaching individuals who have or will undergo an amputation to their leg due to PAD. Approaching healthcare professionals through professional networks. Interviews and focus groups will take place face to face or remotely by telephone/video conferencing, lasting approximately 1-2 hrs. In the interview or focus group, the researcher will explain and show individuals a video of the new PerBOM and explore their opinions qualitatively on this new PerBOM. All audio will be recorded, written up and analysed. All findings will be presented at scientific conferences. This study has been developed with patients and public involvement.