Diabetes Mellitus Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Prospective, Observational Study in Pancreatic Allograft Recipients: The Effect of Risk Factors, Immunosuppressive Level and the Benefits of Scheduled Biopsies - on Surgical Complications, Rejections and Graft Survival
Several studies have shown acceptable results after Pancreas Transplantation (PTx) by
substituting ATG with basiliximab, which is considered to convey a considerably lower number
of adverse events. However, our experiences with ATG in PTx (introduced in 2004) are good,
and our presumably gentle way of administrating the drug - directed by T-cell counts - is in
fact unique. The potential advantages of reducing the overall corticosteroid (CS) load is
obvious, as CS is a well-known pro-diabetic agent and causes severe long term adverse
effects.
On this background, the investigators have very recently reduced our CS dosing (in the
routine protocol) to a level corresponding to our Kidney Tx protocol (valid since 2009).
Thus, the investigators intend to prospectively investigate a single PTx cohort with the
reduced CS immunosuppressive protocol by an observational study design, and compare with
previous (historical) cohorts, who have received high dose CS.
Study hypotheses: i) Low-dose CS is as effective as high-dose corticosteroids with regards to
efficacy/rejections; ii) The rate of surgical and infectious complications will be similar or
lower in the low-dose group; iii) PTx rejection surveillance by DD (duodenoduodeno-stomy) and
EUSPB (Endoscopic Ultra-Sound guided Pancreas Biopsies) is superior to traditional rejection
surveillance; iv) Patient and graft survival is similar in the two groups
1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
The first pancreas transplantation (PTx) was performed in Minnesota in 1966 by Kelly and
colleagues (1). In recent years the number of procedures has grown considerably
worldwide, and is now a well established treatment option for patients with diabetes
mellitus with and without concomitant diabetic End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) (2-4). The
indication for PTx is advanced and/or badly controlled diabetes mellitus ("brittle"
diabetes, severe hypoglycemic episodes, "unawareness", etc). Solitary pancreas
transplantation (SPT; without concomitant kidney transplantation) is usually classified
as PTx alone (PTA), PTx after kidney transplantation (PAK) or PTx after islet
transplantation (PAI). Kidney transplantation of the diabetic uremic population
increases survival compared to long-term dialysis (5, 6). Transplant options for
patients with diabetic end-stage nephropathy include simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK),
live donor kidney (LDK) and deceased donor kidney (DDK) transplantation. SPK
transplantation relieves not only the patient's uremia, but also alleviates the
hyperglycaemic state of diabetes. Large international patient registries show that
patient survival rates after SPK have reached more than 95% at 1 year and 87% at 5 years
post-transplant, respectively (2). Nevertheless, PTx as treatment for type 1 diabetes
has not gained the same popularity as transplantation of other organs, partly because
PTx have been associated with a high rate of surgical complications; particularly
bleeding, thrombosis and exocrine leakage. Furthermore, there has been a lack of
reliable, non-invasive rejection monitoring instruments, and the invasive, percutaneous
pancreas biopsies have been associated with a high rate of complications.
The difficulties encountered with PTx have to some extent been compensated by a very
selective attitude towards the donors, but thereby making pancreas grafts a scarce
resource. In contrast to other abdominal transplantations such as liver transplantation
(LTx) and kidney transplantation (KTx), where repeated biopsies have been used for
immunosurveillance, percutaneous biopsies of the pancreas-graft have traditionally been
avoided due to a high rate of biopsy-related complications (exocrine leaks/fistulas and
bleeding episodes). Thus, fear of acute rejections and lack of adequate rejection
markers, have led to a rather intensive immunosuppressive load in PTx recipients.
Solitary pancreas transplantation (SPT) has traditionally been subjected to even higher
complication and rejection rates, with inferior graft and patient survival - thus
favoring the combined SPK procedure. This has been attributed to an even worse rejection
monitoring capability, without a "reporter" allograft kidney. No biochemical markers
have proven to be effective in rejection surveillance.
Pancreas graft thrombosis is a feared complication in the postoperative course, partly
due to the oversized vessels used (coeliac trunk/superior mesenteric artery/portal vein)
in conjunction with the low blood flow through an isolated pancreas graft. In the native
setting, these vessels also serve the intestines and spleen. Therefore, PTx poses a
delicate balance between thrombosis and bleeding complications.
The Norwegian experience:
PTx is performed at one single national centre in Oslo, and from 1983 to date 300
procedures have been performed (7-11). In recent years, the activity has increased,
reaching 28 in 2012. Approximately 9 out 10 PTx's have been SPK's. In the first period
from 1983 through 1987, a duct-occluded segmental pancreas was used for transplantation.
From 1988, the whole pancreas graft was used, and the exocrine secretion was drained by
anastomosing the duodenal segment to the urinary bladder. This technical solution was
chosen partly because it offered some sort of rejection monitoring, by urine amylase
counts and cystoscopic pancreas biopsies. However, many patients suffered from chemical
cystitis and metabolic acidosis, due to loss of bicarbonate. In 1998 the urinary bladder
anastomosis was abandoned, in favor of the more physiological enteric anastomosis, the
duodenal segment being connected to the proximal jejunum. However, this solution offered
even less options to monitor upcoming rejections, as percutaneous biopsies was mostly
avoided due to the previously mentioned hazards.
The investigators have recently examined (12) all PTx's performed at the investigators'
hospital during 2006-2010 (n=61; 59 SPK, 2 PTA). The investigators' overall surgical
complication rate has decreased from earlier years, but we still suffer a substantial
rate of reoperations (about 30% of patients), mainly caused by exocrine leakage,
bleeding and vein thrombosis. When comparing the populations with or without
reoperation, higher donor age had a significant negative impact. No significant effect
of donor age on graft survival was observed. There was a tendency towards better results
in female recipients, both regarding surgical complications and graft survival. The
rejection rate (altogether about 30%) was significantly higher in the graft loss group.
From late 2011, several measures have been implemented to improve outcome and reduce the
rate of surgical complications. In line with most Tx centres in Scandinavia, the
investigators have switched the prophylactic anticoagulation treatment from the
investigators' traditional Macrodex® regime to a Heparin®/Fragmin® regime. However, from
June 2016 we give Macrodex intraoperatively and at postoperative 1, and acetylsalicylic
acid is started between postoperative day 3 and 5 instead of at day 7. These measures
were undertaken since our venous thrombosis rate still seem to exeed 20 %. Several
technical changes have also been implemented during recent years; more atraumatic graft
procurement, preserving the entire coeliac arterial axis including the gastroduodenal
artery, obtaining a long portal vein without the need for elongation, as well as
extended in situ dissection by means of LigaSure. Due to the conventional lack of
rejection monitoring parameters, the investigators launched an investigatory
surveillance program, with protocol biopsies of the duodenal segment via double balloon
enteroscopy (13). The impact and value of this program has yet to be investigated.
Previous reports have described separate rejection of the pancreas or kidney in the SPK
setting, and the gold standard for proving rejection of the pancreas is undoubtedly a
biopsy of the pancreas itself. This encouraged us to further develop techniques for
better surveillance, such as Endoscopic transduodenal UltraSound-guided Pancreas
Biopsies (EUSPB). Inferior outcome of PTA and lack of valid tools for immunosurveillance
in the absence of a simultaneous kidney graft, have led some centers to evolve the
duodenoduodenostomy (DD) for drainage of the exocrine pancreas, making the EUSPB
possible. There are many theoretical advantages with the DD, especially regarding
rejection surveillance, and we have recently adopted this technique. The endoscopic
access afforded by the DD also makes it possible to stent the pancreatic duct in case of
exocrine leakage.
Though, in recent years we have experienced a very low incidence of complications with
the conventional percutaneous ultrasound-guided pancreas biopsy. In our latest,
retrospective study (Horneland et al., Am J Transpl; 15(1): 242-50, 2015), focusing on
the duodenoduodenostomy, there were no complications among 18 percutaneous pancreas
biopsies performed.
Immunosuppressive therapy:
Over time, the induction therapy and maintenance immunosuppressive protocols have
changed. From 1983 to 2000, all recipients received triple immunosuppressive regimens
with cyclosporine, azathioprine and prednisolone (CS). During the last part of the
1990's azathioprine was substituted by Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and cyclosporine was
substituted by tacrolimus. After 2000, the immunosuppression has been intensified by
induction therapy both for PTx (Antithymocyte globulin (ATG)) and for kidney transplants
alone (basiliximab). Thus in recent years, PTx recipients have received a quadruple
immunosuppressive regimen, that includes tacrolimus, MMF, high dose CS and ATG. The
dosage of ATG has been directed by T-cell counts.
Rejections/Donor-specific antibodies (DSA):
During recent years, with the quadruple immunnosuppressive regimen, our biopsy-verified
rejection rate has been about 30% (12).
In this study we will follow the routine protocol for treatment of rejections; primarily
more CS (5-8 doses of SoluMedrol), secondarily more ATG (2-5 doses; T-cell directed) A
recent study (14) assessed the role of post-Tx HLA antibody monitoring in the
surveillance of PTx recipients, and the impact of DSA. Four hundred thirty-three PTx's
were performed at the Oxford Transplant Centre (317 SPK/116 Sol-PTx). It was
demonstrated that 39.8% of patients developed de novo HLA antibodies, of which 36.9%
were de novo DSA. The development of antibodies to donor HLA, but not to nondonor HLA,
was significantly associated with poorer graft outcomes, with 1- and 3-year graft
survival inferior in SPK recipients, and interestingly even more so in Sol-PTx
recipients. In a multivariate analysis, development of de novo DSA emerged as a strong
independent predictor of pancreas graft failure.
These findings have urged us to investigate de novo DSA development in the present
study.
Graft monitoring with microdialysis catheters:
As stated in the previous paragraphs the complication rates following pancreas
transplantation are high. Except maybe for severe hemorrhage, all complications have in
common that they are difficult to detect. Accordingly, there is an emerging need for
better monitoring of pancreas transplants. We consider that further improvement of
surgical techniques and immunosuppressive protocols rely upon better monitoring tools.
Microdialysis is a technique, which enables close to 'real time' monitoring of tissues
and organs of interest. Depending on the membrane's pore size, metabolic substances
(lactate, pyruvate, glucose and glycerol) and/or mediators of inflammation (cytokines,
chemokines and complement factors) are sampled in a feasible way (15). So far, the
method's ability to detect brain ischemia is the best validated (16). In the United
States clinical application is so far restricted to neurointensive care units, as only
the brain catheter (CMA 70, CMA Microdialysis AB, Stockholm, Sweden) is approved by the
Food and Drug Administration for clinical use. However, there are more than 2000
clinical reports on microdialysis catheters, and in Europe the catheters are Conformité
Européenne marked for a wider range of indications.
We have done extensive clinical observation trials using microdialysis catheters in
liver transplanted patients and we have inserted more than 200 catheters in hepatic
tissue without experiencing any major complications (17-21).Graft thrombosis has been
detected almost in 'real time' as elevated intrahepatic lactate and lactate to pyruvate
ratio. Rejection has been detected several days before the rise in conventional blood
markers (bilirubin and transaminases) by elevated lactate and with unchanged lactate to
pyruvate ratio. Acute cellular rejections were detected with more than 80 % sensitivity
and specificity. Ischemic complications like hepatic artery thromboses have been
detected with 100 % sensitivity and specificity. We also revealed potentially specific
biomarkers for ischemia (complement factor 5a) and rejection (CXCL-10) (19) . We have
now implemented microdialysis as routine standard of care in pediatric liver
transplants.
We are also investigating the potential role of microdialysis in monitoring patients who
have undergone Whipple's operation for pancreatic or duodenal cancer. Preliminary
results show that leakages in the pancreaticojejunostomy can be detected at a very early
time point, by increased concentrations of glycerol in samples collected from catheters
positioned close to the enteroanastomosis.
2. OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
Several studies have shown acceptable results after PTx by substituting ATG with
basiliximab (14-18), which is considered to convey a considerably lower number of
adverse events. However, the investigators' experiences with ATG in PTx (introduced in
2004) are good, and the investigators presumably gentle way of administrating the drug -
directed by T-cell counts - is in fact unique (12). The potential advantages of reducing
the overall corticosteroid (CS) load is obvious, as CS is a well-known pro-diabetic
agent and causes severe long term adverse effects (14).
On this background, we have very recently reduced our CS dosing (in the routine
protocol) to a level corresponding to our Kidney Tx protocol (valid since 2009). Thus,
we intend to prospectively investigate and compare a single cohort of our present PTx
immunosuppressive protocol with previous (historical) cohorts.
The rationale for the study is that; i) a high immunosuppressive load, and in particular
CS, may be partly responsible for the high rate of PTx associated
complications/reoperations; ii) a high immunosuppressive load is related to infectious
complications; iii) improved PTx rejection surveillance by DD and EUSBP allows a
lower-graded immunosuppressive protocol; iv) evaluating the surgical and medical
measures made to our PTx programme during the past two years
For detailed description of objectives/aims: See "Outcome measures" below.
3. STUDY DESIGN
This is a prospective, single cohort observational study, aimed at using a historical
control group as comparison. It will be conducted at our single, national centre for
organ transplantation in Oslo. All pancreas recipients > 18 years of age, who fulfill
the inclusion criteria, will prior to transplantation be asked for inclusion.
4. DURATION OF STUDY
All consecutive PTx recipients during 3-5 years are planned to be enrolled, with a
intended number of 60-80 patients. The study will continue until all patients have
completed a minimum of 60 months of follow-up or have discontinued participation in the
study.
5. NUMBER OF PATIENTS
60-80 patients will be enrolled in the study and all will receive the standard quadruple
immunosuppressive regime with reduced CS dosing compared with previous cohorts
(according to newly changed routine protocol).
6. SELECTION OF PATIENTS See "Eligibility Criteria" below.
7. DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION
7.1 Immunosuppression
The single cohort study group will receive our routine immunosuppressive regimen based on
ATG, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids as follows:
7.1.1 ATG (Thymoglobulin): Initiated at day 0 (the first dose preoperatively) at a dose of
2,5 mg/kg i.v. Later dosing is directed by T-cell counts once daily. The T-cells are kept
suppressed for 10 days post-Tx, and new doses of 1,0-2,5 mg/kg i.v. is given whenever the
T-cell count rises above 0,050 x109. Altogether, 2-4 doses of ATG is usually needed.
7.1.2 Tacrolimus:
Initiated at day 0 (the first dose preoperatively) at a dose of 0,06 mg/kg x 2 p.o., later
adjusted to achieve steady state whole-blood trough levels as follows:
Month 1-3 8-12 ng/ml Month 3-6 4-8 ng/ml
7.1.3 Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF): MMF will be given 1000 mg twice daily. It can be reduced
to 750mg twice daily in case of adverse events and further down to 500mg in case of
persisting adverse events.
7.1.4 Corticosteroids: Day 0 : Methylprednisolone 250 mg i.v. (peroperatively) Day 1-14:
Prednisolone 20 mg x 1 p.o. Day 15-28: Prednisolone 15 mg x 1 p.o. Day 29-60: Prednisolone 10
mg x 1 p.o. Day 61- 180: Prednisolone 7,5 mg x 1 p.o. Day 181 - : Prednisolone 5 mg x 1 p.o.
7.2 Concomitant Treatments
7.2.1 Required treatment
i) Prophylaxis against the development of Pneumocystis carinii, with trimethoprim-sulfa is
required for all patients during the first 6 months of treatment.
ii) Prophylaxis against Cytomegalovirus (CMV) with valganciclovir for 3 months, if the donor
is CMV + and the recipient is CMV ÷. - By all other CMV constellations, preemptive
valganciclovir treatment is given, based on weekly CMV-PCR analyses (cut off: CMV-PCR count >
0).
iii) Antibiotic prophylaxis with meropenem (2 doses) and vancomycin (1 dose) at day 0.
(iv) Proton pump inhibitor (pantoprazole/esomeprazole) is given for at least 2 months
post-Tx.
7.2.2 Prohibited treatment
i) Investigational study drugs ii) NSAID's should be avoided iii) Terfenadine, cisapride,
astemizole, pimozide, cimetidine and ketoconazole are not allowed.
8. ANALYSES OF RESULTS
8.1 Power calculations
By conventional presumptions (Power 1-β=80%, α=0,05) based on binomial distribution, 3-400
patients (and 3-400 historical controls) would be needed to detect a 33% relative change in
rejection/complication rates.
However, regarding practicability:
(i) It is totally unrealistic - for any Tx-center in the world - to include 3-400 PTx
patients, during any reasonable time frame. In Oslo, the investigators are by far the highest
volume center in Scandinavia. The investigators' 28 PTx's performed in 2012 represent 5,6
p.m.p. (per million population), which actually is far higher than any other country in the
world. Even if the investigators cooperated with all the other PTx centers in Scandinavia
(Uppsala/Göteborg/Helsinki), the potential would not exceed 50 patients per year.
(ii) The maximally realistic number of PTx patients to be included in Oslo during a
reasonable time frame (2-3 years) will be 60-80.
(iii) Thus, the investigators' intentions with regard to statistical Power have to be more
modest - for a single cohort observational study. And a doubled rejection rate can be
detected at 80% Power with only 42 patients.
(iv) The prospects/visions of this study consists of a lot more than detecting significant
changes in rejection/complication rates. The simultaneous biopsy strategy (D- + P- +
K-biopsies) is unique. And the 'molecular biology' analyses of these simultaneous biopsies
and blood samples have the potential to provide new insights. Furthermore, "new" potential
rejection markers (C-peptide; CRP/Amylase/Lipase combined parameter) will be explored.
8.2 Statistical methods in data analysis
- The analysis of categorical parameters will consist of:
i) Comparisons of groups using the Fisher exact test. ii) Confidence intervals of 95% of
the percentage of incidence of these events.
- The loss of grafts and deaths will be analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method for estimating
the time to events.
- Continuous (non-categorical) variables will be analyzed by student t-tests and
chi-square tests.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03743779 -
Mastering Diabetes Pilot Study
|
||
Completed |
NCT03786978 -
Pharmaceutical Care in the Reduction of Readmission Rates in Diabetes Melitus
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01804803 -
DIgital Assisted MONitoring for DiabeteS - I
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05039970 -
A Real-World Study of a Mobile Device-based Serious Health Game on Session Attendance in the National Diabetes Prevention Program
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04507867 -
Effect of a NSS to Reduce Complications in Patients With Covid-19 and Comorbidities in Stage III
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04068272 -
Safety of Bosentan in Type II Diabetic Patients
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT03243383 -
Readmission Prevention Pilot Trial in Diabetes Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03730480 -
User Performance of the CONTOUR NEXT and CONTOUR TV3 Blood Glucose Monitoring System (BGMS)
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02690467 -
Efficacy, Safety and Acceptability of the New Pen Needle 34gx3,5mm.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02229383 -
Phase III Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Added Exenatide Versus Placebo to Titrated Basal Insulin Glargine in Inadequately Controlled Patients With Type II Diabetes Mellitus
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT05799976 -
Text Message-Based Nudges Prior to Primary Care Visits to Increase Care Gap Closure
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06181721 -
Evaluating Glucose Control Using a Next Generation Automated Insulin Delivery Algorithm in Patients With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04489043 -
Exercise, Prediabetes and Diabetes After Renal Transplantation.
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT03319784 -
Analysis for NSAID VS Corticosteroid Shoulder Injection in Diabetic Patients
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT03542084 -
Endocrinology Auto-Triggered e-Consults
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02229396 -
Phase 3 28-Week Study With 24-Week and 52-week Extension Phases to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Exenatide Once Weekly and Dapagliflozin Versus Exenatide and Dapagliflozin Matching Placebo
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05544266 -
Rare and Atypical Diabetes Network
|
||
Completed |
NCT01892319 -
An International Non-interventional Cohort Study to Evaluate the Safety of Treatment With Insulin Detemir in Pregnant Women With Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Pregnancy Registry
|
||
Completed |
NCT05031000 -
Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems: Discounter Versus Brand
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04039763 -
RT-CGM in Young Adults at Risk of DKA
|
N/A |