Alcohol Treatment Outcomes Following Early vs. Standard Liver Transplant for SAH

Alcohol Use Disorder Clinical Trial

Official title:

Alcohol Treatment Outcomes Following Early vs. Standard Liver Transplant for Severe Alcoholic Hepatitis (SAH)

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03845205
• Other study ID #: IRB00152700
• Secondary ID: P50AA027054
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: November 20, 2020
• Est. completion date: January 2025

Study information

• Verified date: September 2023
• Source: Johns Hopkins University
• Contact: MARY E MCCAUL, PhD
• Phone: 410-955-9526
• Email: mmccaul1[@]jhmi.edu
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Given the severe consequences of alcohol relapse following liver transplantation for alcoholic hepatitis (AH-LT), it is critical to accurately identify alcohol use and implement alcohol interventions early in the post-transplant period to optimize patient outcomes. The proposed randomized clinical trial will examine the implementation and effects of integrated, person- and computer-delivered alcohol treatment compared to standard care on alcohol use (assessed by self-report and biomarker), mood, quality of life and survival following AH-LT. Predictors of 12-month post-transplant alcohol outcomes will be explored to allow future improved tailoring and targeting of these treatments.

Description:

In the United States, alcoholic liver disease (ALD) is the second most common indication for liver transplant (LT). Traditionally, ALD patients have been required to complete a six-month mandatory period of alcohol abstinence before LT. More recently early LT for severe alcoholic hepatitis is being performed without any pre-transplant alcohol treatment because of the high medical acuity and mortality associated with this disease. Importantly, the limited studies to-date demonstrate comparable survival among early (ELT) versus standard (SLT) transplant recipients. Return to alcohol use is a major concern for all LT recipients with ALD, with estimates of alcohol relapse ranging between 16 and 49%. Although most LT clinics have enforced pre-LT alcohol treatment, far less attention has been paid to post-LT services, despite the high risk and severe consequences of relapse during this period. Numerous evidence-based treatments are available for alcohol use disorder (AUD). In recent years, the investigators and others have developed web- and text-based versions of these empirically-supported interventions to expand the reach and replicability outside of formal alcohol clinic settings. Delivery of AUD interventions in non-traditional settings is feasible, acceptable to patients, and effective in reducing alcohol use. The investigators propose to implement and evaluate the effects of alcohol treatment integrated into routine post-LT care. All patients receive physician instructions to stop drinking and engage in alcohol services (treatment as usual: TAU). ELT (N=100) and SLT (N=100) patients will be randomized on a 2:1 basis to integrated AUD treatment (IAT) or TAU. IAT will include computer-delivered BI in the hospital, nurse-delivered alcohol monitoring counseling at each outpatient LT follow-up visit, and at-home participation in web-based, 7-session CBT4CBT, supplemented by tailored text messages. Also, because of the evidence that ALD patients significantly underreport drinking to LT providers, the investigators will compare post-LT alcohol relapse rates using a well-validated biomarker of recent drinking (PEth), patient self-report on a validated alcohol instrument, and patient report to LT provider. Finally, the investigators will identify predictors of post-LT alcohol use and treatment engagement for ELT and SLT patients. Key measures will include: alcohol use; engagement in alcohol treatment; retention in post-transplant follow-up care; mood and anxiety; and quality of life. Given the severe consequences of alcohol relapse among both ELT and SLT recipients, it is critical to accurately identify alcohol use and implement alcohol interventions early in the post-transplant period to optimize short- and long-term patient outcomes and ultimately tailor treatments for this high-risk population.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 200
• Est. completion date: January 2025
• Est. primary completion date: January 2025
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• English speaking

Exclusion Criteria:

• too medically/psychiatrically ill to participate
• not able to provide informed consent due to cognitive impairment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Alcohol Use Disorder
• Alcoholic Hepatitis
• Alcoholism
• Hepatitis
• Hepatitis, Alcoholic

Intervention

Behavioral:
• Integrated AUD Treatment
IAT will include computer-delivered BI in the hospital, nurse-delivered alcohol monitoring counseling at each outpatient LT follow-up visit, and at-home participation in web-based, 7-session CBT4CBT, supplemented by tailored text messages.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine	Baltimore	Maryland

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Johns Hopkins University	National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (5)

Chander G, Hutton HE, Lau B, Xu X, McCaul ME. Brief Intervention Decreases Drinking Frequency in HIV-Infected, Heavy Drinking Women: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015 Oct 1;70(2):137-45. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000679. — View Citation

Fleming MF, Smith MJ, Oslakovic E, Lucey MR, Vue JX, Al-Saden P, Levitsky J. Phosphatidylethanol Detects Moderate-to-Heavy Alcohol Use in Liver Transplant Recipients. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2017 Apr;41(4):857-862. doi: 10.1111/acer.13353. Epub 2017 Mar 20. — View Citation

Kiluk BD, Devore KA, Buck MB, Nich C, Frankforter TL, LaPaglia DM, Yates BT, Gordon MA, Carroll KM. Randomized Trial of Computerized Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol Use Disorders: Efficacy as a Virtual Stand-Alone and Treatment Add-On Compared with Standard Outpatient Treatment. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2016 Sep;40(9):1991-2000. doi: 10.1111/acer.13162. Epub 2016 Aug 4. — View Citation

Lee BP, Chen PH, Haugen C, Hernaez R, Gurakar A, Philosophe B, Dagher N, Moore SA, Li Z, Cameron AM. Three-year Results of a Pilot Program in Early Liver Transplantation for Severe Alcoholic Hepatitis. Ann Surg. 2017 Jan;265(1):20-29. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001831. — View Citation

Weeks SR, Sun Z, McCaul ME, Zhu H, Anders RA, Philosophe B, Ottmann SE, Garonzik Wang JM, Gurakar AO, Cameron AM. Liver Transplantation for Severe Alcoholic Hepatitis, Updated Lessons from the World's Largest Series. J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Apr;226(4):549-557. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.12.044. Epub 2018 Feb 2. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Treatment engagement as assessed by proportion of kept LT follow-up appointments	Proportion of kept/scheduled LT follow-up appointments	1 year
Primary	Alcohol relapse as assessed by time to first Phosphatidyl ethanol (PEth) level = 8 ng/mL	Time to first Phosphatidyl ethanol (PEth) level = 8 ng/mL (minimum detectable level)	1 year
Primary	Post-liver transplant survival as assessed by time to death	Time to death (in months)	1 year
Secondary	Alcohol relapse as assessed by Timeline Followback Interview	Any alcohol use reported on the Timeline Followback Interview	1 year