Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT00858065 |
Other study ID # |
NIAAA-BMiller-AA015323 |
Secondary ID |
R01AA015323 |
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
April 2005 |
Est. completion date |
July 2011 |
Study information
Verified date |
September 2021 |
Source |
Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
This study explores whether giving families a choice of family-based prevention programs to
prevent adolescent alcohol use will make a difference in program recruitment, retention,
completion, as well as adolescent outcomes. Half of the families are assigned to a
traditional random control trial condition and half are assigned to a choice condition.
Further, this effectiveness study is being implemented by Kaiser Permanente Health Care
system, and explores the issues of implementing such programs within such settings.
Description:
This study examines the efficacy and effectiveness of two theory based, universal family
prevention programs that have shown efficacy for reducing adolescent alcohol and other drug
use: Family Matters (FM) (Bauman, 1996) and (Iowa) Strengthening Families Program (Spoth,
1999) when implemented with families randomly assigned to one of two different conditions: a
family "choice" condition (two-groups--FM or SFP) and a traditional random control trial
condition (three groups--FM, SFP, and control) called the "assigned" condition. The two
conditions (choice vs. assigned) are being compared for differences in: (a) adolescent
outcomes related to alcohol use and related behaviors; (b) family characteristics for those
who participate; (c) family recruitment, retention and completion rates; d) costs for program
implementation. The sample is drawn from families (N=614) with a child age 11 or 12 currently
enrolled in Kaiser Permanente Health Care Plan (KP), in one of four medical centers in
Northern California. An initial face-to-face interview was conducted (separately) with parent
and adolescent prior to program delivery, and two follow-up interviews (12 and 24 months
later) are being conducted over the telephone with parent and adolescent (separately). The
health care system represents an important new mode for delivering adolescent alcohol use
prevention programs to families. The specific aims of this project will provide a real world
test of implementation issues and feasibility. Finally, the choice condition represents an
innovative, realistic condition under which families make participation decisions outside of
the traditional experimental study design protocols. Choosing a treatment based on personal
preference may increase patient's sense of autonomy and self-efficacy for behavior change
thereby improving outcomes (Williams, 1998; Clarke, 1999). Social cognitive theory and
principles of self-regulation provide a connection between these psychological constructs and
behavioral choices/health outcomes (Bandura, 1986; Clark & Zimmerman, 1990).