Clinical Trials Logo

Adverse Event clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Adverse Event.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT04055363 Completed - Growth Clinical Trials

Human Milk Oligosaccharides (HMOs) Post-market Study on Infants

NEHMO
Start date: October 1, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs) represent the third largest solid component of breast milk. Technology advancements made it possible to supplement infant formulas with HMOs (2'FL, LNnT). Two published RCTs have demonstrated that infant formulas supplemented with 2'FL or 2'FL+LNnT are safe, well-tolerated, support normal grow, and may support healthy GI function and confer immune benefits. The performance of HMOs-supplemented formulas assessed in a real-world setting is complementary to previously conducted RCTs conducted in highly controlled clinical settings. Main objectives will be to monitor the safety & tolerance of HMOs-supplemented formulas in larger and diverse infant populations; to assess the performance of HMOs-supplemented formulas in mixed-fed infants, a population that was not studied in previous RCTs but likely represents a relatively common feeding regimen. Finally, considering the potential health/immune benefits of HMOs, it is also important explore the incidences of illnesses (i.e., respiratory illnesses, GI illnesses, and fever) associated with consuming HMOs-supplemented formulas and compare with breastfed infants data.

NCT ID: NCT03745677 Completed - Adverse Event Clinical Trials

Redesigning Systems to Improve Quality for Hospitalized Patients

RESET
Start date: June 5, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Despite recent improvements, healthcare systems are still a long way from consistently delivering high quality care to hospitalized patients. In this study, the research team is assisting hospitals in implementing a set of complementary, mutually reinforcing interventions to redesign care for hospitalized medical patients. The investigators anticipate the interventions will improve teamwork and patient outcomes and that identifiable factors and strategies will be associated with successful implementation.

NCT ID: NCT03552887 Completed - Cardiac Surgery Clinical Trials

Adverse Events During Physiotherapy at Intensive Care Unit In Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery

Adephysio
Start date: June 1, 2016
Phase:
Study type: Observational

This study aims to estimate the incidence of adverse events during physiotherapy at intensive care unit (ICU) in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery and to identify predictors of those events. This is a prospective cohort study, and the investigators observed all types of physiotherapy interventions in patients admitted at surgical ICU.

NCT ID: NCT03482232 Completed - Adverse Event Clinical Trials

Consequences of Doing What Should Not be Done in Primary Care

SOBRINA
Start date: October 14, 2018
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Retrospective observational study in a random selection of 5% of digital records active between 2014 and 2017 to quantify the frequency of Do not do primary care recommendations, calculating the over-cost related to them and study reviewing a random selection of cases previously identified to determine whether patient suffered adverse events and their over-cost.

NCT ID: NCT03332433 Completed - Gastric Cancer Clinical Trials

High-flow Nasal Cannula Oxygenation Decrease Hypoxia in Gastroscopy Sedated by Propofol

HONCHO
Start date: November 10, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Hypoxia is the most common adverse events during sedated gastroscopy. In present study, high-flow nasal cannula oxygenation will be utilized in order to reduce the hypoxia. At the same time the feasibility and safety will be evaluated.

NCT ID: NCT03116074 Completed - Adverse Event Clinical Trials

Interactive Digital Health Tools to Improve Patient Safety in Acute Care

Start date: January 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Study 1: The goal of this study is to implement and evaluate an interactive patient-centered discharge toolkit (PDTK) to engage patients and care partners in discharge preparation and communication with providers after discharge. The aims of this study are to: 1. To refine and implement an interactive PDTK on a general medicine unit that patient and caregivers can use to prepare for discharge and communicate with key providers during the transition home. 2. To evaluate the impact of the PDTK on patient activation (primary outcome). Patient reported self-efficacy after discharge; post-discharge healthcare resource utilization; and perception of patient-provider communication will be measured as secondary outcomes. 3. To identify barriers and facilitators of implementation, adoption, and use of the PDTK by patients, caregivers, and providers using qualitative and quantitative methods. Study 2: The goal of this study is to expand the use of previously developed patient safety dashboards and patient-centered discharge checklists to three general medicine units in an affiliated community hospital. The safety dashboard and interactive pre-discharge checklist are cognitive aids for clinicians and patients, respectively, that serve to facilitate early detection of patients at risk for preventable harm, including suboptimal discharge preparation. The aims of this study are to: 1. Enhance the safety dashboard and interactive pre-discharge checklist to include "smart" notifications for hospital-based clinicians when patients are at high risk for adverse events or have identified specific concerns related to discharge based on their checklist responses. 2. Expand intervention to general medical units at our community hospital-affiliate, BWFH. 3. Evaluate impact on post-discharge AEs for patients discharged from BWFH who are at risk for preventable harm and hospital readmission.

NCT ID: NCT02996201 Completed - Clinical trials for Chemotherapeutic Toxicity

Electronic Patient Reporting of Side Effects to Chemotherapy: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

Start date: November 2015
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The aim of this study is to determine whether the use of breast cancer patients' own electronic reporting of side effects to chemotherapy in a treatment setting has an impact on the handling of side effects and on the number of hospitalizations, febrile neutropenia and dose adjustments. We are using the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) for the patients' reporting of side effects.

NCT ID: NCT00461461 Completed - Clinical trials for Intensive Care Units

a Multifaceted Program for Improving Quality of Care in ICU

Start date: January 2007
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Medical errors that affect patient safety have generated huge concern since the publication of "To Err Is Human" 6 years ago [1]. Given the complexity of management in the intensive care unit (ICU) and the nature of human activities, critically ill patients are exposed to adverse events (AEs) induced by medical errors. A large number of studies have focused on AEs and medical errors in ICUs [2-6], one of their main goals being to identify strategies for preventing AEs and thereby improving patient outcomes. Choosing the best AE to serve as an indicator for the risk of medical error is challenging. In 2005, our group conducted a systematic literature review and presented the results to 30 national experts with clinical backgrounds in internal, emergency, and intensive care medicine. Using the Delphi technique, these experts selected 14 AEs that had the following characteristics: high frequency, easy and reproducible definition, association with morbidity and mortality, and ease of reporting without fear of punishment (Iatroref I study) (ref abstract). These AEs were used in a French multicenter study (75 ICUs) for a weeklong incidence evaluation (Iatroref II study) (ref abstract). Preliminary evaluation of the results allowed us to choose the following AEs for the current Iatroref III study: error in insulin administration, error in anticoagulant administration, error in anticoagulant prescription, unplanned extubation, and unplanned removal of central venous catheter. Evidence suggests that guidelines alone without reinforcing strategies may be insufficient to change provider behavior and that the most effective interventions may be multifaceted rather than single-component strategies ([7]). This study will test a composite intervention program. The objectives of the study are to determine whether the introduction of a composite intervention program decreases the predefined AEs. Study hypothesis: The intervention program will decrease the incidence of the predefined AEs.

NCT ID: NCT00309582 Completed - Adverse Event Clinical Trials

Nevirapine Levels and Fluconazole

Start date: n/a
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

Nevirapine (NVP)-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) has been commonly used in many developing countries due to its affordability and feasibility. Nonetheless, the potential drug-drug interaction between NVP and fluconazole (FLU) is a major concern. NVP can induce cytochrome P450 isoenzymes in the liver while FLU inhibit the activity of this enzyme. The recent report has demonstrated that fluconazole significantly raises plasma NVP levels and may cause serious hepatotoxicity. Conversely, NVP does not significantly influence the plasma level of FLU. However, there have not been enough data or any recommendations to adjust NVP dosage for the concurrent use of both drugs in order to avoid the adverse events. A previous study has demonstrated that genetic disposition may play a role in NVP hypersensitivity reactions. There is little data of safety and tolerability for concurrent use of NVP and FLU in Asian populations. We therefore conducted this prospective observational study to compare the trough plasma NVP levels and frequencies of adverse events among antiretroviral HIV-infected patients who did not receive FLU and received FLU in different dosages for cryptococcosis prophylaxis or treatment; and subsequently received NVP-based ART regimens.