View clinical trials related to Advanced Gastric Cancer.
Filter by:Advanced gastric cancer combined with peritoneal seeind has dismal prognosis with poor response to systemic chemotherapy and with rapid aggravation of symptoms such as abdominal pain, ileus, and poor nutritional intake. Intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy through IP port or catheter has lower complication than HIPEC (hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy) and can deliver higher dose of chemotherapy with less systemic toxicity. IP chemotherapy combined with systemic chemotehrapy showed benefit in several clinical trials, despite lack of statistical significance in phase 3 clinical trial. Proper dose/combination of chemotherapeutic agents and indication of IP chemotherapy should be investigated through prospective, large-scale clinical trials. Conversion surgery after cytotoxic chemotherapy showed improved survival in retrospective studies. Our hypothesis is that IP chemotherapy combined with systemic chemotherpay (capecitabine + oxaliplatin) would improve success rate of conversion surgery with R0 resection. In the present study, the treatment regimen consists of intraperitoneal paclitaxel combined with oxaliplatin and capecitabine (XELOX), and will be performed following surgery.
This study is an open, single infusion, cell infusion dose /method exploration study. In patients with gastric cancer and gastroesophageal cancer without effective treatment, the safety of UCB-NK cell immunotherapy was evaluated and the preliminary curative effect results were obtained.
This study is to evaluate the tolerance of albumin paclitaxel combined with apatinib and Camrelizumab in the second-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer to determine the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) of the combination.
To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of camrelizumab combined with apatinib mesylate, nab-paclitaxel and S-1
This is a Phase I/II , Open-label , Investigator-initiated Trail of Camrelizumab (an Anti-PD-1 Inhibitor), Apatinib (VEGFR2 Inhibitor) and Nab-paclitaxel as Second-line Treatment in Advanced Gastric Cancer The study was designed in two stages, the first stage was the tolerance observation stage, and the second stage was the curative effect expansion stage. The first part of the study is the Dose-finding Phase designed to establish the safety of Camrelizumab, Apatinib and Nab-paclitaxel at different dose Levels(125 mg/m2, iv. q2w, 150 mg/m2, iv. q2w, 175 mg/m2, iv. q2w or 200 mg/m2, iv. q2w). The second part of the study is the Expansion Phase designed to generate additional clinical data at specified doses . This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Camrelizumab, Apatinib and Nab-paclitaxel in the Second-line treatment of advanced Gastric Cancer.
The Purpose of This Study is to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Apafitini Combined With PD1 in Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer After Second-line Treatment Failure, Thus Providing More Options for Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer.
The efficacy and safety of the use of pembrolizumab in combination with lenvatinib.
<Research Hypothesis> The dynamics of immune systems by Olaparib and its changes by combination with immune-oncology agents will be uncovered. The combination of Olaparib with Durvalumab with paclitaxel is tolerable and efficacious in gastric cancer. <Objectives> Primary Objectives: To assess the effect of Durvalumab in combination with olaparib and paclitaxel on DCR (Disease control rate) in gastric cancer patients -Disease control rate (based on RECIST v1.1) Secondary Objective(s): - Efficacy: overall response rate (RECIST 1.1, ir response), progression-free survival, duration of response, overall survival, overall survival at 6 month, overall survival at 1 year, EORTC QLQ-C30, - Safety: toxicity (CTCAE V4.1), irAE
Gastric cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors worldwide. With the rapid aging of global population, the number of elderly patients with local advanced gastric cancer is increasing. Surgery is the essential treatment for local advanced gastric cancer. However, because of the degeneration of physiological organs, cell functions, compensatory ability, immunity, and physiological reserve ability, elderly patients often face great safety issues when having surgery. Therefore, how to treat the elderly patients with local advanced gastric cancer with safe and effective surgery is one of the important problems in the field of gastric cancer treatment. With the introduction of minimally invasive treatment concepts and techniques, the role of laparoscopic radical gastrectomy in the treatment of early gastric cancer, as well as the advantages of trauma control and postoperative accelerated rehabilitation have been confirmed, however, there is still a lack of sufficient high-level clinical evidence in the elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer. The current study therefore aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer in elderly patients, using a randomized parallel controlled study design. The investigators hypothesized that laparoscopic gastrectomy is superior to open gastrectomy in terms of perioperative safety for local advanced gastric cancer patients aged 70 and above.
This is a phase II Randomized comparison clinical trial of activated CIK armed with anti-CD3-MUC1 bispecific antibody for advanced gastric cancer. And the aim of this research is to study the clinical efficacy and safety of activated CIK armed with anti-CD3-MUC1 bispecific antibody for gastric cancer.