View clinical trials related to Advanced Breast Cancer.
Filter by:This is a study of an experimental drug (neratinib) versus a combination of drugs (lapatinib and capecitabine) in women who have erbB-2 (HER-2) positive metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer. The goal of this study is to compare the two regimens in shrinking tumors and extending the lives of women with erbB2 (HER2) positive breast cancer. The study will also compare the safety of the two regimens and to compare quality of life of patients taking the two regimens.
The purpose of this study is to find out what effect the combination of fulvestrant (Faslodex) and dasatinib (Sprycel) has on advanced breast cancer compared to fulvestrant alone.
The purpose of this study is to determine the safety profile, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), of oral vorinostat in combination with oral capecitabine given on days 1-7 and 15-21 of a 28 day cycle in patients with advanced breast cancer, using RECIST criteria. This study was originally intended to be a phase 1/phase 2. The protocol was amended to make this study a phase 1 only.
Docetaxol plus capecitabine regimen is the standard treatment for the anthracycline-pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer. Cisplatin is an important drug for advanced breast cancer and potential effective drug for triple negative breast cancer.The study primary objective:Assess ORR,TTP,TTF and 2 year PFS rate between docetaxol+capecitabine and docetaxol+cisplatin. The second objective:Assess the safety and QOL.
The main purpose of this study is to compare the effect of 2 doses of FASLODEX with 1 dose of ARIMIDEX in terms of time to tumor progression in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.
To evaluate Arimidex 6 month therapy as an adjuvant treatment in postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer in whom a partial or complete response or stabilized disease were obtained with first line chemotherapy, by tumoral response assessment.
The primary goal of therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer is palliation and prolongation of life with quality. Although there are no randomized trials comparing chemotherapy with supportive care in women with metastatic breast cancer, chemotherapy clearly provides a survival benefit in metastatic breast cancer. Due to diagnosis at earlier phases of metastatic disease and more effective therapies, the median survival of patients treated with modern taxane-based chemotherapy is now reaching approximately 2 years. The duration of chemotherapy in patients responding or stable disease remains controversial, since quality of life is not usually adversely affected and may even be improved in many patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy. In addition, many commonly used chemotherapeutic agents are not limited by cumulative toxicity in metastatic breast cancer patients. Several studies investigated the role of maintenance chemotherapy suggest that maintenance chemotherapy is associated with superior time to progression but no survival gain. However, these randomized trials did not incorporate taxane-based chemotherapeutic regimens, the new standard of care in metastatic breast cancer patients these days. A 1998 metaanalysis of 1,986 patients randomly assigned between combination chemotherapy and single-agent therapy in metastatic breast cancer patients demonstrated a survival advantage to combination chemotherapy, with a hazard ratio of 0.82 (range, 0.75 to 0.90). Although there are several randomized trials showing negative results for survival gain in patients who received maintenance chemotherapy, the role of maintenance chemotherapy with newer agents, such as docetaxel or paclitaxel, have not been established yet. Although Italian MANTA trial demonstrated no difference in PFS or survival between the two arms, their metaanalysis advocated survival benefit of maintenance therapy. Since gemcitabine/paclitaxel (GP) combination chemotherapy is one of the two regimens which showed definite survival gain with favorable toxicity from a randomized trial, we plan to randomize patients who responded to six cycles of GP induction chemotherapy to receive additional maintenance GP chemotherapy until disease progression versus observation. We hypothesize that patients who receive maintenance GP chemotherapy will do better in terms of progression free survival.
The purpose of this study is to find out if dasatinib will safely reduce the size or spread of your tumor.
This study has the purpose to demonstrate clinical efficacy of the investigational new drug ertumaxomab in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2/neu) overexpressing (3+ or 2+ with a positive Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) test result) metastatic breast cancer progressing after trastuzumab treatment. Ertumaxomab is a trifunctional bispecific antibody targeting Her-2/neu on tumor cells and CD3 on T cells. Trifunctional antibodies represent a new concept for targeted anticancer therapy. This new antibody class has the capability to redirect T cells and accessory immune effector cells (e.g. macrophages, dendritic cells [DCs] and natural killer [NK] cells) to the tumor site. According to preclinical data, trifunctional antibodies activate these immune cells, which can trigger a complex anti-tumor immune response.
Subjects with advanced or metastatic (spread to other parts of the body) breast cancer that is HER2/neu-positive will take part in this study. This type of breast cancer has a high amount of a protein called HER2. HER2 is part of a family of receptors found on both cancer and normal cells. This family of receptors is important for cell growth and is found in many tumor types. The purpose of this research study is to compare an approved treatment for breast cancer capecitabine, also called Xeloda®, to the combination of capecitabine plus an experimental drug, lapatinib also known as Tykerb®, for treatment of advanced or metastatic breast cancer that is HER2/neu-positive.Capecitabine is an approved type of chemotherapy used to treat certain cancers including breast cancer. Capecitabine fights cancer by interfering with the ability of cells to divide and tumor growth. Lapatinib (Tykerb®) is considered "investigational", which means the drug has not been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for sale as a prescription or over-the-counter medication. Lapatinib may slow or stop cancer cells from growing by inhibiting the growth of cancer cells. However, this theory has not been proven. The addition of the study drug (lapatinib) to capecitabine may help stop cancer cells as well as or better than capecitabine alone. Other studies have demonstrated activity and tolerability of lapatinib either alone or in combination with capecitabine in the treatment of breast cancer.Subjects will receive capecitabine and lapatinib. A treatment period will be 21 days long. This period is known as a "cycle". All medications will be given by mouth. Subjects will take capecitabine for 2 weeks straight (Day 1-14) followed by a 1 week without capecitabine (Day 15-21). Doses of lapatinib will be taken daily continuously for 21 days (Day 1-Day 21) which means that subjects will still take lapatinib on the week that they do not take capecitabine (Day 15-21). Subjects will continue to receive these medications unless they experience severe, serious and/or excessive side effects, the cancer becomes worse, the subjects wishes to no longer participate or the study doctor feels it is not in the best interest to continue treatment.Tests and procedures such as physical exam, blood tests, CT or MRI, ECG, ECHO and/or MUGA tests will be conducted at one or more of the following time points: before the study starts, before each cycle, every 6 and 12 weeks, and after the last dose of capecitabine/lapatinib treatment.