View clinical trials related to ADHD.
Filter by:Background: TEAMS (Training Executive Attention and Motor Skills) is a non-pharmacological, neurocognitive intervention program targeted preschool children with ADHD developed by Professor Jeffrey Halperin, and his team from New York University. The uniqueness of this program lies in the concept, based on stimulating neurocognitive growth through focused physical activity and play (Halperin et al.; 2011, 2012, in press). Teams hypotheses: TEAMS is based on the notions that: 1. The behavioural manifestations of ADHD are the result of deficient neural networks that affect a wide array of neurocognitive and behavioural processes which are not necessarily identical in all children with the disorder. 2. Neurodevelopment is sensitive to and can be positively affected by appropriate environmental influences. 3. Effective environmental stimulation will be best achieved within a social context. 4. The engagement of the child in the core activities of the treatment must be intrinsically rewarding (i.e., fun) in order to facilitate compliance of the intervention. The initial research by Halperin et al. (2012)indicated significant improvement in ADHD severity from pre- to post-treatment, which also persisted 3 months later. Objective: The aim of this study is, through a randomized controlled trial (RCT), to validate the TEAMS treatment program in a clinical setting in Denmark. Method: Pre-school children age 3-6, from Region Zealand in Denmark, diagnosed with ADHD as primary diagnosis are offered participation in the RCT study of the TEAMS program. The control groups receive the standard treatment program, outlined by the clinical guidelines of Region Zealand. The intervention groups participate in eight weekly group sessions consisting of separate parent- and children's groups. In the child group the children are introduced to games that are designed to enhance inhibitory control, working memory, attention, visuospatial abilities, planning, and motor skills. The parent group consists of psychoeducation and instructions in how to encourage playing these games with their children and how to support the child's development.
Neurofeedback has proved to be effective in treating Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in experimental settings. This study investigates whether neurofeedback can be used as a therapeutic intervention in regular outpatient care. The investigators compare high frequent neurofeedback with high frequent self-management therapy and suppose that both result in comparable effects.
This is a multicenter, multiple dose, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, forced titration study. Patients will be randomized to 1 of 4 treatment groups in a 1:1:1:1 ratio. One-hundred twenty (120) patients are planned to be randomized. Each patient will receive AR08 (0.5, 1, or 2 mg per day) or matching placebo for seven (7) weeks.
The primary aim of this study is to assess the predictability of treatment response to stimulants in adults with ADHD using functional magnetic resonance This study will be a six-week, open-label study including adults ranging from age 18-55 with ADHD.
Multicenter, Prospective, randomized, comparative and controlled study about the beneficial effects in behavior and brain connectivity of different dietary patterns in 100 children with ADHD between 7 and 12 years, followed up for 3 months of nutritional therapy.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of neurofeedback training (NFB) on objective measurements of attention in young adults with ADHD. The secondary objectives are to evaluate neurofeedback effects on self-report measures of attention, ADHD symptoms, and to identify electroencephalogram (EEG) markers of ADHD and neurofeedback efficacy. The study is a double-blind, placebo controlled clinical trial to test the efficacy and safety of EEG neurofeedback in individuals 18-40 years of age with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Attention will be evaluated at baseline, after 12 and 24 training sessions (an average of 4 and 8 weeks, respectively), and 4 weeks after the last neurofeedback session. The primary outcome will be change from baseline on the Attention Performance Index (API) variable of the Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA) a standardized, well-normed, computerized test of attention, after 12 neurofeedback or sham training sessions (and average of 4 weeks). Secondary outcomes will be change from baseline on other TOVA variables after 12 and 24 sessions (an average of 4 and 8 weeks, respectively), at 4 weeks post-training follow-up, and changes from baseline at each time point on the Adult Self Report Scale (ASRS) and Mindful Awareness and Attention Scale (MAAS). EEG data collected during TOVA attention testing at baseline will be used to model EEG differences between ADHD and non-ADHD participants. Additional EEG data collected during the TOVA at midpoint (average of 4 weeks), after 24 NFB sessions (average of 8 weeks), and 4 weeks post-NFB will be used to develop statistical models to use as indicators of neurofeedback efficacy
This is a 12-week clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of memantine hydrochloride (Memantine HC1, brand name Namenda) in the treatment of executive function deficits (EFDs) in adults with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). After screening procedures, memantine is prescribed in randomized, double-blind fashion (equal chance of medication or placebo) for 12 weeks. The investigators hypothesize that memantine hydrochloride will prove to be an effective, safe, and well-tolerated agent for the treatment of EFDs in individuals with ADHD interested in non-stimulant medications.
The Attention Deficit Disorder with or without Hyperactivity (ADHD) is one of the most frequently found disorder in children. It is characterized by a triad of symptoms involving attention deficit, hyperactivity and impulsivity and having an impact on the functioning of the subject especially in terms of learning. Currently, main interventions to treat ADHD in children are stimulant medication or supportive psychotherapy. Data from recent studies highlight the use of stimulant drugs (amphetamine derivatives such as methylphenidate) to treat the core symptoms of ADHD children. These drugs are generally effective but their nature (psychostimulants) and adverse effects they cause (appetite suppression, sleep disturbances, headaches, motor tics, abdominal pain, irritability, nausea and fatigue) encourage the development of new therapeutic approaches. The use of supportive psychotherapy alone would have limited effect on symptoms of children with ADHD. Our aim is to test the use a cognitive remediation program using a virtual classroom in children suffering from ADHD.
The overall goal of the proposed research is to evaluate the behavioral and genetic mechanisms of smoking risk in non-smoking young adults (aged 18-25 years of age) with and without ADHD using a novel laboratory-based model of intranasal nicotine administration. Study Hypotheses: 1. that nicotine will produce greater positive and fewer negative/aversive subjective effects in individuals with ADHD. The study team also hypothesizes that nicotine will improve performance to a greater degree in those with ADHD. 2. that individuals in the ADHD group will exhibit an increase in choices for nicotine vs. placebo in both conditions (i.e., main effect) and that this effect will be more pronounced in the High Demand vs. Low Demand conditions (i.e. Group x Condition interaction). Also that greater performance enhancing effects of nicotine will be associated with greater nicotine choice during the high demand cognitive condition. 3. that the main effects of ADHD status on nicotine reinforcement will be heightened in the presence of certain genotypes. Also that the main effects of ADHD status on nicotine reinforcement will be heightened in the presence of certain genotypes. Finally that exposure to nicotine will alter epigenetic patterns in DNA
The purpose of this study is to examine whether an integrative group-based intervention will help children experiencing psychological and physical distress. Children, ages 10 to 12, will be recruited for participation in this therapeutic group. Eligible and consenting participants will be randomized to a wait-list control group or the group intervention. The group intervention will take place over a 12-week period, during which participants will attend a weekly coping skills group that integrates yoga-based practices (such as yoga poses, mindfulness, self-acceptance, breath work) with cognitive-behavioral principles (such as increasing awareness of thoughts and emotions).