View clinical trials related to Acute Respiratory Failure.
Filter by:This study evaluates a pharmacological intervention to relieve dyspnea in intensive care unit patients. Indeed, opioids can be particularly beneficial since 1) dyspnea and pain share many similarities, 2) the benefit of opioids on dyspnea has been clearly demonstrated in other populations. However, to date, data regarding the impact of morphine on dyspnea in intensive care unit patients admitted for acute respiratory failure are scarce. There may be a reluctance of physicians to prescribe opioids that is not scientifically justified. The study will focus on patient reported outcome (PRO) criteria. The ultimate goal of this pilot study is to design the protocol of a future pragmatic trial.
The purpose of this national, multicenter service review is to determine and compare ventilation management in COVID-19 patients in the Netherlands, and to determine whether certain ventilation settings have an independent association with duration of ventilation. In every adult invasively ventilated COVID-19 patient from a participating ICU, granular ventilator settings and parameters will be collected from start of invasive ventilation for up to 72 hours. Follow up is until ICU and hospital discharge, and until day 90. The primary outcome includes main ventilator settings (including tidal volume, airway pressures, oxygen fraction and respiratory rate). Secondary endpoints are ventilator-free days and alive at day 28 (VFD-28); duration of mechanical ventilation; use of prone positioning and recruitment maneuvers; duration of ICU and hospital stay; incidence of kidney injury; and ICU, hospital, 28-day and 90-day mortality.
Hypercapnia is a frequent clinical situation defined as an elevation of the partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) above 45 mmHg. Several physiopathological parameters such as respiratory minute volume, dead space volume or CO2 production influence the PaCO2. Therefore, hypercapnia can affect the time of various diseases. Available epidemiological data regarding hypercapnia are from studies investigating the efficacy of non-invasive ventilation (NIV), with different population cohorts. However, their interpretation must be cautious given the heterogeneity in patient case-mix and results. Then, whether hypercapnia is a common reason for intensive care unit (ICU) admission, epidemiological data is scarce and heterogeneous. The aim of this study is to investigate the epidemiological, clinical determinants and outcomes of patients admitted to ICU with hypercapnic respiratory failure.
Acute respiratory failure is one of the most common diagnosis in patients admitted in the Emergency Department. Acute respiratory failure is associated with morbidity and mortality. Fifteen percent of patient will require ventilatory support and among them 40% will die. Measurement of diaphragmatic motion (excursion) at ultrasonography is a noninvasive measure, allowing to assess diaphragm dysfunction. It could be useful in predicting poor prognosis in ED patients with respiratory failure . In this study the investigators will compare the prognostic value of diaphragmatic excursion measurement at ultrasonography to that of the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) 2 in patients presenting with acute respiratory failure in the ED The Investigators made the hypothesis that measurement of diaphragmatic excursion in ED patients with acute respiratory failure could be of value in predicting the need for ventilatory support or mortality within 28 days from ED admission
This study evaluates a novel arm restraint compared with traditional soft wrist restraints in older critically ill patients. The primary outcome is upper extremity mobility measured by actigraphy, and secondary outcomes include sedation, agitation, satisfaction, and acceptability.
This study will pilot test three strategies designed to speed implementation of preventive post-extubation noninvasive ventilation (NIV): one control strategy (traditional online continuing medical education) and two novel strategies (interprofessional education and just-in-time education).
The execution of diagnostic-therapeutic investigations by bronchial endoscopy can expose the patient to acute respiratory failure (ARF). In particular, the risk of hypoxemia is greater during broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL). For this reason, oxygen therapy is administered at low or high flows during the course of bronchoscopic procedures, in order to avoid hypoxemia. Few clinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of high flow oxygen through nasal cannula (HFNC) during BAL procedures, and no study has evaluated, during bronchial endoscopy, the effects of HFNC on diaphragmatic effort (assessed with ultrasound) and aeration and ventilation of the different lung regions (assessed with electrical impedance tomography). Therefore, investigators conceived the present randomized controlled study to evaluate possible differences existing during bronchoscopy between oxygen therapy administered with HFNC and conventional (low-flow) oxygen therapy, delivered through nasal cannula.
Clinical reasoning and recent data suggest that early use of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in refractory respiratory failure may confer a survival advantage. This retrospective matched study will assess whether patients who received VV ECMO at less severe hypoxaemia had differing outcomes to those who received ECMO with very severe hypoxaemia.
This is an observational study of outcomes of the NHS England-commissioned national respiratory ECMO service, which has been active at six centres since December 2011. The primary outcome of interest is the number of patients who survive to ICU discharge at the ECMO centre. The study also aims to identify factors predictive of outcome.
Many patients in intensive care units (ICUs) rely on family members or surrogates to make medical decisions on their behalf. One of the recommended ways to improve a surrogate's experience is to invite him or her to participate in daily, multidisciplinary ICU rounds. In practice, this is often a challenging way for clinicians to engage with the patient's surrogates. Surrogates of non-decisional ICU patients will be randomized to receive a written rounding summary every day or every other day that the patient is in the ICU. The summary will be organized as follows for each of the most important ICU problems: 1) Description of the problem, 2) Ways the ICU team is addressing the problem i.e. consultations, diagnostic tests, and treatments. 3) An assessment of whether the problem is improving or worsening. The investigators hypothesize that surrogates who receive written rounding summaries will be more satisfied with ICU care than surrogates who receive usual care. Satisfaction will be measured by the Critical Care Family Needs Inventory (CCFNI) questionnaire.