Acute Myeloid Leukemia Clinical Trial
Official title:
Evaluating in Vivo AZA Incorporation in Mononuclear Cells Following Vidaza or CC486
Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) is a group of blood disorders where the bone marrow does not produce enough mature red blood cells, white blood cells and platelets. In a healthy person, the bone marrow makes blood stem cells (immature cells, also called 'blasts') that become mature blood cells over time. In people with MDS, this process is affected and immature blood cells in the bone marrow do not mature fully to become healthy blood cells. This causes a lack of healthy blood cells that can function properly. With fewer healthy blood cells, infection, anaemia, or easy bleeding may occur. MDS can progress to acute myeloid leukaemia in 25-30% of patients, and if untreated it can be rapidly fatal. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the standard treatment, azacitidine (Vidaza) given as an injection under the skin compared to the same medication (called CC-486) taken as a tablet by mouth. Vidaza is approved by the Australian Therapeutics Goods Administration (TGA) as standard treatment for MDS. CC-486 is an experimental treatment. This means it is not an approved treatment for MDS in Australia. CC-486 is being developed to increase convenience and make it easier for patients to continue their treatment. So far it has been given to over 870 patients in studies across the world. The treatment in the injection and the tablet is the same. Studies like this one are being done to ensure the tablet works in the same way as the standard injected treatment. Vidaza is given by subcutaneous injection (ie under the skin) over an hour for 7 days every 4 weeks for as long as it continues to work. All study participants will receive active treatment (there is no placebo), and all participants will receive the standard injection for six treatment cycles followed by the new tablet medication taken once daily for 21 days every 4 weeks. This allows the researchers to compare the two ways of giving the medicine.
MDS is an insidious and largely incurable haematological malignancy that increasingly impacts on the well-being of our ageing population, and one for which there has been no significant therapeutic advance since the introduction of injectable AZA (Vidaza®) over a decade ago. Furthermore, the basis for the effectiveness of Vidaza® or lack thereof is not known and attempts at identifying genes that are reactivated and induce HSC differentiation have generally been unrewarding. It is also unclear whether these drugs work by inducing cellular differentiation or triggering apoptosis of the abnormal clone by activating permissive gene transcription. Recently developed assays permit genome-wide mutation analysis and assessment of gene expression and methylation at gene regulatory regions. Combined with functional studies, these assays are powerful tools that could help identify why some patients respond and others don't and why patients relapse after initial response. They can also help provide molecular insights into specific genes or pathways that could be manipulated to overcome primary or secondary drug resistance to AZA. Following the evaluation CC-486 safety in Phase 1 studies, a Phase 2, international, multicentre, randomized, open-label, parallel group study was launched and is currently recruiting to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CC-486 alone and in combination with durvalumab in participants with MDS who fail to achieve objective response to treatment with Vidaza®. However, at present there is no objective method of correlating clinical or molecular response with actual drug incorporation due to the lack of a robust assay to measure AZA incorporation in vivo. This gap has now been filled by the recent development of a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) based assay that is effective in measuring AZA pharmacokinetics in vivo; "AZA-MS: a novel mass spectrometry method to determine the intracellular pharmacokinetics of AZA therapy in vivo" (Unnikrishnan et al Leukemia 2017) and we will for the first time be able to directly compare Vidaza® incorporation with CC486 incorporation in the same patient and measuring clinical and molecular response after six cycles of the former followed by six cycles of the latter. The primary objective of the trial is to determine whether there is greater AZA incorporation in DNA in blood progenitors following 21 days of CC486 than there is with 7 days of Vidaza® in a 28- day treatment cycle and whether incorporation is associated with greater clinical and/or molecular response. The secondary objectives of the trial are based on outcomes from a compassionate access program conducted in NSW, Australia from 2008-09. MDS, MDS/AML and CMML patients who respond to Vidaza® were found to have a greater fraction of hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) progressing through the cell cycle than patients who fail to respond to AZA (Unnikrishnan et al 2017). What is not known is whether increased replication is associated with increased AZA incorporation. The availability of an assay (AZA-MS) to measure AZA incorporation, and the ability to measure the fraction of replicative HPCs, forms the basis of the secondary objectives of this study. When applying the AZA-MS assay to samples collected from the compassionate access program, we also noted that AZA non-responders either do not incorporate AZA derivatives in DNA following Vidaza® or do incorporate AZA to levels comparable to that of responders yet still fail to respond (Unnikrishnan et al Leukemia 2017). Mechanisms of pharmacologically overcoming resistance would be quite different in the two instances. Longitudinal measurements of derivative AZA incorporation in DNA can now be combined with assays to evaluate whether patients who do not respond despite adequate drug uptake fail to activate downstream processes such as interferon/immune pathway activation or display check-point inhibition. This study will provide data to support individualised alternatives to optimise future AZA therapy. ;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT05400122 -
Natural Killer (NK) Cells in Combination With Interleukin-2 (IL-2) and Transforming Growth Factor Beta (TGFbeta) Receptor I Inhibitor Vactosertib in Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04460235 -
Immunogenicity of an Anti-pneumococcal Combined Vaccination in Acute Leukemia or Lymphoma
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT03678493 -
A Study of FMT in Patients With AML Allo HSCT in Recipients
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04022785 -
PLX51107 and Azacitidine in Treating Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05424562 -
A Study to Assess Change in Disease State in Adult Participants With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Ineligible for Intensive Chemotherapy Receiving Oral Venetoclax Tablets in Canada
|
||
Completed |
NCT03197714 -
Clinical Trial of OPB-111077 in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukaemia
|
Phase 1 | |
Terminated |
NCT03224819 -
Study of Emerfetamab (AMG 673) in Adults With Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
|
Early Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04070768 -
Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin (GO) and Venetoclax in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory CD33+ Acute Myeloid Leukemia:Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium BTCRC-AML17-113
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03844048 -
An Extension Study of Venetoclax for Subjects Who Have Completed a Prior Venetoclax Clinical Trial
|
Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04107727 -
Trial to Compare Efficacy and Safety of Chemotherapy/Quizartinib vs Chemotherapy/Placebo in Adults FMS-like Tyrosine Kinase 3 (FLT3) Wild-type Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04385290 -
Combination of Midostaurin and Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin in First-line Standard Therapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (MOSAIC)
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04920500 -
Bioequivalence of Daunorubicin Cytarabine Liposomes in Naive AML Patients
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03897127 -
Study of Standard Intensive Chemotherapy Versus Intensive Chemotherapy With CPX-351 in Adult Patients With Newly Diagnosed AML and Intermediate- or Adverse Genetics
|
Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04021368 -
RVU120 in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia or High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03665480 -
The Effect of G-CSF on MRD After Induction Therapy in Newly Diagnosed AML
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02485535 -
Selinexor in Treating Patients With Intermediate- and High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia or High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome After Transplant
|
Phase 1 | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT04093570 -
A Study for Participants Who Participated in Prior Clinical Studies of ASTX727 (Standard Dose), With a Food Effect Substudy at Select Study Centers
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04069208 -
IA14 Induction in Young Acute Myeloid Leukemia
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05744739 -
Tomivosertib in Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04969601 -
Anti-Covid-19 Vaccine in Children With Acute Leukemia and Their Siblings
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 |