Acute Myeloid Leukemia Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Phase 1 First-In-Human Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Efficacy of AMG 673 Administered as Short Term Intravenous Infusions in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Verified date | October 2022 |
Source | Amgen |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The primary objectives of this study are to evaluate the safety and tolerability of emerfetamab in adults with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and to estimate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or a biologically active dose (eg, recommended phase 2 dose [RP2D]).
Status | Terminated |
Enrollment | 46 |
Est. completion date | December 28, 2020 |
Est. primary completion date | December 28, 2020 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria - Subject has provided informed consent prior to initiation of any study-specific activities/procedures. - Subjects = 18 years of age at the time of signing consent. - AML as defined by the World Health Organisation (WHO) Classification persisting or recurring following 1 or more treatment courses except promyelocytic leukemia (APML). - More than 5% myeloblasts in bone marrow. - Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of = 2. Exclusion Criteria - Known hypersensitivity to immunoglobulins. - Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) within 6 weeks prior to start of AMG 673 treatment. - Allogeneic HSCT within 3 months prior to start of AMG 673 treatment. - Non-manageable graft versus host disease. - Known positive test for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). - Males and females of reproductive potential who are unwilling to practice a highly effective method(s) of birth control while on study through 15 weeks after receiving the last dose of study drug. Acceptable methods of highly effective birth control include sexual abstinence (males, females); vasectomy; bilateral tubal ligation/occlusion; or a condom with spermicide (men) in combination with hormonal birth control or intrauterine device (IUD) (women). Males who are unwilling to abstain from sperm donation while on study through 5 half-lives after receiving the (last [multiple-dose studies]) dose of study drug. - Females who are lactating/breastfeeding or who plan to breastfeed while on study through 15 weeks after receiving the last dose of study drug. - Females with a positive pregnancy test - Females planning to become pregnant while on study through 15 weeks after receiving the last dose of study drug. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Australia | The Alfred Hospital | Melbourne | Victoria |
Australia | The Royal Melbourne Hospital | Parkville | Victoria |
Germany | Klinikum der Ludwig Maximilians Univeritaet | München | |
United States | University of Alabama at Birmingham | Birmingham | Alabama |
United States | City of Hope National Medical Center | Duarte | California |
United States | University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center | Houston | Texas |
United States | University of Washington | Seattle | Washington |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Amgen |
United States, Australia, Germany,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events | The severity of each adverse event (AE) was graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 criteria, where Grade 1 = mild AE, Grade 2 = moderate AE, Grade 3 = severe AE, Grade 4 = life-threatening and Grade 5 = death due to AE.
A serious adverse event is defined as an adverse event that meets at least 1 of the following serious criteria: fatal life threatening required in patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity congenital anomaly/birth defect other medically important serious event. |
From first dose of study drug until the end of study; median (minimum, maximum) duration was 1.22 (0.10, 5.98) months. | |
Primary | Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLT) | A DLT was defined as any of the events described below occurring in a participant during the DLT window, unless clearly attributable to causes other than emerfetamab:
Any treatment-related death; Grade 4 neutropenia persisting at 42 days after the last infusion in treatment cycle 1; Grade 3-5 non-hematologic toxicity not clearly resulting from the underlying leukemia with a few protocol-specified exceptions; Grade 2 or 3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) meeting any of the criteria listed below: Grade 2 CRS that does not resolve, with or without intervention to Grade 1 within 7 days; Grade 3 CRS that does not resolve, with or without intervention to Grade 2 within 5 days, or grade 1 within 7 days; Grade 3 CRS reported at the initial dose; Two separate grade 3 CRS events; Grade 4 CRS occurring during treatment. |
Schedule A: From the start of the first infusion on day 1 until day 14. Schedule B: From the start of the first infusion on day 1 to day 28. | |
Secondary | Schedule A: Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Emerfetamab | Serum concentrations of emerfetamab were determined using a validated assay. Noncompartmental analysis was performed for estimation of pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters. Concentrations below the lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ; 0.0015 ng/mL) were set to zero before data analysis. | Cycle 1 day 1 at predose and at 1, 6, 24, and 48 hours after the start of infusion, and day 5 at predose and 1, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 312 hours after the start of infusion. | |
Secondary | Schedule A: Time to Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of Emerfetamab | Serum concentrations of emerfetamab were determined using a validated assay. Noncompartmental analysis was performed for estimation of PK parameters. Concentrations below the LLOQ (0.0015 ng/mL) were set to zero before data analysis. | Cycle 1 day 1 at predose and at 1, 6, 24, and 48 hours after the start of infusion, and day 5 at predose and 1, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 312 hours after the start of infusion. | |
Secondary | Schedule A: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 96 Hours Post-dose (AUC0-96) on Day 1 for Emerfetamab | Serum concentrations of emerfetamab were determined using a validated assay. Noncompartmental analysis was performed for estimation of PK parameters. Concentrations below the LLOQ (0.0015 ng/mL) were set to zero before data analysis.
The area under the curve (AUC) from time zero to 96 hours postdose was calculated using the linear trapezoidal method. |
Cycle 1 day 1 at predose and at 1, 6, 24, 48, and 96 hours after the start of infusion. | |
Secondary | Schedule A: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) for Emerfetamab | Serum concentrations of emerfetamab were determined using a validated assay. Non-compartmental analysis was performed for estimation of PK parameters. Concentrations below the LLOQ (0.0015 ng/mL) were set to zero before data analysis.
The area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 relative to the start of the IV infusion to the last quantifiable concentration was estimated using the linear trapezoidal method. |
Cycle 1 day 5 at predose and 1, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 312 hours after the start of infusion. | |
Secondary | Schedule A: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUCinf) for Emerfetamab | Serum concentrations of emerfetamab were determined using a validated assay. Non-compartmental analysis was performed for estimation of PK parameters. Concentrations below the LLOQ (0.0015 ng/mL) were set to zero before data analysis.
The area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 relative to the start of the IV infusion to infinity was estimated using the linear trapezoidal method. |
Cycle 1 day 5 at predose and 1, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 312 hours after the start of infusion. | |
Secondary | Schedule A: AUC Total for Emerfetamab | Serum concentrations of emerfetamab were determined using a validated assay. Non-compartmental analysis was performed for estimation of PK parameters. Concentrations below the LLOQ (0.0015 ng/mL) were set to zero before data analysis.
The AUC total was calculated as the sum of AUC0-96hr following the Day 1 dose and AUCinf following the Day 5 dose. |
Cycle 1 day 1 at predose and at 1, 6, 24, and 48 hours after the start of infusion, and day 5 at predose and 1, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 312 hours after the start of infusion. | |
Secondary | Schedule A: Terminal Half-life (T1/2,z) of Emerfetamab | Serum concentrations of emerfetamab were determined using a validated assay. Non-compartmental analysis was performed for estimation of PK parameters. Concentrations below the LLOQ (0.0015 ng/mL) were set to zero before data analysis.
Terminal half-life (t1/2,z) was calculated as t1/2,z = ln(2)/?z, where ?z is the first-order terminal rate constant estimated via linear regression of the terminal log-linear phase. |
Cycle 1 day 5 at predose and 1, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 312 hours after the start of infusion. | |
Secondary | Schedule A: Clearance (CL) of Emerfetamab | Serum concentrations of emerfetamab were determined using a validated assay. Non-compartmental analysis was performed for estimation of PK parameters. Concentrations below the LLOQ (0.0015 ng/mL) were set to zero before data analysis.
Clearance was calculated as Dose/?z*AUCinf. |
Cycle 1 day 5 at predose and 1, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 312 hours after the start of infusion. | |
Secondary | Schedule B: Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Emerfetamab | Serum concentrations of emerfetamab were determined using a validated assay. Noncompartmental analysis was performed for estimation of PK parameters. Concentrations below the LLOQ (0.0015 ng/mL) were set to zero before data analysis. | Cycle 1 day 14 at predose and 1, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours after the start of infusion. | |
Secondary | Schedule B: Time to Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of Emerfetamab | Serum concentrations of emerfetamab were determined using a validated assay. Noncompartmental analysis was performed for estimation of PK parameters. Concentrations below the LLOQ (0.0015 ng/mL) were set to zero before data analysis. | Cycle 1 day 14 at predose and 1, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours after the start of infusion. | |
Secondary | Schedule B: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) for Emerfetamab | Serum concentrations of emerfetamab were determined using a validated assay. Noncompartmental analysis was performed for estimation of PK parameters. Concentrations below the LLOQ (0.0015 ng/mL) were set to zero before data analysis.
The area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 relative to the start of the IV infusion to the last quantifiable concentration was estimated using the linear trapezoidal method. |
Cycle 1 day 14 at predose and 1, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours after the start of infusion. | |
Secondary | Schedule B: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUCinf) for Emerfetamab | Serum concentrations of emerfetamab were determined using a validated assay. Noncompartmental analysis was performed for estimation of PK parameters. Concentrations below the LLOQ (0.0015 ng/mL) were set to zero before data analysis.
The area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 relative to the start of the IV infusion to infinity was estimated using the linear trapezoidal method. |
Cycle 1 day 14 at predose and 1, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours after the start of infusion. | |
Secondary | Schedule B: Terminal Half-life (T1/2,z) of Emerfetamab | Serum concentrations of emerfetamab were determined using a validated assay. Noncompartmental analysis was performed for estimation of PK parameters. Concentrations below the LLOQ (0.0015 ng/mL) were set to zero before data analysis. | Cycle 1 day 14 at predose and 1, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours after the start of infusion. | |
Secondary | Schedule B: Clearance of Emerfetamab | Serum concentrations of emerfetamab were determined using a validated assay. Noncompartmental analysis was performed for estimation of PK parameters. Concentrations below the LLOQ (0.0015 ng/mL) were set to zero before data analysis. | Cycle 1 day 14 at predose and 1, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours after the start of infusion. | |
Secondary | Response Rate | Disease response was based upon review of cytogenetics, bone marrow (BM) aspirates/biopsies, and peripheral blood count. Response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of complete remission (CR), CR with incomplete recovery (CRi) or morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS) according to Revised International Working Group (IWG) response criteria, or CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh*).
CR: BM blasts < 5%; absence of blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > 1.0 x 10^9/L; platelet count > 100 x 10^9/L; independence of red cell transfusions. CRi: All CR criteria except residual neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. MLFS: BM blasts < 5%; absence of blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; no hematologic recovery required. CRh*: < 5% blasts in BM; no evidence of disease; partial recovery of peripheral blood counts: platelets > 50,000/µl, and ANC > 500/µl; no extramedullary disease. |
Disease response was assessed on day 14 of every treatment cycle and at the end of study; median (min, max) duration was 1.22 (0.10, 5.98) months. | |
Secondary | Duration of Response | Duration of response is defined as the interval from the date of the first disease assessment indicating an overall response to the first documented relapse or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. | Disease response was assessed on day 14 of every treatment cycle and at the end of study; median (min, max) duration was 1.22 (0.10, 5.98) months. | |
Secondary | Time to Response | Time to response is defined as the interval from the first administration of study drug to the first documentation of response. Time to response was evaluated only for participants who achieved a response. | Disease response was assessed on day 14 of every treatment cycle and at the end of study; median (min, max) duration was 1.22 (0.10, 5.98) months. | |
Secondary | Time to Progression | Time to progression (event-free survival) is defined as the interval from first administration of study drug to the earliest of date of treatment failure, relapse for responders, or death due to any cause. For non-responders, the event date for treatment failure was assigned as the date of first administration of study drug. | Disease response was assessed on day 14 of every treatment cycle and at the end of study; median (min, max) duration was 1.22 (0.10, 5.98) months. |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT05400122 -
Natural Killer (NK) Cells in Combination With Interleukin-2 (IL-2) and Transforming Growth Factor Beta (TGFbeta) Receptor I Inhibitor Vactosertib in Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04460235 -
Immunogenicity of an Anti-pneumococcal Combined Vaccination in Acute Leukemia or Lymphoma
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT04022785 -
PLX51107 and Azacitidine in Treating Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT03678493 -
A Study of FMT in Patients With AML Allo HSCT in Recipients
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05424562 -
A Study to Assess Change in Disease State in Adult Participants With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Ineligible for Intensive Chemotherapy Receiving Oral Venetoclax Tablets in Canada
|
||
Completed |
NCT03197714 -
Clinical Trial of OPB-111077 in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukaemia
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03844048 -
An Extension Study of Venetoclax for Subjects Who Have Completed a Prior Venetoclax Clinical Trial
|
Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04070768 -
Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin (GO) and Venetoclax in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory CD33+ Acute Myeloid Leukemia:Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium BTCRC-AML17-113
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04107727 -
Trial to Compare Efficacy and Safety of Chemotherapy/Quizartinib vs Chemotherapy/Placebo in Adults FMS-like Tyrosine Kinase 3 (FLT3) Wild-type Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04920500 -
Bioequivalence of Daunorubicin Cytarabine Liposomes in Naive AML Patients
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04385290 -
Combination of Midostaurin and Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin in First-line Standard Therapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (MOSAIC)
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03897127 -
Study of Standard Intensive Chemotherapy Versus Intensive Chemotherapy With CPX-351 in Adult Patients With Newly Diagnosed AML and Intermediate- or Adverse Genetics
|
Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04021368 -
RVU120 in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia or High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03665480 -
The Effect of G-CSF on MRD After Induction Therapy in Newly Diagnosed AML
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02485535 -
Selinexor in Treating Patients With Intermediate- and High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia or High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome After Transplant
|
Phase 1 | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT04093570 -
A Study for Participants Who Participated in Prior Clinical Studies of ASTX727 (Standard Dose), With a Food Effect Substudy at Select Study Centers
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04069208 -
IA14 Induction in Young Acute Myeloid Leukemia
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05744739 -
Tomivosertib in Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04969601 -
Anti-Covid-19 Vaccine in Children With Acute Leukemia and Their Siblings
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03941769 -
2018-0674 - IL-7 for T-Cell Recovery Post Haplo and CB Transplant - Phase I/II
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 |