Acute Myeloid Leukemia Clinical Trial
Official title:
Effectiveness of DNA Hypomethylating Agents and Lenalidomide in Elderly Patients With Myeloid Malignancies in the United States
| Verified date | April 2019 |
| Source | The Cleveland Clinic |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | |
| Study type | Observational [Patient Registry] |
The study aims to comprehensively analyze data from a large and unselected older AML population in the US, both treated and untreated. These data will widen understanding of treatment decisions for the older Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) population. Through use of the SEER-Medicare Registry, the effectiveness and impact of HMA treatments as well as the effectiveness of lenalidomide will be studied.
| Status | Withdrawn |
| Enrollment | 0 |
| Est. completion date | September 30, 2020 |
| Est. primary completion date | September 30, 2020 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | 66 Years and older |
| Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - patients with myeloid malignancies diagnosed during 2001-2011 at the age of 66 years or older - alive in September 2004 (i.e. 3 months after FDA approval of azacitidine for MDS) - known month of diagnosis, and not identified from death certificates or autopsy only - continuous Medicare Part A and B coverage, and were not enrolled in a health maintenance organization during the period of interest Exclusion Criteria: - Anyone under 66 years |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Cleveland Clinic | Cleveland | Ohio |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| The Cleveland Clinic | Celgene |
United States,
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Participants on hypomethylating agents (HMA) and the effectiveness of HMA in the SEER-Medicare MDS population | Study patterns & determinants of HMA use in SEER-Medicare MDS population: Use of "2+BCBM" to ID registered & unregistered MDS cases. Map out geographical distribution of HMA use based on MDS patients reclassified by SMMRS, which will yield the proportion of higher-risk (HR) & lower-risk (LR) patients receiving HMA. Survival times to be analyzed using Cox models with time varying covariates. Predictors to be selected for both types of responses using learning interactions via hierarchical group-lasso regularization & monotone spline transformations. Utilization of non-parametric random Forest & random Survival Forest methods to build regression models & assess goodness of fit & functional form of the model-based results. Conduction of propensity score analyses of treatment effects as an alternative method for treatment-assignment bias correction. Propensity scores to be calculated using a generalized boosting method as implemented in the R package twang. Computations will be done in R. | Analaysis restricted to patients alive at least 3 months after HMA approval. Patients will be followed from date of their first MDS claim (index date) through death or study end, whichever occurred first. | |
| Primary | Develop predictive models of HMA treatment outcomes using SEER-Medicare data | To develop predictive models of HMA treatment outcomes using SEER-Medicare data: Treatment response analysis will include variables that are extractable from SEER-Medicare files that can be used to infer standard clinical response criteria. The outcome measures will include: 1) the proportion of patients completing an HMA therapeutic-length treatment episode (TTE) [6 cycles = ~6 months]; 2) changes in transfusion dependence; 3) the number of acute hospitalizations during the HMA therapy period; 4) the time from treatment initiation for MDS to progression to AML; and 5) overall survival from the time of HMA initiation. | Analaysis restricted to patients alive at least 3 months after HMA approval. Patients will be followed from date of their first MDS claim (index date) through death or study end, whichever occurred first. | |
| Secondary | Effectiveness of lenalidomide in the SEER-Medicare MDS population | An adequate sample size is used to undertake assessment of several variables that affect use of lenalidomide as well as treatment outcomes which aim to analyze (a) prescribing patters of lenalidomide among the low risk (LR)and high risk (HR) MDS with time (from 2006 to 2013) and consistency with clinical guidelines (b) trends in combination therapy (lenalidomide + other MDS therapies) with time (c) determinants of response to lenalidomide - underlying comorbidities, duration of treatment exposure (in terms of number of cycles), concomitant use of azacitidine or other MDS therapies with transfusion status (e) associations between lenalidomide and a variety of outcomes, including survival, progression to AML, secondary solid tumor malignancies and thromboembolic events and (e) differences in lenalidomide use and outcome between MDS Centers of Excellence (using data from MDS Clinical Consortium) versus community setting. | Analaysis restricted to patients alive at least 3 months after HMA approval. Patients will be followed from date of their first MDS claim (index date) through death or study end, whichever occurred first. | |
| Secondary | Identify the role of HMA (with its salient features of better tolerability and lesser toxicity) as a new treatment paradigm for older AML patients and enable comparison of outcomes with HMA vs other "conventional" leukemia therapies. | To develop predictive models of HMA treatment outcomes using SEER-Medicare data: Treatment response analysis will include variables that are extractable from SEER-Medicare files that can be used to infer standard clinical response criteria. The outcome measures will include: 1) the proportion of patients completing an HMA therapeutic-length treatment episode (TTE) [6 cycles = ~6 months]; 2) changes in transfusion dependence; 3) the number of acute hospitalizations during the HMA therapy period; 4) the time from treatment initiation for MDS to progression to AML; and 5) overall survival from the time of HMA initiation. | Analaysis restricted to patients alive at least 3 months after HMA approval. Patients will be followed from date of their first MDS claim (index date) through death or study end, whichever occurred first. |
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recruiting |
NCT05400122 -
Natural Killer (NK) Cells in Combination With Interleukin-2 (IL-2) and Transforming Growth Factor Beta (TGFbeta) Receptor I Inhibitor Vactosertib in Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT04460235 -
Immunogenicity of an Anti-pneumococcal Combined Vaccination in Acute Leukemia or Lymphoma
|
Phase 4 | |
| Completed |
NCT04022785 -
PLX51107 and Azacitidine in Treating Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome
|
Phase 1 | |
| Completed |
NCT03678493 -
A Study of FMT in Patients With AML Allo HSCT in Recipients
|
Phase 2 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05424562 -
A Study to Assess Change in Disease State in Adult Participants With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Ineligible for Intensive Chemotherapy Receiving Oral Venetoclax Tablets in Canada
|
||
| Terminated |
NCT03224819 -
Study of Emerfetamab (AMG 673) in Adults With Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
|
Early Phase 1 | |
| Completed |
NCT03197714 -
Clinical Trial of OPB-111077 in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukaemia
|
Phase 1 | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT04070768 -
Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin (GO) and Venetoclax in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory CD33+ Acute Myeloid Leukemia:Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium BTCRC-AML17-113
|
Phase 1 | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT03844048 -
An Extension Study of Venetoclax for Subjects Who Have Completed a Prior Venetoclax Clinical Trial
|
Phase 3 | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT04107727 -
Trial to Compare Efficacy and Safety of Chemotherapy/Quizartinib vs Chemotherapy/Placebo in Adults FMS-like Tyrosine Kinase 3 (FLT3) Wild-type Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
|
Phase 2 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT04920500 -
Bioequivalence of Daunorubicin Cytarabine Liposomes in Naive AML Patients
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT04385290 -
Combination of Midostaurin and Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin in First-line Standard Therapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (MOSAIC)
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT03897127 -
Study of Standard Intensive Chemotherapy Versus Intensive Chemotherapy With CPX-351 in Adult Patients With Newly Diagnosed AML and Intermediate- or Adverse Genetics
|
Phase 3 | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT04021368 -
RVU120 in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia or High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome
|
Phase 1 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT03665480 -
The Effect of G-CSF on MRD After Induction Therapy in Newly Diagnosed AML
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
| Completed |
NCT02485535 -
Selinexor in Treating Patients With Intermediate- and High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia or High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome After Transplant
|
Phase 1 | |
| Enrolling by invitation |
NCT04093570 -
A Study for Participants Who Participated in Prior Clinical Studies of ASTX727 (Standard Dose), With a Food Effect Substudy at Select Study Centers
|
Phase 2 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT04069208 -
IA14 Induction in Young Acute Myeloid Leukemia
|
Phase 2 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05744739 -
Tomivosertib in Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
|
Phase 1 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT04969601 -
Anti-Covid-19 Vaccine in Children With Acute Leukemia and Their Siblings
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 |