Acute Myeloid Leukemia Clinical Trial
— BRIGHT 1012Official title:
An Open-label Phase 1b Study of PF-04449913 (Glasdegib) in Combination With Azacitidine in Patients With Previously Untreated Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome, Acute Myeloid Leukemia, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Verified date | April 2023 |
Source | Pfizer |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This multi center open label Phase 1b study is designed to evaluate the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of glasdegib (PF-04449913) when combined with azacitidine in patients with previously untreated Higher Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS), Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML). This clinical study includes two components: (a) a safety lead in cohort (LIC) and (b) an expansion phase with an AML cohort and an MDS cohort.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 73 |
Est. completion date | March 7, 2022 |
Est. primary completion date | January 29, 2020 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion criteria: - Patients must have previously untreated MDS, AML, or CMML according to the WHO 2016 classification. - MDS patients must have Intermediate (>3 to 4.5 points), High Risk (>4.5 - 6) or Very High Risk (>6 points) disease according to the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System 2012 (IPSS-R). - Clinical indication for treatment with azacitidine for MDS or AML. Exclusion criteria: - Patients with AML who are candidates for standard induction chemotherapy as first line treatment. - Patients with known active CNS leukemia. - Prior treatment with a smoothened inhibitor (SMOi) and/or hypomethylating agent. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Belgium | Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen - Campus Stuivenberg | Antwerpen | |
Belgium | UZ Leuven | Leuven | |
Canada | Tom Baker Cancer Center | Calgary | Alberta |
Canada | University Of Alberta Hospital | Edmonton | Alberta |
France | CHU d'Amiens-Picardie - Hopital SUD | Amiens cedex 01 | |
France | Hopital Saint-Louis (AP-HP) - Service Hematologie Senior | Paris CEDEX 10 | |
France | Hospices Civils de Lyon - Hopital Lyon Sud- Hematologie | Pierre Benite Cedex | |
France | CHU de Tours-Hopital Bretonneau-Centre Regional de cancerologie Henry Kaplan | Tours Cedex 01 | |
Germany | Staedtisches Klinikum Braunschweig gGmbH | Braunschweig | |
United Kingdom | King's College Hospital | London | |
United Kingdom | The Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust | Newcastle upon Tyne | |
United Kingdom | Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust | Oxford | |
United States | The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins | Baltimore | Maryland |
United States | University of Alabama at Birmingham | Birmingham | Alabama |
United States | University of Alabama at Birmingham the Kirklin Clinic | Birmingham | Alabama |
United States | Montefiore Einstein Center for Cancer | Bronx | New York |
United States | Montefiore Medical Center | Bronx | New York |
United States | Roswell Park Cancer Institute | Buffalo | New York |
United States | Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center | Cleveland | Ohio |
United States | Duke University Health System | Durham | North Carolina |
United States | Duke University Health System, Duke University Hospital | Durham | North Carolina |
United States | Duke University Health System: Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Clinic | Durham | North Carolina |
United States | Investigational Chemotherapy Service | Durham | North Carolina |
United States | UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center | La Jolla | California |
United States | Henry-Joyce Cancer Center | Nashville | Tennessee |
United States | Vanderbilt - Ingram Cancer Center | Nashville | Tennessee |
United States | Smilow Cancer Center at Yale New Haven Hospital | New Haven | Connecticut |
United States | Huntsman Cancer Hospital | Salt Lake City | Utah |
United States | Huntsman Cancer Institute | Salt Lake City | Utah |
United States | Seattle Cancer Care Alliance (SCCA) | Seattle | Washington |
United States | University of Washington Medical Center (UWMC) | Seattle | Washington |
United States | Stony Brook University | Stony Brook | New York |
United States | Stony Brook University Hospital Cancer Center | Stony Brook | New York |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Pfizer |
United States, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, United Kingdom,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) in the Lead-in Cohort (LIC) | An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship with the study treatment. TEAEs were AEs that occurred after initiation of treatment or AEs increasing in severity during treatment. Treatment-related TEAEs were determined by the investigator. Grades of AEs were defined by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 4.03.Grade 1=asymptomatic/mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2=minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental activity of daily living (ADL); Grade 3=severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization of prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4=events with life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5= death related to AE. | maximum of approximately 15 months | |
Primary | Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in the LIC | A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that resulted in death; was life threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. Treatment-related SAEs were determined by the investigator. | maximum of approximately 15 months | |
Primary | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in the LIC | Hematology lab parameters included activated partial thromboplastin time, hemoglobin, prothrombin international normalized ratio, lymphocyte, neutrophil, platelet, white blood cell; chemistry parameters included alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline aminotransferase, blood bilirubin, creatine phosphokinase, creatinine, calcium, blood glucose, potassium, magnesium, sodium, albumin, phosphate. Grades of lab abnormalities were defined by NCI CTCAE version 4.03. Grade 1(mild)=asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated;Grade 2(moderate)=minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADL;Grade 3=severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling limiting self-care ADL;Grade 4=life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated. Grade 1-4 results are reported. | maximum of approximately 16 months | |
Primary | Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete Remission (CR) in the AML and MDS Cohorts | Percentage of participants achieving CR as defined by the 2017 European Leukemia Net (ELN) Response Criteria for all participants with AML and modified International Working Group (IWG) criteria (2006) for all participants with MDS in the expansion cohorts.
For AML cohort, CR was defined as neutrophils = 1 x 10^9/L, platelets = 1 x 10^11/L, percentage of bone marrow blasts (BMB) <5% with no peripheral blasts and no blasts with Auer rods, no extramedullary disease (EMD), and transfusion independent. For MDS cohort, CR was defined as having responses of hemoglobin =11 g/dL, neutrophils =1 x 10^9/L, platelets =1 x 10^11/L, percentage of blasts = 0%, percentage of BMB=5%, and normal maturation of all cell lines (note if has persistent dysplasia), and all responses must last at least 4 weeks. |
maximum of 23 months in AML cohort and 34 months in MDS cohort | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete Remission (CR) + Partial Remission (PR) in the LIC | Response rate (Percentage of participants achieving CR + PR among all the enrolled and treated patients) as defined by modified International Working Group (IWG) criteria (2006) in the LIC. CR was defined as having responses of hemoglobin =11 g/dL, neutrophils =1 x 10^9/L, platelets =1 x 10^11/L, percentage of blasts = 0%, percentage of BMB=5%, and normal maturation of all cell lines (note if has persistent dysplasia), and all responses must last at least 4 weeks. PR was defined as meeting all CR criteria if abnormal before treatment except BMB, percentage of BMB decreased by =50% but still >5% for at least 4 weeks. | maximum of approximately 16 months | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Efficacy Measures Other Than CR in the LIC | Number of participants with efficacy measures other than CR as defined by modified IWG criteria (2006) in LIC, including marrow CR(mCR), stable disease(SD), hematologic improvement(HI). CR: hemoglobin=11 g/dL, neutrophils=1 x 10^9/L, platelets=1 x 10^11/L, percentage of blasts=0%, percentage of BMB=5%, normal maturation of all cell lines (note if has persistent dysplasia), all responses last at least 4 weeks. mCR: BMB=5% & decreased by=50%. SD: failure to achieve PR, no evidence of progression. HI: erythroid response (pretreatment<11g/dL): hemoglobin increase by=1.5 g/dL, relevant reduction of units of red blood cell transfusions by at least 4 transfusions/8 weeks compared to pretreatment transfusion number in previous 8 weeks; platelet response (pretreatment<1x10^11/L): increase of=30x10^9/L if starting with >20x10^9/L, and increase from <20x10^9/L to >20x10^9/L and by at least 100%; neutrophil response (pretreatment<1x10^9/L): at least a 100% increase, absolute increase >0.5x10^9/L | maximum of approximately 16 months | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With TEAEs in the AML and MDS Cohorts | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship with the study treatment. TEAEs were AEs that occurred after initiation of treatment or AEs increasing in severity during treatment. Treatment-related TEAEs were determined by the investigator. Grades of AEs were defined by NCI CTCAE version 4.03.Grade 1=asymptomatic/mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2=minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADL; Grade 3=severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization of prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4=events with life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5= death related to AE. | maximum of around 23 months in AML cohort and 40 months in MDS cohort | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With SAEs in the AML and MDS Cohorts | An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that resulted in death; was life threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. Treatment-related SAEs were determined by the investigator. | maximum of around 23 months in AML cohort and 40 months in MDS cohort | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in the AML and MDS Cohorts | Hematology lab parameters included activated partial thromboplastin time, hemoglobin, prothrombin international normalized ratio, lymphocyte, neutrophil, platelet, white blood cell; chemistry parameters included alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline aminotransferase, blood bilirubin, creatine phosphokinase, creatinine, calcium, blood glucose, potassium, magnesium, sodium, albumin, phosphate. Grades of lab abnormalities were defined by NCI CTCAE version 4.03. Grade 1(mild)=asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated;Grade 2(moderate)=minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADL;Grade 3=severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling limiting self-care ADL;Grade 4=life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated. Grade 1-4 results are reported. | maximum of around 23 months in AML cohort and 40 months in MDS cohort | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Disease-Specific Efficacy Measures in the AML Cohort | Number of participants with partial hematologic recovery (CRh), CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi), partial remission (PR), stable disease (SD), and morphologic leukemia free state (MLFS). CRh: neutrophils>5x10^8/L, platelets>5x10^10/L, BMB<5%, no peripheral blasts, no blasts with Auer rods, no extramedullary disease (EMD), not qualifying for CR. CRi: neutrophils <1x10^9/L or platelets<1x10^11/L; BMB <5%, no peripheral blasts, no blasts with Auer rods; no EMD; neutrophils or platelets not recovered; not qualifying for CRh. PR: neutrophils =1x10^9/L; platelets =1x10^11/L; blasts decreased to 5-25% and =50% decrease from pretreatment; blasts=5% if Auer rod positive. SD: =3 months of absence of CR without minimal residual disease (CRMRD-), CR, CRh, CRi, PR, and MLFS, criteria for PD not met. MLFS: neutrophils <1x10^9/L and platelets<1x10^11/L, BMB<5%, no blasts with Auer rods; no EMD; neutrophils and platelets not recovered; not qualifying for CRi | maximum of 23 months | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Disease-Specific Efficacy Measures in the MDS Cohort | Number of participants with PR, mCR, SD, complete or partial cytogenetic response, and HI. PR: BMB >5% and decreased by =50% (at least 4 weeks), meeting all CR criteria if abnormal before treatment except BMB. mCR: BMB =5% and decreased by =50%. SD: failure to achieve PR, no evidence of progression. Complete or partial cytogenic response: disappearance of chromosomal abnormality without new ones, or = 50% reduction of chromosomal abnormality. HI: erythroid response (pretreatment <11g/dL): hemoglobin increase by=1.5 g/dL, relevant reduction of units of red blood cell transfusions by at least 4 transfusions/8 weeks compared to pretreatment transfusion number in previous 8 weeks; platelet response (pretreatment <1x10^11/L): increase of =30x10^9/L if starting with >20x10^9/L, and increase from <20x10^9/L to >20x10^9/L and by at least 100%; neutrophil response (pretreatment <1x10^9/L): at least a 100% increase, absolute increase >0.5x10^9/L. | maximum of 34 months | |
Secondary | Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Median Overall Survival (OS) in the AML and MDS Cohorts | Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from date of first study treatment to date of death from any cause. Patients last known to be alive were to be censored at the date of last contact. OS was analyzed and displayed graphically for each expansion cohort separately using the Kaplan-Meier method. The median event time and corresponding two-sided 95%CI were provided for each cohort. OS was first analyzed when the primary endpoint of CR was analyzed in the respective expansion cohort. | maximum of approximately 32 months in AML cohort and 32 months in MDS cohort | |
Secondary | Duration of CR in the AML and MDS Cohorts | Duration of CR was defined as the duration from date of first achieving CR to the date of disease progression (relapse) after CR, or death due to any cause. Participants last known to be alive who were free from disease progression or relapse after CR were censored at the date of the last assessment that verified their disease status. Duration of CR was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Disease progression was defined as: percentage of bone marrow blasts increased by =50% to >5% (for participants with <5% blasts at screening), >10% (for participants with 5-10% blasts at screening), >20% (for participants with 11-20% blasts at screening) or >30% (for participants with 21-30% blasts at screening), and with any of the following condition: at least 50% decrease from maximum remission/response in granulocytes or platelets; reduction in hemoglobin by =2 g/dL; transfusion dependence. | maximum of 23 months in AML cohort and 34 months in MDS cohort | |
Secondary | Time to CR in the AML and MDS Cohorts | Time to CR was defined for participants in the expansion cohorts who had achieved response on study as the time from date of the first dose of study drug to date of the first documentation of response. Time to CR was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. | maximum of 23 months in AML cohort and 34 months in MDS cohort | |
Secondary | Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Glasdegib Dosed in Combination With Azacitidine (C1D7) and When Dosed Alone (C1D15) in the Lead-in Cohort | Maximum plasma concentration of glasdegib dosed in combination with azacitidine (C1D7) and when dosed alone (C1D15) in the Lead-in Cohort was estimated using non-compartmental analysis. | Pre-dose and 0.25, 1, 4, 6, 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 7 and Cycle 1 Day 15 | |
Secondary | Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Glasdegib Dosed in Combination With Azacitidine (C1D7) and When Dosed Alone (C1D15) in the Lead-in Cohort | Area under the plasma concentration curve from time zero to end of dosing interval (AUCtau) of glasdegib dosed in combination with azacitidine (C1D7) and when dosed alone (C1D15) in the Lead-in Cohort was estimated using non-compartmental analysis. | Pre-dose and 0.25, 1, 4, 6, 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 7 and Cycle 1 Day 15 | |
Secondary | Time to First Occurrence of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Glasdegib Dosed in Combination With Azacitidine (C1D7) and When Dosed Alone (C1D15) in the Lead-in Cohort | Time to first occurrence of maximum plasma concentration of glasdegib dosed in combination with azacitidine (C1D7) and when dosed alone (C1D15) in the Lead-in Cohort was estimated using non-compartmental analysis. | Pre-dose and 0.25, 1, 4, 6, 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 7 and Cycle 1 Day 15 | |
Secondary | Cmax of Azacitidine Dosed in Combination With Glasdegib (C1D7) and When Dosed Alone (C1D1) in the Lead-in Cohort | Maximum plasma concentration of azacitidine dosed in combination with glasdegib (C1D7) and when dosed alone (C1D1) in the Lead-in Cohort was estimated using non-compartmental analysis. | 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 6 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1, predose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 6 hours postdose on Cycle 1 Day 7 | |
Secondary | Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time (AUCinf) of Azacitidine Dosed in Combination With Glasdegib (C1D7) and When Dosed Alone (C1D1) in the Lead-in Cohort | Area under the plasma concentration curve from time zero to extrapolated infinite time of azacitidine dosed in combination with glasdegib (C1D7) and when dosed alone (C1D1) in the Lead-in Cohort was estimated using non-compartmental analysis. | 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 6 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1, predose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 6 hours postdose on Cycle 1 Day 7 | |
Secondary | Tmax of Azacitidine Dosed in Combination With Glasdegib (C1D7) and When Dosed Alone (C1D1) in the Lead-in Cohort | Time to first occurrence of maximum plasma concentration of azacitidine dosed in combination with glasdegib (C1D7) and when dosed alone (C1D1) in the Lead-in Cohort was estimated using non-compartmental analysis. | 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 6 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1, predose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 6 hours postdose on Cycle 1 Day 7 | |
Secondary | Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of Glasdegib on Cycle 1 Day 15 and Cycle 2 Day 1 in the AML and MDS Cohorts | Trough plasma concentration was defined as the estimated lowest concentration before next dose administration. | Pre-dose and 1 and 4 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15 (C1D15) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (C2D1) | |
Secondary | Number of Participants Meeting Categorical Criteria of QTcF Values in LIC, AML and MDS Cohorts | Number of participants that met categorical criteria of QTcF values in LIC, AML and MDS cohorts | maximum of approximately 15 months in the LIC cohort, 23 months in AML cohort, and 40 months in MDS cohort |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT05400122 -
Natural Killer (NK) Cells in Combination With Interleukin-2 (IL-2) and Transforming Growth Factor Beta (TGFbeta) Receptor I Inhibitor Vactosertib in Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04460235 -
Immunogenicity of an Anti-pneumococcal Combined Vaccination in Acute Leukemia or Lymphoma
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT03678493 -
A Study of FMT in Patients With AML Allo HSCT in Recipients
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04022785 -
PLX51107 and Azacitidine in Treating Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05424562 -
A Study to Assess Change in Disease State in Adult Participants With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Ineligible for Intensive Chemotherapy Receiving Oral Venetoclax Tablets in Canada
|
||
Completed |
NCT03197714 -
Clinical Trial of OPB-111077 in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukaemia
|
Phase 1 | |
Terminated |
NCT03224819 -
Study of Emerfetamab (AMG 673) in Adults With Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
|
Early Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03844048 -
An Extension Study of Venetoclax for Subjects Who Have Completed a Prior Venetoclax Clinical Trial
|
Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04070768 -
Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin (GO) and Venetoclax in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory CD33+ Acute Myeloid Leukemia:Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium BTCRC-AML17-113
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04107727 -
Trial to Compare Efficacy and Safety of Chemotherapy/Quizartinib vs Chemotherapy/Placebo in Adults FMS-like Tyrosine Kinase 3 (FLT3) Wild-type Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04920500 -
Bioequivalence of Daunorubicin Cytarabine Liposomes in Naive AML Patients
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04385290 -
Combination of Midostaurin and Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin in First-line Standard Therapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (MOSAIC)
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03897127 -
Study of Standard Intensive Chemotherapy Versus Intensive Chemotherapy With CPX-351 in Adult Patients With Newly Diagnosed AML and Intermediate- or Adverse Genetics
|
Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04021368 -
RVU120 in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia or High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03665480 -
The Effect of G-CSF on MRD After Induction Therapy in Newly Diagnosed AML
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02485535 -
Selinexor in Treating Patients With Intermediate- and High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia or High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome After Transplant
|
Phase 1 | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT04093570 -
A Study for Participants Who Participated in Prior Clinical Studies of ASTX727 (Standard Dose), With a Food Effect Substudy at Select Study Centers
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04069208 -
IA14 Induction in Young Acute Myeloid Leukemia
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05744739 -
Tomivosertib in Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04969601 -
Anti-Covid-19 Vaccine in Children With Acute Leukemia and Their Siblings
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 |