View clinical trials related to Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
Filter by:An open-label design is adopted in this study. All patients will first undergo pre-screening to determine the mutation status of IDH, and all patients will be assigned to the registry study of the corresponding cohorts of IDH1 and IDH2 based on the pre-screening results. Patients with both IDH1 and IDH2 mutations will be enrolled in the IDH2 cohort. This study is divided into two cohorts. Cohort 1 includes R/R AML patients with IDH1-R132 mutations; Cohort 2 includes R/R AML patients with IDH2-R140 and R172 mutations. The two cohorts are designed independently and will be analyzed separately for statistical hypothesis testing. Patients in both cohorts will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio according to the central Interactive Web Response System (IWRS) into the test or control group, patients in the test group will receive HMPL-306 monotherapy at a dose of 250 mg once daily (QD) (Cycle 1, C1) + 150 mg QD [starting from Cycle 2 (C2)]. Patients in the control group will receive salvage chemotherapy (one of four options) consisting of two intensive chemotherapy regimens (MEC regimen and FLAG ± Ida regimen) and two non-intensive chemotherapy regimens (azacitidine and LoDAC)
To evaluate the feasibility, effectiveness and safety of chidamide combined with venetoclax and azacitidine in the treatment of newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are not suitable for intensive chemotherapy.
Study GLB-001-02 is a phase 1, open-label clinical study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and preliminary efficacy of GLB-001 in study participants with relapsed or refractory or intolerant myeloid malignancies including polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), myelofibrosis (MF), lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (LR-MDS), higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS), and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). This study consists of 3 parts, dose escalation (Phase 1a), dose exploration (Phase 1b) and dose expansion (Phase 1c). Dose escalation (Phase 1a) and dose exploration (Phase 1b) will evaluate the safety, tolerability, PK, PD and preliminary efficacy of GLB-001, administered orally, in study participants with PV/ET, or study participants with MF/LR-MDS/HR-MDS/AML, respectively. Dose expansion (Phase 1c) will be followed to determine the relationships among dose, exposure, toxicity, tolerability and clinical activity, to identify minimally active dose, and to select the recommended dose(s) for phase 2 study. Approximately 108 study participants may be enrolled in the study.
Test feasibility of an oral maintenance strategy for transplant eligible AML patients in first CR who are medically underserved or have a disadvantage in the CDC SDOH domains
This phase I trial tests the safety, side effects, and best dose of iadademstat when given together with azacitidine and venetoclax in treating patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Iadademstat inhibits the LSD1 protein and may lead to inhibition of cell growth in LSD1-overexpressing cancer cells. Chemotherapy drugs, such as azacitidine, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Venetoclax is in a class of medications called B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) inhibitors. It may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking Bcl-2, a protein needed for cancer cell survival. Giving iadademstat with azacitidine and venetoclax may be safe, tolerable and/or effective in treating patients with newly diagnosed AML who cannot undergo intensive chemotherapy.
The goal of this clinical trial is to test the ability to restore gut microbiota to healthier levels in patients with blood cancers scheduled to have stem cell transplant. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Tolerability and acceptability of intestinal microbiota transplantation (IMT) versus placebo (as assessed via patient perspective questionnaires - Changes in gut microbiome diversity across all timepoints - Markers of general health, infective/microbiological and haematological outcomes including, days of fever, admission to intensive care unit, survival, non-relapsed mortality, and incidence of graft-versus-host disease across all time points measured. Participants will be asked at their routine follow up visits to, - Provide stool, urine and blood samples at the scheduled study visits - Complete questionnaires at selected visits - Swallow either Placebo or IMT capsules once at the second study visit which will occur 2 weeks prior to the stem cell transplant (+/-3 days) Researchers will compare IMT capsules and Placebo to investigate the change in gut microbiota diversity.
This is a single-arm, single-dose dose-escalation and dose-expansion study.
Patients eligible for a mismatch allogeneic stem cell transplant will receive Venetoclax daily for 7 days prior to transplant in addition to the following chemotherapy regimen: Decitabine daily for 5 days, Fludarabine daily for 5 days, and Busulfan daily for 2 days followed by 1 day of total body irradiation. Stem cell transplant will occur thereafter.
The purpose of the study is to observe the outcomes of patients with acute myeloid leukemia who do not receive an immediate second round of chemotherapy after undergoing a standard mid-induction bone marrow biopsy.
This phase II MyeloMATCH treatment trial compares the usual treatment of azacitidine and venetoclax to the combination treatment of azacitidine, venetoclax and gilteritinib in treating older and unfit patients with acute myeloid leukemia and FLT3 mutations. Azacitidine is a drug that is absorbed into DNA and leads to the activation of cancer suppressor genes, which are genes that help control cell growth. Venetoclax is in a class of medications called B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2) inhibitors. It may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking Bcl-2, a protein needed for cancer cell survival. Gilteritinib is in a class of medications called kinase inhibitors. It works by blocking the action of a certain naturally occurring substance that may be needed to help cancer cells multiply. This study may help doctors find out if these different approaches are better than the usual approaches. To decide if they are better, the study doctors are looking to see if the study drugs lead to a higher percentage of patients achieving a deeper remission compared to the usual approach.