View clinical trials related to Acute Lung Injury.
Filter by:Investigation of effect of inhalation sedation by administration of Sevoflurane compared with Propofol on the moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome course in mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis.
During the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), patients' response to positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is variable according to different degrees of lung recruitability. The search for a tool to individualize PEEP on the basis of patients' individual response is warranted. Measurement of end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) by the nitrogen washin-washout technique, bedside available from recent ICU ventilators, has been shown to reliably estimate PEEP-induced alveolar recruitment and may therefore help titrate PEEP on patient's individual requirements. The authors designed an open-label, multicenter, randomized trial to test whether an individualized PEEP setting protocol driven by EELV may improve a composite clinical outcome in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS.
Patients prospectively classified to the hyper-inflammatory ARDS phenotype on the basis of clinical characteristics and a novel POC biomarker assay will have worse clinical outcomes than the hypo-inflammatory phenotype. Study Aim The purpose of this project is to prospectively identify hyper- and hypo-inflammatory phenotypes in patients with ARDS and determine clinical outcomes associated with each phenotype. The primary objective of this study is to assess the clinical outcomes in patients with ARDS according to their prospectively defined inflammatory phenotype determined using a POC assay. Results of group allocation will be blinded to clinical and research staff until database lock. Secondary Objectives The secondary objectives of this study are to: (i) Assess the agreement of the phenotype allocation using the POC assay and the clinical study dataset. (ii) Assess the stability of phenotype allocation over time (iii) To test feasibility of delivering a POC assay in the NHS intensive care setting.
Perform a pilot study of quality improvement interventions for critical care physicians (intensivists) and respiratory therapists (RTs) to improve application of low tidal volume mechanical ventilation (LTVV) for patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) using the computerized mechanical ventilation protocols currently available in the investigator's Cerner electronic health record (EHR).
We hypothesize that combined critical care ultrasound and PAC monitoring-oriented therapy protocol (CUP protocol), would improve prognosis of patients of ARDS with right ventricular dysfunction. Therefore, the overall goal of the study is: 1) To build the combined critical care ultrasound and PAC monitoring-oriented therapy protocol （CUP Protocol）in detail for patients of ARDS with RV dysfunction. Advantage of CUP protocol is that it directly aims at key parameters that we need for the prevention and treatment of such patients; we could improve the mechanical ventilation protocol, unequal pulmonary lesions, hemodynamics management and reduce pulmonary artery pressure according to these parameters, so that to improve the prognosis of the patients.2) To verify the value of CUP Protocol in ARDS with ACP.
Sepsis is a dysregulated host response to severe life-threatening infections, leading to organ failure and death in up to 40% of patients with septic shock. Pulmonary infections are the main cause of community-acquired sepsis and frequently lead to the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS). Features of immunosuppression, including diminished cell surface monocyte human leukocyte antigen DR (mHLA-DR) expression, are strongly associated with hospital mortality. Such decrease in HLA-DR expression on antigen-presenting cells has been associated with impairment of microbial antigens to Tcells. Septic patients also show elevated expression of inhibitory receptors associated with cell exhaustion.. Yet, biochemical, flow cytometric and immunohistochemical findings consistent with immunosuppression have been observed in lungs and spleen of patients died of sepsis and multiple organ failure, demonstrating the relevance of studying these defects directly in organ tissues. A novel approach aimed to characterize the role and prognostic value of alveolar biomarkers measured directly in the injured lungs is warranted and supported by: -disappointing results of previous clinical trials attempting to restore the level of biomarkers measured on circulating cells; -evidences of regional immunosuppression in lungs of ARDS patients; -lung is the main site of hospital-acquired infections with a prevalence of ventilator-associated pneumonia in 30% over the course of Intensive Care Unit(ICU) stay in ARDS patients. Investigators speculate that biomarkers measured on alveolar leukocytes (AL) surface, are important predictors of outcome and potential therapeutic targets in ICU patients with pneumonia-associated ARDS. Investigators aim to explore whether biomarkers measured directly on AL from patients with pneumonia-associated ARDS are associated to regional pulmonary immunosuppression using leukocyte functional tests; and predictors of outcomes. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid(BALF) and blood samples will be collected in ARDS patients. Leukocyte populations and cell membrane biomarkers will be quantified using flow cytometry. Leukocyte functional tests will be performed ex vivo on leukocytes collected from BALF and blood samples. Pharmacological interventions will be performed ex vivo. This project aims to identify biomarkers associated with outcomes and potential therapeutic targets.
The renal Doppler resistive index (RRI) is a noninvasive tool that has been used to assess renal perfusion in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting. Many parameters have been described as influential on the values of renal RI. Mechanical ventilation is associated with significant increases in the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI). Ventilator-induced kidney injury (VIKI) is believed to occur due to changes in hemodynamics that impair renal perfusion. The investigators hypothesized that patients who need mechanical ventilation should have a different response in RRI when different levels of Positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) are applied. Investigators wish to describe changing in RRI due to changes in PEEP and to verify whether these changes could partially explain the occurrence of VIKI
Determination of the best positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) based on oxygenation or driving pressure in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) after cardiothoracic surgery The use of a positive end-expiratory pressure in acute respiratory distress syndrome is obvious in ARDS management. On the one hand it serves to fight against the reduction of functional residual capacity (FRC) and enable the limitation of hypoxia; and on the other hand it allows the limitation of "opening/closing" lesions in pulmonary alveoli which lead to increase "bio trauma". However elevated PEEP has harmful effect such as hemodynamic effect on the right ventricle and distension on healthy part of the lung.Other adverse effects are: decreasing cardiac output, increased risk of barotrauma, and the interference with assessment of hemodynamic pressures. Ideally the adjustment of PEEP level must be done by taking into account each patient characteristic. PEEP titration based on blood gas analysis is one of the most used techniques by physicians. Current guidelines for lung-protective ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) suggest the use of low tidal volumes (Vt), set according to ideal body weight (IBW) of the patient, and higher levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to limit ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). However, recent studies have shown that ARDS patients who are ventilated according to these guidelines may still be exposed to forces that can induce or aggravate lung injury. Driving pressure (DP) is the difference between the airway pressure at the end of inspiration (plateau pressure, Ppl) and PEEP. Driving pressure may be a valuable tool to set PEEP. Independent of the strategy used to titrate PEEP, changes in PEEP levels should consider the impact on driving pressure, besides other variables such as gas exchange and hemodynamics. A decrease in driving pressure after increasing PEEP will necessarily reflect recruitment and a decrease in cyclic strain. On the contrary, an increase in driving pressure will suggest a non-recruitable lung, in which overdistension prevails over recruitment. The main purposes of this study are to assess the optimal PEEP based on the best driving pressure or the best oxygenation.
This is a multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial with an adaptive design assessing the efficacy of setting the ventilator based on measurements of respiratory mechanics (recruitability and effort) to reduce Day 60 mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The CAVIARDS study is also a basket trial; a basket trial design examines a single intervention in multiple disease populations. CAVIARDS consists of an identical 2-arm mechanical ventilation protocol implemented in two different study populations (COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients). As per a typical basket trial design, the operational structure of both the COVID-19 substudy (CAVIARDS-19) and non-COVID-19 substudy (CAVIARDS-all) is shared (recruitment, procedures, data collection, analysis, management, etc.).
Sepsis leads to a deregulated host response that can lead to organ failure. During sepsis, experimental and clinical data suggest the occurrence of mitochondrial dysfunctions, particularly in circulating muscle and monocytes, which may contribute to organ failure and death. Lower respiratory infection is the leading cause of death from infectious causes. Mechanical ventilation (MV) is required in 20% of cases of bacterial pneumopathy with Streptococcus pneumoniae (S.p.) , with mortality reaching 50%. There are then frequently criteria for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), combining bilateral lung involvement and marked hypoxemia. Cyclic stretching of lung cells induced by MV causes sterile inflammation and tissue damage (i.e. ventilator-induced lung injury [VILI]), which can cause cellular dysfunction that alter the immune response, particularly during ARDS. This is why the application of a so-called protective MV is then required. However, this does not prevent about one-third of patients from showing signs of alveolar overdistension, as evidenced by an increase in motor pressure (MP) (MP≥ 15 cmH2O), associated with an increase in mortality. The deleterious effects of MV could be explained by the occurrence of mitochondrial abnormalities. Indeed, the cyclic stretching of lung cells leads to dysfunction in the respiratory chain and the production of free oxygen radicals (FOS), altering membrane permeability. These phenomena could promote VILI, facilitate the translocation of bacteria from the lung to the systemic compartment and lead to alterations in immune response. In our model of S.p. pneumopathy in rabbits, animals on MV develop more severe lung disorders (lack of pulmonary clearance of bacteria, bacterial translocation in the blood, excess mortality), compared to animals on spontaneous ventilation (SV). Intracellular pulmonary mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) concentrations, a reflection of the mitochondrial pool, are significantly decreased in ventilated rabbits compared to SV rabbits and in infected rabbits compared to uninfected rabbits. At the same time, the mitochondrial content of circulating cells decreased early (H8) in all infected rabbits, but was only restored in rabbits in SV, those who survived pneumonia (Blot et al, poster ECCMID 2015, submitted article). These data suggest an alteration in the mechanisms that restore mitochondrial homeostasis (mitochondrial biogenesis and mitophagy) during the dual infection/MV agression, which may explain the observed excess mortality. Other work by our team illustrates the importance of these phenomena by showing in a mouse model of polymicrobial infection that inhibition of mitophagia in macrophages promotes survival (Patoli et al, in preparation). Human data on this subject are non-existent. The phenomena of mitochondrial dysfunction nevertheless deserve to be explored in humans during the combined MV/pneumopathy aggression in order to understand its possible impact on the effectiveness of the host's immune response. In a personalized medicine approach, these data would open up prospects for targeted therapies, capable of activating mitochondrial biogenesis and/or modulating mitophagia, to prevent organ dysfunction and mortality during severe CALs treated with antibiotic therapy.