Patients Undergoing Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration: Effects of Increased Blood Flow

Acute Kidney Injury Clinical Trial

Official title:

Evaluation of Filters Useful Life, Metabolic Control, Electrolyte Profile and Acid-base Balance During Regional Anticoagulation With 4% Trisodium Citrate in Patients Undergoing CVVHDF: Effects of Increased Blood Flow

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05796661
• Other study ID #: CRRT-QbTrial
• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: January 9, 2023
• Est. completion date: September 30, 2024

Study information

• Verified date: January 2024
• Source: Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Acute Kidney Injure (AKI) is a syndrome with high incidence and prevalence in Intensive Care Units (ICU). It is estimated that 50% of the in the sector present AKI at some point and 10 to 15% require renal replacement therapy (RRT). Although studies do not show the superiority of continuous methods, the most severely ill patients are directed to this type of RRT. A disadvantage of continuous therapies is the need for anticoagulation. Critically ill patients have a pro-clotting state (inflammation) and several risk factors for bleeding (coagulopathies, postoperative, large vessel puncture). On the one hand, ineffective anticoagulation compromises the efficiency of the procedure, shortens the life of the extracorporeal system, consumes resources and increases blood loss due to unexpected and early filter clotting. There is no consensus on what would be the optimal blood flow (Qb) in continuous dialysis, especially when regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) is used. Theoretically, a higher flow rate would prevent stasis in the system and decrease the risk of filter clotting. Studies show conflicting results. Increasing Qb from 150 to 250 mL/min showed that circuit life and the chance of coagulation were similar. On the other hand, blood flow is important for maintaining the filtration fraction (FF), the ratio of ultrafiltrate flow to plasma flow. Ideally, the FF should be kept below 25% to avoid hemoconcentration and coagulation of the filter. Therefore, the higher the convection rate, the higher the blood flow should be to keep the FF in the optimal range. Since the anticoagulation capacity of citrate is dependent on its concentration, around 4 mmol/L of blood, by increasing the blood flow, the citrate infusion is proportionally increased. Theoretically, the higher citrate load offered should be metabolized and, in theory, could cause its overload with the occurrence of metabolic alkalosis and hypernatremia. This situation occurs when its maximum metabolizing capacity is not reached and there is an excess of citrate infusion relative to the buffering requirement. Thus, we intend to evaluate filter useful life, metabolic control, electrolyte profile and acid-base balance in ICU patients undergoing continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF), regional citrate anticoagulation during blood flow augmentation.

Description:

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a clinical syndrome with a high incidence and prevalence in Intensive care units (ICU). It is estimated that 50% of ICU patients have AKI at some point. About 10-15% of these individuals require renal replacement therapy (RRT). Although studies have not conclusively shown the superiority of continuous methods, the most severe patients are usually referred for this type of therapy. The main indications for continuous therapies are hemodynamic instability, cardiogenic shock, severe respiratory insufficiency, risk situations for brain edema, hypercatabolism, need for strict volume control, acute liver disease and major sodium disturbances. One of the main disadvantages of continuous therapies is the necessity of anticoagulation. Critically ill patients have a pro-clotting state (inflammation) and several risk factors for bleeding (coagulopathies, postoperative, large vessel puncture). On the one hand, the lack or ineffective anticoagulation compromises the efficiency of the procedure, shortens the life of the extracorporeal system, consumes resources and increases blood loss due to unexpected and early filter coagulation. On the other hand, excessive use of anticoagulants, especially heparin, is associated with bleeding and increased transfusions. In this scenario, regional anticoagulation with citrate (RCA) has become the method of choice in the different modalities of continuous dialysis. When compared to heparin, the use of regional citrate anticoagulation is associated with less bleeding and transfusion need and longer life of the extracorporeal system. It also seems to decrease endothelial activation, neutrophil degranulation and activation of the complement system. The anticoagulate property of citrate is based on its binding to calcium (Ca). Citrate quenches Ca in the extracorporeal system, an essential cofactor in several steps of coagulation. Optimal anticoagulation is achieved when ionic Ca concentration in the extracorporeal circuit is maintained between 0.25 and 0.35 mmol/L. This is usually achieved with a citrate level in the circuit around 4mmol/L of blood. Depending on the modality chosen and other factors, up to 60% of the citrate-Ca complex is eliminated during passage through the filter (molecular weigh of 298 Daltons and partition coefficient of 1.0). The rest is metabolized in the Krebs cycle mainly in the liver, kidneys and skeletal muscles. Each mol of trisodium citrate causes 3 moles of bicarbonate thus correctly, partially or completely, the metabolic acidosis resulting from renal failure. Ca and sodium (Na) are released into the systemic circulation. Trisodium citrate also increases the strong ion difference due to the high sodium concentration in the solution, thus increasing the buffering capacity. In parallel it is necessary the Ca replacement to maintain normal calcemia. The citrate also quenches magnesium, which can lead to a disturbance of this electrolyte. There is no consensus on what the optimal blood flow (Qb) would be in continuous dialysis, especially when using regional citrate anticoagulation. Theoretically, a higher blood flow would prevent stasis in the system and thus decrease the risk of filter coagulation. Studies show conflicting results. For example, one study evaluated increasing Qb from 150 to 250 mL/min and showed that circuit useful life and the chance of coagulation of the extracorporeal system were similar between the two groups. On the other hand, blood flow is important for maintaining the filtration fraction (FF), the ratio of ultra-filtrated flow to plasma flow (blood flow minus hematocrit). Ideally, the FF should be kept below 25% to avoid hemoconcentration and coagulation of the filter capillary fibers. So the higher the convection rate (ultrafiltration), the higher the blood flow should be to keep the FF in the optimal range. Since the anticoagulation capacity of citrate is dependent on its concentration, around 4 mmol/L of blood, by increasing blood flow, citrate infusion is proportionally increased. Theoretically, the higher citrate load offered should be metabolized and, in theory, could lead to citrate overload with the occurrence of metabolic alkalosis and hypernatremia. This situation occurs when the maximum capacity of citrate metabolization is not reached and there is an excess of citrate infusion relative to the buffering requirement. The total Ca/systemic ionic Ca ration remains normal, below 2.5. The oversupply of citrate can be easily corrected by decreasing the bicarbonate concentration of the dialysate, increasing the dialysate dose or decreasing the citrate infusion. Therefore, we intend to evaluate filter useful life, metabolic control, electrolyte profile and acid-base balance in ICU patients with AKI undergoing continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF), regional anticoagulation with citrate during increased blood flow. Hypothesis: Increasing blood flow during continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration prevents stasis in the system and thus reduces the risk of filter coagulation. Blood flow is important for maintaining the filtration fraction (FF), the ratio of ultrafiltrate flow to plasma flow (blood flow minus hematocrit). Ideally, the FF should be kept below 25% to avoid hemoconcentration and coagulation of the filter capillary fibers. So the higher convection rate (ultrafiltration), the higher the blood flow should be to keep the FF in the optimal range. Therefore, it is expected that higher blood flow (250 mL/min) will reduce the FF and concomitantly prolong the life of the filter.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Enrollment: 27
• Est. completion date: September 30, 2024
• Est. primary completion date: January 9, 2023
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

The inclusion criteria will be:

• Age greater than 18 years.
• Weight = 50 Kg.
• Agreeing to participate in the study (TCLE duly elucidated and signed by the patient or family member/guardian).
• Admitted to the hospital ICU.
• Acute Kidney Injury in need of RRT and indication (according to the evaluation of the assistant nephrologist) of continuous therapy.

Exclusion criteria will be:

• Age < 18 years.
• Weight < 50 Kg.
• Refusal to participate in the study (absence of informed consent).
• Patient with chronic kidney disease on dialysis

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Acute Kidney Injury

Intervention

Other:
• Effects of increased blood flow during regional anticoagulation with 4% trisodium citrate in patients undergoing continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration
Patients will be exposed to continuous venovenous renal therapy with distinct blood flows in 2 periods, to be defined by draw. The control group will have a flow of 150ml/min and the intervention group 250ml/min. Therapy is intended for a period of 72 hours (maximum defined by the manufacturer); with a 6-hour "washout" and, after that, the arm is changed to be exposed to the other blood flow.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Brazil	Hospital Israelite Albert Einstein	São Paulo

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Brazil, 

References & Publications (14)

AYRES, M., AYRES Jr, M., AYRES, D. L., SANTOS, A. A. S. Bioestat 5.3 aplicações estatísticas nas áreas das ciências biológicas e médicas. Belém: IDSM, 2007.364p.

Bauer E, Derfler K, Joukhadar C, Druml W. Citrate kinetics in patients receiving long-term hemodialysis therapy. Am J Kidney Dis. 2005 Nov;46(5):903-7. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.07.041. — View Citation

Bellomo R, Baldwin I, Ronco C, Kellum JA. ICU-Based Renal Replacement Therapy. Crit Care Med. 2021 Mar 1;49(3):406-418. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004831. No abstract available. — View Citation

Fuhrman DY, Kellum JA. Acute Kidney Injury in the Intensive Care Unit: Advances in the Identification, Classification, and Treatment of a Multifactorial Syndrome. Crit Care Clin. 2021 Apr;37(2):xiii-xv. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2021.01.001. Epub 2021 Feb 13. No abstract available. — View Citation

Gattas DJ, Rajbhandari D, Bradford C, Buhr H, Lo S, Bellomo R. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Regional Citrate Versus Regional Heparin Anticoagulation for Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy in Critically Ill Adults. Crit Care Med. 2015 Aug;43(8):1622-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001004. — View Citation

Kellum JA, Romagnani P, Ashuntantang G, Ronco C, Zarbock A, Anders HJ. Acute kidney injury. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021 Jul 15;7(1):52. doi: 10.1038/s41572-021-00284-z. — View Citation

Khadzhynov D, Schelter C, Lieker I, Mika A, Staeck O, Neumayer HH, Peters H, Slowinski T. Incidence and outcome of metabolic disarrangements consistent with citrate accumulation in critically ill patients undergoing continuous venovenous hemodialysis with regional citrate anticoagulation. J Crit Care. 2014 Apr;29(2):265-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.10.015. Epub 2013 Nov 11. — View Citation

Khwaja A. KDIGO clinical practice guidelines for acute kidney injury. Nephron Clin Pract. 2012;120(4):c179-84. doi: 10.1159/000339789. Epub 2012 Aug 7. No abstract available. — View Citation

Kramer L, Bauer E, Joukhadar C, Strobl W, Gendo A, Madl C, Gangl A. Citrate pharmacokinetics and metabolism in cirrhotic and noncirrhotic critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2003 Oct;31(10):2450-5. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000084871.76568.E6. — View Citation

Meersch M, Kullmar M, Wempe C, Kindgen-Milles D, Kluge S, Slowinski T, Marx G, Gerss J, Zarbock A; SepNet Critical Care Trials Group. Regional citrate versus systemic heparin anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (RICH) trial: study protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 21;9(1):e024411. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024411. — View Citation

Schneider AG, Journois D, Rimmele T. Complications of regional citrate anticoagulation: accumulation or overload? Crit Care. 2017 Nov 19;21(1):281. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1880-1. — View Citation

Stucker F, Ponte B, Tataw J, Martin PY, Wozniak H, Pugin J, Saudan P. Efficacy and safety of citrate-based anticoagulation compared to heparin in patients with acute kidney injury requiring continuous renal replacement therapy: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care. 2015 Mar 18;19(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0822-z. — View Citation

Yu W, Zhuang F, Ma S, Fan Q, Zhu M, Ding F. Optimized Calcium Supplementation Approach for Regional Citrate Anticoagulation. Nephron. 2019;141(2):119-127. doi: 10.1159/000494693. Epub 2018 Nov 16. — View Citation

Zarbock A, Kullmar M, Kindgen-Milles D, Wempe C, Gerss J, Brandenburger T, Dimski T, Tyczynski B, Jahn M, Mulling N, Mehrlander M, Rosenberger P, Marx G, Simon TP, Jaschinski U, Deetjen P, Putensen C, Schewe JC, Kluge S, Jarczak D, Slowinski T, Bodenstein M, Meybohm P, Wirtz S, Moerer O, Kortgen A, Simon P, Bagshaw SM, Kellum JA, Meersch M; RICH Investigators and the Sepnet Trial Group. Effect of Regional Citrate Anticoagulation vs Systemic Heparin Anticoagulation During Continuous Kidney Replacement Therapy on Dialysis Filter Life Span and Mortality Among Critically Ill Patients With Acute Kidney Injury: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2020 Oct 27;324(16):1629-1639. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.18618. — View Citation

* Note: There are 14 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Analyze filter/system useful life	Evaluate the duration of the continuous hemodiafiltration filter according to changes in blood flow	72 hours per filter
Secondary	Examine the system pressures	Assess changes in system pressures during the 2 blood flows (transmembrane pressure, filter pressure and access pressure)	72 hours per filter
Secondary	Assess filtration fraction variation	Assess filtration fraction variation during the 2 blood flows	72 hours per filter
Secondary	Electrolytic control - Potassium	Assess changes in potassium (changes from baseline)	72 hours per filter (dosage every 12 hours according to protocol)
Secondary	Electrolytic control - Sodium	Assess changes in sodium (changes from baseline)	72 hours per filter (dosage every 12 hours according to protocol)
Secondary	Acid-base balance - blood pH	Assess changes in blood pH during the 2 blood flows (changes from baseline)	72 hours per filter (venous blood gas analysis every 12 hours)
Secondary	Acid-base balance - sodium bicarbonate	Assess changes in sodium bicarbonate during the 2 blood flows (changes from baseline)	72 hours per filter (venous blood gas analysis every 12 hours)
Secondary	Acid-base balance - base excess	Assess changes in base excess during the 2 blood flows (changes from baseline)	72 hours per filter (venous blood gas analysis every 12 hours)
Secondary	Mortality of the cohort	Assess the overall mortality of the cohort in 30, 60 and 90 days	30, 60 and 90 days