View clinical trials related to Acute Coronary Syndrome.
Filter by:To improve the sensitivity and specificity of immunoassay, the developing trends are to lower the detection threshold and to minimize the cross reaction. A new assay technology called immunomagnetic reduction (IMR) has been developed for rapid and on-site assay with small volume of sample. Rapid diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a clinical and operational priority in busy emergency departments (ED), early and correct diagnosis is important. Cardiac enzymes (including CPK/CK-MB, troponins, myoglobulin) and electrocardiography (ECG) in combination with the medical history and physical examination are at present the diagnostic cornerstones. Novel biomarkers that rise earlier, have good diagnosis accuracy and have additional prognostic information are highly needed. The combination of multiple biomarker assays (markers of myocardial injury, inflammation/plaque ruptures or heart failure with different mechanism) may increase clinical sensitivity and improve early risk stratification. The present study, a rapid IMR assay with multiple biomarkers is proposed and we will examine the performance of this new investigational IMR assays, comparison with current commercial assays.
Excessive radiation received by the operator has been described as a possible drawback of the radial catheterization technique when compared with the femoral access. The study hypothesis is that the use of radial access device dedicated radioprotective TRIPTable ® (Transradial Intervention Table Protection) is not inferior to standard femoral technique and superior to standard radial technique as radioprotection strategy to the operator in patients with acute coronary syndromes acute and submitted to cardiac catheterization.
- Study objectives 1. To compare the safety and long-term efficacy of coronary stenting with biostable polymer drug-eluting stent (Promus PremierTM, Xience Alpine®, Resolute Onyx®) with biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stent (Biomatrix®, Biomatrix Flex®, Nobori®, Ultimaster®, Synergy ® and Orsiro®) in patients with acute coronary syndrome 2. To compare the efficacy and safety of 5 mg prasugrel maintenance therapy compared with 10 mg prasugrel maintenance therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention - Study design : Prospective, open-label, 2-by-2 multifactorial, randomized, multicenter trial to test the following in CHD patients 1. Non-inferiority of biostable polymer drug-eluting stent (Promus PremierTM, Xience Alpine®, Resolute Onyx®) compared with biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stent (Biomatrix®, Biomatrix Flex®, Nobori®, Ultimaster®, Synergy ® and Orsiro®) in terms of patient-oriented composite outcome 2. Non-inferiority of 5 mg compared to 10 mg dose of prasugrel maintenance in terms of major adverse cardiovascular events
Rationale: The introduction of drug-eluting stents (DES) in the treatment of coronary artery disease has led to a significant reduction in morbidity but there are further demands on DES performance. Such demands are an optimized performance in very challenging coronary lesions; third generation DES were developed in an effort to further improve DES performance in such challenging lesions. Two CE-certified third generation DES (Resolute Integrity and Promus Element stents) are currently available; there are no data that indicate an advantage of one of these DES over the other. Objective: To investigate whether the clinical outcome is similar after implantation of the Promus Element versus the Resolute Integrity stent (non-inferiority hypothesis). Study design: Multicenter, prospective, randomized single-blinded study. Study population: Patients who require percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) for the treatment of coronary stenoses with an indication for DES use, according to current guidelines and/or the operators clinical judgement. All clinical syndromes will be included. Intervention: In patients who are eligible for DES implantation, the type of DES implanted will be randomized (Resolute Integrity stent versus Promus Element stent). At the start of the study, both DES will also be used in routine clinical practice. Main study endpoints: The primary endpoint is the incidence of target vessel failure at one year follow-up. Target vessel failure (TVF) is a composite endpoint consisting of cardiac death, target vessel MI, or clinically driven target vessel revascularization. Further secondary clinical and angiographic endpoints will be investigated, defined in accordance with suggestions of the Academic Research Consortium (ARC). Of note, the angiographic assessment is based on clinically indicated projections only and results in no additional x-ray exposure. There is no routine angiographic follow-up. If angiographic data are available in patients who undergo symptom-driven re-catheterization, we will analyze these data to get insight into the mechanisms of potential DES restenosis. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Patients will receive the routine clinical treatment. As a consequence, the risks of this trial do not exceed the risks of any routine PCI procedure.
To evaluate The Safety and Efficacy of 'AVI' Stent Comparing with Firebird2® For Treating Coronary Revascularization.
The aim of this study is to evaluate if acute invasive coronary evaluation and treatment conducted within 12 hours of diagnosis improves clinical outcome compared to a deferred, subacute strategy in patients with unstable angina pectoris (UAP) / non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) Furthermore, in an observational design the potential clinical benefit of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) to select patients for invasive investigation and treatment in the two treatment arms (acute vs deferred) is evaluated. The following main hypothesis will be tested: - Very early invasive coronary investigation improves clinical outcome in patients with UAP/NSTEMI-ACS - CCTA performed before invasive coronary investigation will improve clinical management of patients with UAP/NSTEMI-ACS
To test the hypothesis that early (within 5-21 days after index event) administration of combined lipid-lowering therapy in extremely high risk population of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) who experienced acute coronary syndrome (ACS) will be effective and well tolerated in achievement of contemporary strict requirements for triglyceride (TG) levels as an independent risk factor in the case of HTG with diabetes.
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety, at 24 months, of the TITAN2 stent to any bare-metal stent (BMS) in Cobalt-Chromium in a population presenting an indication for these stents among 40% of which present an acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
Young patients requiring myocardial revascularization are generally considered at low operative risk, but data on their immediate and late outcome are scarce. The decision-making process in these young patients is complicated by the potentially aggressive nature of premature coronary artery disease and their likely long expectancy of life, which expose them to a significantly higher risk of recurrent coronary events as well as the need of repeat revascularization. The lack of data on long-term outcome as well as on operative details (in particular, on the use of arterial grafts) and peri- and postoperative medication prevent any conclusive results on the durability either of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in these young patients. Furthermore, recent advances in stents technology as well in peri- and postoperative medical treatment indicate the need a comparative study to define the baseline characteristics of patients aged < 50 years undergoing either PCI or CABG and to evaluate their current immediate and late outcome.
1. Objective : To test the safety of 6 month-duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) compared to conventional 12-month-or-longer duration after second-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). 2. Hypothesis : A 6-month duration of DAPT is non-inferior to a conventional 12-month-or longer duration of DAPT at preventing the occurrence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 18-month after second-generation DES implantation in patients with ACS.