Acute Appendicitis Clinical Trial
Official title:
Randomized Control Trial Comparing Proposed Algorithm and Current Best Practice in the Evaluation of Suspected Appendicitis
Acute appendicitis is one of the most common causes of acute abdominal pain requiring
surgical intervention. In the current era, with diagnostic imaging technique like Computed
Tomography (CT), negative appendectomy rates have been greatly reduced. However, the
radiation risk with CT poses as a concern. Rules for clinical decision guiding CT utilization
is thus essential to minimize unnecessary CT scans, which not only poses a radiation risk but
also contributes to increased healthcare costs.
Through the development of an algorithm based on Alvarado Score for the management of acute
appendicitis, investigators hope to reduce CT utilization with an acceptable negative
appendectomy rate, and hence reducing unnecessary radiation and the healthcare costs
involved.
Acute appendicitis is one of the most common causes of acute abdominal pain requiring
surgical intervention, with a lifetime risk of 8.6% for males and 6.7% for females.
Historically, negative appendectomy rates of more than 20% were considered the norm. This is
no longer acceptable in the current era, as despite low complication rates in the setting of
negative appendectomy, conditions such as incisional hernias, intestinal obstruction
secondary to adhesions and stump leakages can still result in significant morbidity.
Computed Tomography (CT) scan has emerged as the dominant imaging modality for evaluation of
suspected appendicitis in adults. It has decreased negative appendectomy rates to fewer than
10%. However, the radiation exposure with CT poses a concern, particularly in appendicitis,
which occurs predominantly in young patients most susceptible to the adverse effects of
radiation. Available literature has estimated that at least 25% of CT scans are not
clinically warranted and may pose more harm than benefits. Rules for clinical decision
guiding CT utilization is thus essential to minimize unnecessary CT scans, which not only
poses a radiation risk but also contributes to increased healthcare costs.
Currently, the management of suspected appendicitis is surgeon dependent. Accuracy of
diagnosis is dependent on individual's clinical acumen, preference for CT scan and threshold
for offering surgery. There is also a recent trend towards indiscriminate CT utilization with
an estimated 1 in 4 CT scans ordered found to be clinically unwarranted. The Alvarado Score
(AS) is a 10 point clinical scoring system for acute appendicitis that has been extensively
validated. AS on a prospective database of 500 consecutive cases of suspected appendicitis
admitted to Singapore General Hospital, Department of General Surgery from August 2013 to
July 2014, was validated. A comparison was then made between diagnostic performance measures
of CT scan and AS to identify ranges of AS where patients are unlikely to benefit from CT
evaluation. From these findings, an objective algorithm for the management of suspected
appendicitis guided by AS was formulated. Ideally, the algorithm will streamline CT
utilization and reduce the number of CT scans ordered with an acceptable negative
appendectomy rate. Thus, investigators hope to validate this proposed algorithm through a
randomized control trial.
The trial will recruit 160 eligible patients over 2 years. Eligible patients who consented to
participate in the trial will be subjected to randomization into one of the two trial groups
- Usual Care Arm or Intervention Arm - in equal numbers (n=80). Patients randomized to Usual
Care Arm will be managed according to individual's doctor discretion. On the other hand,
patients randomized to Intervention Arm will have their Alvarado Score tabulated and managed
as per proposed algorithm.
The primary objective of the trial is to show that the proposed management algorithm is
effective in reducing the percentage of CT utilization as compared to current best practice
for patients with suspected appendicitis seen at Singapore General Hospital and Sengkang
Health. The hypothesis is that the proposed management algorithm will reduce the percentage
of CT scans from 80%, which is the CT utilization rate when current best practice is used, to
60%. The study will be powered to detect this decrease with a 5% type I error rate.
The secondary objective of the trial is to estimate the proportion of negative appendectomy
and missed diagnosis in each of the study arm. In addition, the total length of stay in days
and overall cost of stay would also be estimated and compared between the two study arms.
These secondary objectives are purely descriptive and no hypothesis testing is planned for
these objectives.
Randomization schedule will be generated using standard statistical software by a
statistician who is not going to be involved in data analysis. Envelopes containing the
treatment instructions will be marked according to that schedule. Randomization will be
performed in blocks of six subjects, three for intervention and three for control arm, to
ensure balanced groups.
If the proposed algorithm is validated and found to be of value, it can potentially be
implemented nationwide as a standard protocol for the evaluation of suspected appendicitis.
This may reduce the number of unwarranted CT scans performed and reduce health care costs. In
addition, the reduction of unnecessary CT scans helps to minimize unwarranted radiation
exposure which is not insignificant. A single CT Abdomen Pelvis for evaluation of suspected
appendicitis exposes one to 14 mSv of ionizing radiation which adds an additional cancer risk
of up to 0.2% for an individual who is 30 years of age. The cumulative effects of such
radiation exposure may prove significant and a management algorithm guiding sensible CT
utilization will help ease the burden of radiation induced complications in the future.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT01697059 -
Initial Antibiotics and Delayed Appendectomy for Acute Appendicitis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04387370 -
The Use of the Hem-o-lok Clip in Appendectomy: Single or Double?
|
||
Completed |
NCT04649996 -
Variation in Acute Appendicitis During COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy
|
||
Completed |
NCT04030741 -
Non-operative Treatment of Acute Non-perforated Appendicitis
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04860570 -
Are Double-ring Wound-edge Protectors Effective for Preventing Superficial Surgical Site Infection After Open Appendectomy?
|
||
Withdrawn |
NCT05724628 -
Non-operative vs. Operative Management of Acute Appendicitis in Vulnerable Patient Populations
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT01024439 -
Transumbilical Single Incision Versus Conventional Three Incisions Laparoscopic Appendicectomy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02714023 -
Water And Saline Head-to-head In The Blinded Evaluation Study Trial
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT01022567 -
Appendicectomy Versus Antibiotics in the Treatment of Acute Uncomplicated Appendicitis
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06059365 -
Clinical Trial for a Outpatient Clinical Management for Complicated Acute Appendicitis
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06051825 -
Diagnostic Importance of the C-reactive Protein From Blood and Saliva in Children With Acute Appendicitis
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04947748 -
Short Post-operative Antibacterial Therapy in Complicated Appendicitis: Oral Versus Intravenous
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT04207645 -
Modification and Validation of the RIPASA Score for Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis
|
||
Completed |
NCT04615728 -
MANAGEMENT OF APPENDICITIS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02789865 -
Clinical Trial Comparing ERAT vs Antibiotic Therapy vs Appendectomy for Treatment of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02731924 -
Point of Care Ultrasound for Evaluation of Suspected Appendicitis in the Emergency Department
|
||
Completed |
NCT05104346 -
Presentation and Outcomes of Acute Appendicitis During COVID Pandemic
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03886896 -
Intravenous Lidocaine in Children Undergoing Laparoscopic Appendectomy
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT01720082 -
Laparoscopic Appendectomy by Multi-port vs Single Port.
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01348464 -
A Trial on Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Single Port Appendectomy
|
N/A |