View clinical trials related to Acute Appendicitis.
Filter by:This is a randomized prospective study comparing single incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy for management of acute appendicitis.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether computed tomography is reliable investigation in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
The aim of this study is to compare patients who undergone single-port access laparoscopic appendectomy to those who underwent conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy (TPLA) in a prospective randomized trial
Case control studies that randomly assign patients to either surgical or non-surgical treatment yield a relapse rate of approximately 14% at one year. It would be useful to know the relapse rate of patients who have, instead, been selected for a given treatment based on a thorough clinical evaluation, including physical examination and laboratory results (all characteristics forming the Alvarado Score) as well as radiological exams if needed or deemed helpful. If this clinical evaluation is useful,the investigators would expect patient selection to be better than chance, and relapse rate lower than 14%. Once the investigators have established the utility of this evaluation, the investigators can begin to identify those components that have predictive value (such as blood chemistry analysis, or CT findings). This is the first step toward developing an accurate diagnostic-therapeutic algorithm which will avoid the risks and costs of needless surgery. This will be a single-cohort prospective interventional study. It will not interfere with the usual procedures, consisting of clinical examination in the Emergency Department (ED) and execution of the following exams at the physician's discretion: complete blood count with differential, C reactive protein, abdominal ultrasound, abdominal CT. Patients admitted to Emergency Department with Lower Abdominal and suspicion of Acute Appendicitis not needing immediate surgery, are requested by informed consent to undergo observation and non operative treatment with antibiotic therapy (Amoxicillin and Clavulanic Acid). The patients by protocol should not have received any previous antibiotic treatment during the same clinical episode. Patients not undergoing surgery will be physically examined 5 days later. During this follow-up visit, the patient will be given information about the study, will be invited to participate, and will be asked to sign an informed consent form. If the patient is under the age of 18 years, consent will be obtained from a parent or other legal guardian. Telephone (or email) follow-ups will be conducted at 15 days, 6 months, and 12 months (see attached schedule) to monitor the state of the illness.
Laparoscopic appendicectomy is widely practiced in Hong Kong nowadays with shorter hospital stay and less wound complications. Most of the time, three small wounds of less than 10mm will be adequate enough for the completion of the surgery with minimal pain. Recently, the concept of Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (N.O.T.E.S) led to the attention of single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) again in the surgical community. SILS is not a new idea. The first SILS for cholecystectomy was reported in 1997 by Navarra et al. However, the close proximity of the instruments, limitation in triangulation during dissection and suboptimal exposure of the surgical field has made this approach unpopular in last decade. Because the concept of N.O.T.E.S and the newly designed access port, surgeons are now focused again on SILS. The Chinese University of Hong Kong has recently release their preliminary results on the use of SILS on appendicectomy with satisfactory results in terms of less post-operative pain and less prominent scar. However, it was a case series with limited number of patients. In order to test the advantages of SILS on the management of patients with acute appendicitis, a double blinded randomized clinical trial is conducted.
Patients undergoing open appendectomy for acute appendicitis were enrolled in a randomized prospective study.