Acute Aortic Syndrome Clinical Trial
Official title:
Is a Pre-contrast Scan Necesary to Diagnose Acute Aortic Syndrome?
Acute Aortic Syndrome (AAS) is a potentially life-threatening cause of sudden, severe chest
pain. There are several possible underlying causes, which cannot be distinguished from one
another at the bedside.
Current practice is to image this with two CT scans of the chest, one before injection of a
contrast dye into the blood stream and then one after.
With the advancement of CT scanner technology, improvements in software interpretation and
screen resolution, the investigators hypothesise that performing the contrast scan on its
own is diagnostically equivalent to both the pre- and contrast scans
AAS include: a tear in the wall of the main artery from the heart, bleeding directly into
this wall, an ulcer in the wall, and excess dilatation and rupture of the main artery wall.
These are also treated differently according to where they are in the length of the aorta.
It is therefore important to identify precisely the subtype of AAS and its location to allow
the clinician to manage the patient appropriately.
Current practice is to image this with two CT scans of the chest, one before injection of a
contrast dye into the blood stream and then one after. The one before the contrast is used
to determine if there is bleeding within the wall, which would show up as white on this
scan. It is currently accepted that the contrast in the artery itself would hide the
presence of bleeding within the wall. The other causes are seen primarily on the contrast
scan only. Every patient proceeds from the pre-contrast scan to the contrast scan, unless
there is a contraindication to the intravenous dye.
The investigators own database search has shown that radiologists protocol the scans
according to their own preference and experience (i.e. some do both scans, others the
contrast scan only). There is conflicting advice from international professional bodies as
to whether to perform the non-contrast scan every time.
Some studies have shown that although the pre-contrast scan is sensitive to picking up
bleeding within the wall, it adds nothing more over an increased radiation dose to the
patient.
The investigators hypothesise that performing the contrast scan on its own is diagnostically
equivalent to both the pre- and contrast scans to look for all 4 of these entities that make
up AAS. The investigators also propose that not requiring the pre-contrast scan would have
significant savings in patient radiation dose, scanner time, network resources and
radiologist time.
;
Observational Model: Cohort, Time Perspective: Retrospective
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03647566 -
18F Sodium Fluoride PET/CT in Acute Aortic Syndrome
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05965453 -
Evaluation of the Castor Single Branch Stent Graft in Treatment of Acute Aortic Syndrome
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05339529 -
Additive Anti-inflammatory Action for Aortopathy & Arteriopathy (Thymosin α1) V
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06277895 -
VOCs in Patients With Acute Cardiogenic Chest Pain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04699279 -
Additive Anti-inflammatory Action for Aortopathy & Arteriopathy (Rosuvastatin) I
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04711889 -
Additive Anti-inflammatory Action for Aortopathy & Arteriopathy (Ulinastatin) II
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT04398992 -
Additive Anti-inflammatory Action for Aortopathy & Arteriopathy
|
||
Completed |
NCT04751058 -
Genetic Profile in Patients With Aortic Syndrome
|
||
Completed |
NCT04430400 -
Integrated Diagnostic Algorithm for Acute Aortic Syndromes
|
||
Completed |
NCT01259843 -
French National Observatory of Aortic Syndromes
|