Clinical Trials Logo

Achalasia Cardia clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Achalasia Cardia.

Filter by:
  • Active, not recruiting  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT06290882 Active, not recruiting - Achalasia Cardia Clinical Trials

Endoscopic Versus Robotic Myotomy for Treatment of Achalasia

ERMA
Start date: January 1, 2024
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Achalasia is a primary esophageal motor disorder of unknown etiology characterized by degeneration of the myenteric plexus, resulting in impaired relaxation of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ), along with loss of peristalsis in the esophageal body. The standard criteria for diagnosing achalasia is high-resolution esophageal manometry, which shows incomplete relaxation of the EGJ along with absence of esophageal body peristalsis. These anomalies usually cause dysphagia and regurgitation as the main symptoms of this pathology. Different treatment options have been described for this pathology, with pneumatic dilation (PD) and myotomy being considered first-line, whether surgical (laparoscopic Heller myotomy, LHM) or endoscopic (peroral endoscopic myotomy, POEM). The arrival of POEM as a less invasive alternative for the treatment of achalasia has revolutionized expectations to the point that it has become a routine procedure in many centers around the world. In recent years, a large amount of data examining the effectiveness of POEM have appeared, including several meta-analyses. The success rate of POEM in prospective cohorts has been greater than 90%. Two randomized studies have been published comparing POEM with LHM, providing a framework to evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of these two interventions and to determine which should be first-line for the treatment of these patients. According to these data, it seems that the two procedures offer the same clinical results in the medium term. On the other hand, in recent years, there has been a growing expansion of the application of robot-assisted technology. Robotic Heller myotomy (RHM) has been proposed as an alternative minimally invasive approach to traditional laparoscopy with a lower complication rate. Based on the evidence, POEM and RHM could have comparable results in short term, but there is no clear certainty about the results in medium-long term. Likewise, there is a lack of studies that confirm postoperative reflux results in both procedures. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the clinical and quality of life results of the RHM and compare them with the results of POEM in treatment of achalasia.

NCT ID: NCT03438838 Active, not recruiting - Achalasia Cardia Clinical Trials

Randomised Trial Between LHM Alone Vs LHM With Anterior Fundoplication In Achalasia Cardia

Start date: January 24, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Back ground: Achalasia Cardia (AC) manifests with major symptom dysphagia. Surgery as the treatment modality relieves dysphagia in most of the patients. Laparoscopic Heller's myotomy(LHM) is the surgery of choice but is associated with gastroesophageal reflux. Anterior fundoplication (Dor Fundoplication) is usually combined with LHM in patients with AC. It reduces gastroesophageal reflux following LHM. It has been observed that along with reduction of gastroesophageal reflux Dor Fundoplication also affects relief of dysphagia. But it has not been prospectively studied. Hypothesis:The hypothesis of present study is that "Frequency of dysphagia following Laparoscopic Heller's myotomy with Dor fundoplication is more than that compared to Laparoscopic Heller's myotomy alone in patients with Achalasia Cardia". Methods: From December2017 to November 2018 minimum of 20 patients with diagnosis of Achalasia cardia will be randomized to receive either Laparoscopic Heller's myotomy (LHM) alone or LHM with Dor fundoplication. Symptomatic outcomes would be assessed using frequency of dysphagia and Eckardt's score. . Outcomes: Primary outcome is Frequency of dysphagia and secondary outcome is manometry pressure assessment. Statistical analysis would be done using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) soft ware. P value < 0.05 is considered significant.