Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04336813
Other study ID # 1439-03-001
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date December 6, 2017
Est. completion date May 29, 2018

Study information

Verified date December 2020
Source Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Methodology :A cross-over randomised controlled trial comparing two teaching methods Duration :Start date 6th December 2017 to 29st May 2018 Objective : To evaluate the effectiveness phone-based audience response system (PB-ARS) on knowledge retention and performance in teaching orthodontics for dental undergraduate students in a Saudi Dental School Number:The cohort of the trial includes 34 fourth-year dental students that represents whole fourth-year undergraduate class Main Inclusion criteria : whole fourth-year undergraduate class in a Saudi Dental college. Statistical Analysis : The normal distribution will be tested. The Mann-Whitney U test will used to compare the median score for each answer that would be given by students in the questionnaires. Scores will be analyzed and compared to assess knowledge retention using cross-over analysis with Mann-Whitney U test


Description:

Design: The trial was designed as a cross-over clustered randomized control trial (each group was a cluster), so that each group acted as their own control for their knowledge's retention and perception. Setting and consent: College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University/Alkharj/ Saudi Arabia. Written consents were obtained from students before commencing the trail. Participants : The cohort of the trial included the whole fourth-year undergraduate class (34 undergraduate dental students) in order to eliminate selection bias. Participants in this study had no prior orthodontic teaching, hence, no bias associated with increased knowledge in any orthodontic field was anticipated. Randomization: Students were allocated to one of two even groups (G1 or G2) using computer generated randomization. each group (G1 and G2) consisted of 17 male students with a mean age of (23.27 years ± 0.86). Intervention : Lectures : Simultaneously, G1 and G2 attended two lectures (L1&L2): L1 was titled "Management of Class III malocclusion", L2 was titled "Management of open bite and cross-bite". Both lectures were presented at the main campus of Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz College of Dentistry and they were conducted in an identical manner in all aspects including: - Presentation in PowerPoint (Microsoft Corp, Redmond, WA) - Both lectures were delivered by the same registered specialist orthodontist (FA), - Learning outcomes of the delivered lectures (T1 and T2) were based on teaching outcomes specified by the National Commission for Academic Accreditation and Assessment in Saudi Arabia, and - Both lectures delivered over the same period of time. Prior to lectures, students were instructed to register with the audience response system (ARS) and download its application (Poll Everywhere, San Francisco, California, USA, https://www.polleverywhere.com). Additional smart phones were available to students who do not have smart phones at the time of the lecture. Students were unaware of their allocation until the beginning of the first lecture. In the lecture hall, G1 was separated from G2, and both groups completed an assessment of written multiple-choice questions (MCQs) scored out of 20, before the lecture. During L1, phone based (ARS) questions (PB-ARS) secretly displayed on the smart phones of the students in G1, and they were allowed to read the question and answer it, while those in parallel arm of the trial (G2) were blinded to those questions and answers. At the end of L1, both groups completed the same written MCQs assessment . A similar protocol was undertaken during L2 a week later, except that the groups were crossed-over, hence, the group which has had ARS integrated lecture in the previous week, has received in a non-ARS integrated lecture, and vice versa. Formative exam: MCQs formative tests consisted of 20 questions related to the taught topics during L1 and L2 was undertaken. In order to reduce the carry over effect, the PB-ARS questions during the lectures were not similar to the MCQs sheet. The used MCQs were piloted between authors to ensure its content validity and reliability. Contents validity was tested using test matrix and expert judgment. The test reliability was estimated using inter-rater reliability, a correlation of more than 0.7 was considered acceptable. Summative exam: Both groups attended their final written summative exams. L1 was undertaken 11 weeks prior to final exam while L2 was undertaken 10 weeks before the exam. The final exam was in MCQs format and included questions from all subjects taught in the second semester of the year including five questions relevant to the subjects taught in L1 and L2. The exam questions were identical for all students and were delivered at the same time under controlled conditions. Students who failed to attend the final summative exam were excluded to reduce the effect of time factor as confounding factors. The final exam scores of all student to questions related to TL1 and TL2 were anonymously collated using an excel sheet by independent tutor to reduce reporting bias. The maximum achievable score for the five questions relevant to the subjects taught in L1 and L2 was 5. Students' perception: At the end of L1, both groups were asked to fill a questionnaire regarding their experience with the lecture and intervention group participants were asked specific questions about their experience with PA-ARS . The used questionnaire was modified version from a previously used questionnaire to assess students experience with ARS in a recent trial . Students' responses were saved in an excel sheet after each lecture (L1, L2). Analysis of the results: Students' scores were saved in an excel sheet after each test. A specialized statistical analysis software was used (IBM SPSS statistics 22, version 22) The statistician was blinded to the allocation group. Scores were analyzed and compared to assess knowledge retention using cross-over analysis with Mann-Whitney U test for pre and post lecture quiz and t-test for summative test.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 34
Est. completion date May 29, 2018
Est. primary completion date March 20, 2018
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender Male
Age group N/A and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: fourth-year undergraduate dental student Exclusion Criteria: Other undergraduate dental students from levels other than the 4th

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Other:
Audience Response system
In the lecture hall, G1 was separated from G2, and both groups completed an assessment of written multiple-choice questions (MCQs) scored out of 20, before the lecture. During L1, phone based (ARS) questions (PB-ARS) secretly displayed on the smart phones of the students in G1, and they were allowed to read the question and answer it, while those in parallel arm of the trial (G2) were blinded to those questions and answers. At the end of L1, both groups completed the same written MCQs assessment

Locations

Country Name City State
Saudi Arabia Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University Al Kharjah
Saudi Arabia Prince Sattam University Riyadh

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Saudi Arabia, 

References & Publications (1)

Dhaliwal HK, Allen M, Kang J, Bates C, Hodge T. The effect of using an audience response system on learning, motivation and information retention in the orthodontic teaching of undergraduate dental students: a cross-over trial. J Orthod. 2015 Jun;42(2):123-35. doi: 10.1179/1465313314Y.0000000129. Epub 2015 Apr 7. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Formative exam MCQs formative tests consisted of 20 questions related to the taught topics during L1 and L2 was undertaken 10 minutes
Secondary Perception At the end of L1, both groups were asked to fill a questionnaire regarding their experience with the lecture and intervention group participants were asked specific questions about their experience with PA-ARS 10 minutes
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03906851 - Active and Healthy Kids in Telemark - a School Based Health Promoting Intervention N/A
Recruiting NCT04864756 - Simulation Based Learning and Academic Performance in Medical School N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03939208 - Efficacy of a Brief Intervention for School Clinicians (BRISC) N/A
Completed NCT02240264 - Effect of Omega-3 LCPUFA Intervention on Learning, Cognition, Behaviour and Visual Processing. N/A
Recruiting NCT05602948 - ACTIVE SCHOOL - Effects on Academic Performance of Novel Approaches to Increase Physical Activity in School-children N/A
Recruiting NCT05012293 - Cognitive Fatigue, Self-Regulation, and Academic Performance: A Physiological Study N/A